Skip to Main Content

Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology
2014. Vol. 3, no. 2, 29–40
ISSN: 2304-4977 (online)

Empirical study of the degrees to which social support, social status and gender affect the academic achievement

1514

A. Volkov, E. Zerkalova

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The article reviews the studies of foreign authors concerning the impact of various factors on academic achievement. The factors under the study are: sociometric status, social support on the side of significant others, gender, support on the side of the family and the peer group.

General Information

Keywords: success. Academic achievement, sociometry, scale of perceived social suppor, scale of social status, gender

Journal rubric: Educational Psychology and Pedagogical Psychology

Article type: review article

For citation: Volkov A., Zerkalova E. Empirical study of the degrees to which social support, social status and gender affect the academic achievement [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2014. Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 29–40. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Adler P.A., Kless S.J., Adler P. Socialization to gender roles: popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education. 1992. Vol. 65, pp. 169–187.
  2. Alpar R. Uygulamali Çok Degiskenli Istatistiksel Yöntemlere Giris-I. 1st ed. Ankara: Bagirgan Yayinevi. 1997.
  3. Austin A.B., Draper D.C. The relationship among peer acceptance, social impact, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 1984. Vol. 21, Iss. 3, pp. 597–604.
  4. Bahar H.H. KPSS puanlarinin akademik basari ve cinsiyet açisindan degerlendirilmesi. Egitim ve Bilim. 2006. Vol. 31, Iss. 140, pp. 68–74.
  5. Bahar H.H. The effects of gender, perceived social support and sociometric status on academic success. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010, pp. 3801–3805.
  6. Büyüköztürk S. Sosyal Bilimler Için Veri Analizi El Kitabi, Ankara: Perem-A Yayinevi. 2008.
  7. Çetin F., Bilbay A.A., Kaymak D.A. Arastirmadan Uygulamaya Çocuklarda Sosyal Beceriler-Grup Egitimi, Istanbul: Epsilon Yayincilik. 2003.
  8. Cüceloglu D. Insan ve Davranisi, Istanbul: Remzi Kitabevi. 1996.
  9. Dökmen Ü. Empati kurma becerisi ile sosyometrik statü arasindaki iliski. Ankara Üniversitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 1987. Vol. 20, Iss. 1, pp. 183–207.
  10. Duckworth A.L., Seligman M.E. Self-discipline gives girls the edge: gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2006. Vol. 98, Iss. 1, pp. 198–208.
  11. Eccles J.S. Families, schools, and developing achievement-related motivations and engagement. Handbook of Socialization. J. E. Grusec, P. D. Hastings (eds.). New York: The Guilford Press, 2007, pp. 665–691.
  12. Effects of the peer group on the development of social functioning and academic achievement: a longitudinal study in Chinese children. Chen X., Chang L., Liu H., He Y. Child Development. 2008. Vol. 79, Iss. 2, pp. 235–251.
  13. Eker D., Arkar H., Yaldz H. Çok boyutlu algilanan sosyal destek ölçeginin gözden geçirilmis formunun faktör yapisi geçerlik ve güvenirligi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2001. Vol. 12, Iss. 1, pp. 17–25.
  14. Felmlee D.H. Interaction in social networks. Handbook of Social Psychology. J. Delameter (ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2003, pp. 389–409.
  15. Hopmeyer Gorman A., Kim J., Schimmelbusch A. The attributes adolescents associate with peer popularity and teacher preference. Journal of School Psychology, 2002. Vol. 40, pp. 143–165.
  16. Kaya A., Siyez D.M. Sociometric status and life satisfaction among turkish elementary school students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2008. Vol. 32, pp. 69–82.
  17. Kongar E. Toplumsal Degisme Kuramlari ve Türkiye Gerçegi. Istanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 2002.
  18. LaFontana K. M., Cillessen A.H.N. Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology. 2002. Vol. 38, pp. 635–647.
  19. Mau W. C., Lynn R. Gender differences on the scholastic aptitude test the American college test and college grades. Educational Psychology, 2001. Vol. 21, Iss. 2, pp. 133–136.
  20. Öztürk E. Çoklu Dogrusal Regresyon Modeli. SPSS Uygulamali Çok Degiskenli Istatistik Teknikleri. S. Kalayci (ed.). Ankara: Asil Yayin Dagitim, 2007, pp. 259–272.
  21. Parkhurst J.T., Hopmeyer A.G. Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 1998. Vol. 18, pp. 125–144.
  22. Peker R. Uludag üniversitesi egitim fakültesi beden egitimi ve spor bölümü ögrencilerinin genel akademik basarilarinin bazi degiskenlere göre incelenmesi. Uludag Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2003. Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 161–171.
  23. Perceived parent social support and academic-achievement an attachment theory perspective. Cutrano C.E., Cole V., Colangelo N., Assouline S., Russel D. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994. Vol. 66, Iss. 2, pp. 369–378.
  24. Pomerantz E.M., Altermatt E.R., Saxson J.L. Making the grade but feeling distressed: gender differences in academic performance and internal distress. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2002. Vol. 94, Iss. 2, pp. 396–404.
  25. Roeser R.W., Eccles J.S., Sameroff A.J. School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: a summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal. 2000. Vol. 100, pp. 443–471.
  26. Rosenfeld L.B., Richman J.M., Bowen G.L. Social support networks and school outcomes: the centrality of the teacher. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2000. Vol. 17, pp. 205–226.
  27. Szabo A.G. Personal relationship and social support. The Journal of Contemporary Human Services. 1994. Vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 123–125.
  28. The impact of peer relations on academic progress in junior high. Lubbers M.J., Van Der Werf M.P.C., Snijders T.A.B., Bert P.M., Creemers B.P.M., Kuyper H. Journal of School Psychology. 2006. Vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 491–512.
  29. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Zimet G.D., Dahlem N.W., Zimet S.G., Farley G.K. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1988. Vol. 52, pp. 30–41.
  30. Wentzel K.R. Social relationships and motivation in middle school: the role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1998. Vol. 90, pp. 202–209.
  31. Yildirim I. Akademik basarinin yordayicisi olarak gündelik sikintilar ve sosyal destek. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2007. Vol. 30, pp. 258–267.
  32. Yildirim I. Algilanan sosyal destek ölçeginin gelistirilmesi güvenirligi ve geçerligi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 1997. Vol. 13, pp. 81–87.

Information About the Authors

A. Volkov, PhD student at the Department of Social Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: alexander.volkov.89@mail.ru

Ekaterina Zerkalova, Project Coordinator in Hotels & Hospitality Department at Jones Lang LaSalle LLC, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: Kate_zerkalova@yahoo.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 3759
Previous month: 13
Current month: 18

Downloads

Total: 1514
Previous month: 6
Current month: 3