Мероприятия по поддержке девочек с нарушениями зрения в Саудовской Аравии: качественное исследование

Данное исследование посвящено тому, насколько хорошо программы поддержки незрячих девочек в Саудовской Аравии отвечают потребностям их потребностям, а также ожиданиям их родителей и учителей. Анализировались причины выбора программ поддержки, а также пути их улучшения. В основе исследования, выполненного с помощью метода кейсов, лежит теоретический анализ литературы, состоящий в основном из обзора документов Министерства образования, школьных политик и учебных программ и других документов государственного сектора. В исследовании использовалась качественная методология с участием исследователя в интерпретации результатов, четко описанных в заключительном разделе. Программа исследования состояла из серии полуструктурированных интервью с детьми, родителями и учителями, за которыми следовала серия наблюдений в школах. Результаты интервью были проанализированы путем тематического анализа. Наиболее важные выводы заключались в том, что учителям необходимо иметь теплые отношения со своими учениками и проявлять к ним особый интерес; существует потребность в большей гибкости и свободе учебной программы, позволяющей учителям разрабатывать школьные и индивидуальные образовательные траектории в сочетании с более широким использованием имеющихся технологий; следует включить более практические, полезные и актуальные темы для повышения качества услуг по поддержке незрячих школьниц и их родителей. Проектирование образовательных учреждений для незрячих девочек должно производиться с учетом их потребностей, поскольку Саудовская Аравия продолжает свою амбициозную программу реструктуризации образования.

1. Alanazi M. Teachers’ and parents’ attitudes towards inclusion in inclusive schools in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation). UK: University of Warwick, 2012, 478 p.
2. Alenizi M.A.K. Investigation into the adopted supervisory practices in the teaching practice of special education needs student teachers in Saudi Arabia: Different perspectives. (Doctoral dissertation). UK: University of Exeter, 2012, 418 p.
3. Al-Aoufi H., Al-Zyoud N., Shahminan N. Islam and the cultural conceptualisation of disability. International Journal of Adolescents and Youth, 2012, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 205–219. DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2011.649565
4. Alemam A.M., Aldebasi M.H., Rehmatullah A. et al. Prevalence of myopic among children attending paediatrics ophthalmology clinic at Ohud hospital, Medina, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2018, article number 3708409, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1155/ 2018/3708409
5. Al-Gain S.I., Al-Abdulwahab S.S. Issues and obstacles in disability research in Saudi Arabia, 2002. URL: www.aifo.it/english/resources/online/apdrj/apdrj102/arabia.pdf (Accessed: 07.09.2008).
6. Al-Hazmi M. Investigative research on disability in Al-Medina area. Riyadh: Prince Salman Centre for Disability Research Press, 1995, 156 p.
7. Al-Hazmi M. Saudi national survey of children with disability. Riyadh: Prince Salman Centre for Disability Research Press, 2000, 229 p.
8. Al-Jadid M.S. Disability trends in Saudi Arabia: Prevalence and causes. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2014, vol. 93 (suppl. 1), S47–S49. DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000000022 
9. Al-Jadid M.S. Disability in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal, 2013, vol. 34, no. 5,
   pp. 453–460. URL: https://europepmc.org/article/med/23677260 (Accessed: 23.09.2020).
10. Almosa N.A. History of special education in Saudi Arabia. Riyadh: Al Mumtaz for publication, 1992, 339 p.
11. Alnahdi G.H. Educational change in Saudi Arabia. Journal of International Education Research, 2014, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.19030/jier.v10i1.8342.
12. Alquraini T. Special Education in Saudi Arabia: Challenges, perspectives, future possibilities. International Journal of Special Education, 2011, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 149–159. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ909292 (Accessed: 23.09.2020).
13. Alotaibi A.Z. Perception of low vision students in Saudi Arabia regarding their integration into regular schools. Nigerian Journal of Medical Rehabilitation (NJMR), 2006, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 46–61. DOI: 10.34058/njmr.v11i2.18 .
14. Alsalem M. Considering and supporting the implementation of universal design for learning among teachers of students who are deaf and hard of hearing in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation). USA: University of Kansas, 2015, 223 p.
15. Al-Salman A.S.A. Design of a Computerized Arabic Braille Environment Research project, 2002–2005. URL: http://www.pscdr.org.sa/en/research/Pages/ Completed Research.aspx (Accessed: 02.09.2020).
16. Al-Sukait S. Disability at Al-Qaseem region. Riyadh: Prince Salman Center for Disability Research Press, 2007, 178 p.
17. Ayers M., Clark D., Murray A. Perspectives on behaviour: A Practical guide to effective interventions for teachers. London: David Fulton, 1995, 128 p.
18. Bassey M. Case study research. In M. Coleman, A.R. Briggs (eds.), Research Methods in Educational Leadership and Management, London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 2002,
    312 p.
19. Bell J. Doing your research project: A guide for first time researchers in education, health and social science (4th ed.) Buckingham: Open University Press, 2005, 288 p.
20. Blatchford P., Russell R., Basset P. et al. The role and effects of teaching assistants in English primary schools (years 4 to 6) 2000–2003: Results from the Class Size and Pupil-Adult Ratios (CSPAR). KS2 Project. British Educational Research Journal, 2007, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 5-26. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30032721 (Accessed: 02.09.2020).
21. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979, 349 p.
22. Bryman A. Social research methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 824 p.
23. Canter L., Canter M. Assertive discipline: A take-charge approach for today’s educator, Los Angeles: Canter and Associates, 1982, 484 p.
24. Crotty M. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process, 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications, 2003, 256 p.
25. Davis P., Florian L., Ainscow M. et al. Teaching strategies and approaches for pupils with special educational needs: A Scoping Study, Department for Education and Skills. Norwich: HMSO, 2004, 90 p.
26. Denzin N.K. Interpretive interactionism. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 2001, 208 p.
27. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications, 2003, 696 p.
28. Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. London: SAGE, 2011, 784 p.
29. Department of Education and Science (DES). Special educational needs (The Warnock Report). HMSO, 1978, 416 p.
30. Denscombe M. The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. 4th ed. Buckingham, London, UK: Open University Press, 2010, 389 p.
31. Emde R.N. Mobilizing fundamental modes of development--an essay on empathic availability and therapeutic action. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1990, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 881–913. DOI: 10.1177/000306519003800402
32. Fahey A., Carr A. Prevention of adjustment difficulties in children with sensory impairments. In A. Carr (ed.), Prevention: What works with children and adolescents?
    A critical review of psychological prevention programmes for children, adolescents and their families. Hove: Brunner-Routledge, 2002, pp. 83–106.
33. Finkelstein V. Attitudes and disabled people: issues for discussion, 1982. URL: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/finkelstein/attitudes.pdf (Accessed: 18.12.2020).
34. Finkelstein V. The social model of disability repossessed, 2001. URL: http: //www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-udies/archiveuk/finkelstein/soc%20mod% 20 repossessed. pdf (Accessed: 18.12.2020).
35. Fleming N.D., Mills C. Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection, VARK for Teachers, VARK Study Strategies, AAHE’s Focus on Learning, 1998, vol. 7. The National Teaching & Learning Forum, Atlanta. URL: http://ntlf.com/html/pi/9805/toc.htm (Accessed: 18.12.2020).
36. Ghaly M.M.  Islam en handicap: praktijkthema’s en islamitische opvattingen. In Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidszorg en Ethiek, jaargang, 2007, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 40–45.
37. Gogate P., Gilbert C. Blindness in children: a worldwide perspective Community Eye Health Journal, 2007, vol. 20, no. 62, pp. 32–33.
38. Goodley D. Towards socially just pedagogies: deleuzoguattarian critical disability studies, 2011. [http://www.shef.ac.uk/applieddisabilitystudies/] Revised paper submitted for Special Number of International Journal of Inclusive Education entitled: Pedagogies: Matters of Social Justice and Inclusion. URL: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/goodley/Dan%20Goodley%20revised%20submission%20for%20IJIE%20special%20issue.pdf (Accessed: 12.02.2020).
39. Gray C., McIlmoyle J. Training and the early years professional: Understanding visual impairment. International Journal of Early Years Education, 2005, vol. 6, no. 3,
    pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/09669760500048261
40. Grix J. The Foundations of Research [Palgrave study guides], Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004, 224 p.
41. Khodeer M.M., Al-Biblawy I.A. The visually handicapped learners of Saudi Arabia, Journal of Special Education Needs, 2004, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 47–59.
42. Madi S.M., Mandy A., Aranda K. The perception of disability among mothers living with a child with Cerebral Palsy in Saudi Arabia. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2019, vol. 6, pp.1–11. DOI: 10.1177/2333393619844096
43. Nader A. Special Education in Saudi Arabia. British Journal of Special Education, 1980, Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 30–41.
44. Opie J. Educating students with vision impairment today: Consideration of the expanded core curriculum. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 2018, vol. 36, no. 1,
    pp. 75–89. DOI: 10.1177/0264619617730861.
45. Salim S.B.M. Information Services Directed to Persons with Disabilities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Research project, 1999–2000. URL: http: // www.pscdr.org.sa /en/research/Pages/CompletedResearch.aspx (Accessed: 02.06.2020]
46. Smith M.K. Social justice and disability: competing interpretations of the medical and social models. In K. Kristiansen, S. Vehmas, and T. Shakespeare (eds.), Arguing about Disability: Philosophical Perspectives (pp. 15–29). Abington, UK: Routledge, 2009.
47. Smith A. Access, participation, and progress in the general education curriculum in the least restrictive environment for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 2006, vol. 31, no. 4 pp. 331–337. DOI: 10.1177/154079690603100407
48. Stenhouse L. An introduction to curriculum research and development, London: Heinemann, 1975, 248 p.
49. Stake R. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995, 192 p.
50. Tabbara K.F., Badr I.A. Changing pattern of childhood blindness in Saudi Arabia. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1985, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 312–315. DOI: 10.1136/ bjo.69.4.312
51. Tabbara K.F. Blindness in the eastern Mediterranean countries. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2001, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 771–775. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.7.771
52. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. Education for all global monitoring report: education for all by 2015. will we make it? Paris: UNESCO; Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007, 516 p.
53. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. Education for all global monitoring report. overcoming inequality: why governance matters. Paris: UNESCO; Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2008, 477 p.
54. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. International Bureau of Education. Conclusions and recommendations of the 48th session of the International conference on education. Geneva, Switzerland: UNESCO IBE (ED/BIE/ CONFINTED 48/5), 2008, 162 p.
55. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. International Bureau of Education. Inclusive education: the way of the future, pp. 13–19. Geneva, Switzerland: UNESCO IBE (ED/BIE/CONFINTED 48/3), 2008, 31 p.
56. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. The Dakar Framework for Action. World Education Forum, Dakar, Senegal, 26-28 April, (ED-2000/WS/27), 2000, 78 p.