A Questionnaire for the Assessment of Pragmatic Competence in Children Aged 5-8

100

Abstract

The work aims to test a new questionnaire for parents and educators to assess the pragmatic competence of children from 5 to 8 years old. Parents of 753 children and teachers of 903 children from preschool institutions took part in the testing, filling out the proposed questionnaire online. Subsequently, after the initial analysis, 674 parent questionnaires remained in the work, of which 287 questionnaires were from parents of five-year-old children (130 of them boys), 213 from parents of six-year-old children (108 boys), 131 from parents of seven-year-old children (60 boys) and 43 from parents of eight-year-old children (21 boys). And also 903 questionnaires of preschool teachers (at this stage we did not include a survey of school teachers): 487 children of 5 years old (214 boys), 409 children of 6 years old (206 boys) and 7 children of 7 years old (4 boys). Statistical analysis of the material included: 1) checking for normality of the distribution of answers; 2) analysis for consistency of the entire questionnaire, its scales and individual questions; 3) exploratory factor analysis; 4) confirmatory factor analysis; 5) identifying gender differences for each of the questions using the Mann-Whitney test. The study showed that the pragmatic competence of children includes: 1) understanding of the literal and figurative meaning of statements; 2) mastery of non-verbal means of communication; 3) communication skills: politeness, openness to communication, adequate response to the expectations of the interlocutor; 4) development of verbal creativity in various genres, including fantasy. The results of the analysis showed that girls’ pragmatic competence at the age of 5-8 years was better developed than boys, however, in general, in normatively developing children by the age of 5, the main aspects of pragmatic competence have already been developed, and in the future may deteriorate, but understanding the figurative meaning of statements continues to develop at school. This questionnaire requires some refinement and testing for test-retest and external validity.

General Information

Keywords: pragmatic competence, questionnaire, pragmatics, childhood, communication, language in a social context

Journal rubric: Methods and Techniques

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2024130109

Funding. The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (number 23-78-30005)

Received: 09.09.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Oshchepkova E.S., Kartushina N.A., Tarasova K.S. A Questionnaire for the Assessment of Pragmatic Competence in Children Aged 5-8 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Klinicheskaia i spetsial'naia psikhologiia = Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 2024. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 128–154. DOI: 10.17759/cpse.2024130109. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Alikin I.A., Luk'yanchenko N.V. Sotsial'no-normativnaya povozrastnaya dinamika roditel'skogo otnosheniya k detyam [Social-normative age-specific dynamics of parental attitudes towards children]. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 2012, no. 10 (18), pp. 23–38. (In Russ.)
  2. Arutyunova N.D. Pragmatika [Pragmatics]. In Yartseva V.N. (Ed.): Bol’shoi Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' [Encyclopedic Dictionary of Linguistics]. Moscow, 1998. P. 389–390. (In Russ.)
  3. Akhutina T.V. Neirolingvisticheskii analiz leksiki, semantiki i pragmatiki [Neurolinguistic analysis of vocabulary, semantics and pragmatics]. Moscow: Publ. house Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2014. 422 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Bezrukikh M.M., Verba A.S., Filippova T.A., Ivanov V.V. Rechevoe razvitie i formirovanie sotsial'no-kommunikativnykh navykov v starshem doshkol'nom vozraste [Developing speech and socio-communicative skills in older preschool children]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Psychological Journal, 2021. Vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 5–17. DOI: 10.21702/rpj.2021.4.1 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  5. Bodalev A.A. Psikhologiya obshcheniya. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. [Psychology of communication. Encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow: Publ. Cogito-centre, 2015. 671 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Bolotnova N.S. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta [Communicative stylistics of text]. Moscow: Flinta Publ., 381 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Bolotova A.K., Zhukov Yu.M. Psikhologiya kommunikatsii [Psychology of Communications]. Moscow: Publ. house HSE, 2015. 495 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Vartanova I.I. Vozrastnaya spetsifika vzaimosvyazi emotsional'nogo i ponyatiinogo komponentov shkol'noi motivatsii [Age specificity of the relationship between the emotional and conceptual components of learning motivation]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya = Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. Series 14. Psychology, 2022. No. 2, pp. 108–127. DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2022.02.05 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  9. Vronskaia I.V., Kozina E.E. K probleme razvitiya emotsional'nogo intellekta starshikh doshkol'nikov v protsesse obucheniya angliiskomu yazyku [On the problem of the development of emotional intelligence of older preschoolers in the process of learning English]. Sovremennoe doshkol'noe obrazovanie = Preschool Education Today, Vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 40–55. DOI: 10.24412/1997-9657-2022-5113-40-55 (In Russ)
  10. Vygotskii L.S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6 t. T.3. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki [Collected Works: in 6 vol. Vol.3. Problems of development of the mind]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 369 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Dem'yankov V.Z. Transfer znanii i perenosnoe znachenie [Transfer of knowledge and figurative meaning]. In L.P. Kiyashchenko (Ed.): Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya kul'turnogo transfera: filosofiya, lingvistika, meditsina = Interdisciplinary studies of cultural transfer: philosophy, linguistics, medicine. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy RAS, 2020. Pp. 76–94. (In Russ.)
  12. Dovolnova I.V. Spetsifika proyavlenii initsiativnosti mal'chikami i devochkami doshkol'nogo i mladshego shkol'nogo vozrasta v sotsiokul'turnoi srede [The specifics of the manifestations of initiative by boys and girls of preschool and primary school age in the socio-cultural environment]. Sovremennoe doshkol'noe obrazovanie = Preschool Education Today, No. 1 (17), pp.54–64. DOI: 10.24412/2782-4519-2023-1115-54-64 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  13. Donskaya K.M. Pragmaticheskii aspekt neverbal'nykh sredstv obshcheniya [Pragmatic aspect of nonverbal means of communication]. In A.I. Bochkarev, A.A. Getman (Eds.): Semioticheskoe prostranstvo yazyka. Sinkhroniya i diakhroniya = Semiotic space of language. Synchrony and diachrony. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Technical University, 2017. Pp. 217–222. (In Russ.)
  14. Eliseeva M.B., Vershinina E.A., Ryskina V.L. Makarturovskii oprosnik: russkaya versiya. Otsenka rechevogo i kommunikativnogo razvitiya detei rannego vozrasta. Normy razvitiya. Obraztsy analiza. Kommentarii. [MacArthur Questionnaire: Russian version. Assessing the speech and communication development of young children. Development norms. Analysis samples. Comments]. Ivanovo: LISTOS Publ., 2021. 75 p. (In Russ.)
  15. Erastova D.A. Osvoenie idiomatiki rodnogo yazyka v ontogeneze. Diss. ... kand. philol. nauk [Mastering the idioms of the native language in ontogenesis. PhD (Philology) Thesis]. Moscow, 2023. 280 p. (In Russ.)
  16. Zimnyaya I.A. Klyuchevye kompetentnosti kak rezul'tativno–tselevaya osnova kompetentnostnogo podkhoda v obrazovanii [Key competencies as a result-target basis of a competency-based approach in education]. Moscow: Publ. Moskovskii issledovatel'skii tsentr podgotovki spetsialistov, 2004. 38 p. (In Russ.)
  17. Zubarev S.N. Metody otsenki sformirovannosti kommunikativnoi kompetentsii [Methods for assessing the development of communicative competence]. Istoricheskaya i sotsial'no-obrazovatel'naya mysl' = Historical and socio-educational thought, Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 146–148. DOI: 10.17748/2075-9908-2015-7-1-146-148 (In Russ.)
  18. Iriskhanova K.M. Kompetentnostnaya model' vladeniya i ovladeniya inostrannym yazykom [Competence model of proficiency and acquisition of a foreign language]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University, 2008, no. 546, pp. 5–17. (In Russ.)
  19. Kabardov M.K. Kommunikativnye sposobnosti [Communication skills]. In A.A. Bodalev (Ed.): Psikhologiya obshcheniya. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' = Psychology of communication. Encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow: Publ. Cogito-Centre, 2015. (In Russ.)
  20. Karpik O.A. Sposoby otsenki urovnya razvitiya kommunikativnoi kompetentnosti [Methods for assessing the level of development of communicative competence]. URL: https://nsportal.ru/nachalnaya-shkola/raznoe/2017/05/13/sposoby-otsenki-urovnya-razvitiya-kommunikativnoy-kompetentnosti (accessed 08.09.2023) (In Russ.)
  21. Kuznetsova E.V., Mezentseva O.I., Petrovskaya V.G., Stepanova L.N. Intensifikatsiya protsessa formirovaniya professional'noi kompetentnosti pedagoga-psikhologa: monografiya [Intensification of the process of developing professional competence of a teacher-psychologist]. Novosibirsk: Publ. NSPU, 2013. 159 p. (In Russ.)
  22. Kunitsyna V.N., Kazarinova N.V., Pogol'sha V.M. Mezhlichnostnoe obshchenie [Interpersonal communication]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2001. 544 p. (In Russ.)
  23. Lidskaya E.V., Panov, V.I. Ekopsikhologicheskie vzaimodeistviya detei rannego vozrasta s drugimi sub"ektami sotsial'noi sredy [Ecopsychological interactions of young children with other subjects of the social environment]. Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal = National Psychological Journal, 2022. No. 3, pp. 108–118. DOI: 10.11621/npj.2022.0313 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  24. Lisina M.I. Problemy ontogeneza obshcheniya [Problems of the ontogeny of communication]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1986.
  25. Melehin A. Osobennosti pragmaticheskoi funktsii rechi v pozdnem vozraste: printsipy diagnostiki i puti vosstanovleniya [Specificity of pragmatic features of language in elderly age: principles of diagnosis and direction of therapy]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 39–52. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2017060305. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  26. Nefedov S.T., Chernyavskaya V.E. Kontekst v lingvisticheskom analize: pragmaticheskaya i diskursivno-analiticheskaya perspektiva [Context in Linguistics: Pragmatic and Discourse Analytical Dimensions]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya = Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, No. 63, pp. 83–97. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/63/5
  27. Oshchepkova E.S., Bukhalenkova D.A. Longityudnoe issledovanie narrativov u detei 5–6 let [Longitudinal study of narratives in children 5-6 years old]. In: Vyzovy i trendy mirovoi lingvistiki: Kazanskii mezhdunarodnyi lingvisticheskii sammit: trudy i materialy = Challenges and trends in world linguistics: Kazan International Linguistic Summit: proceedings and materials.2. Kazan': Publ. KFU, 2021. Pp. 158–160. URL: https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/handle/net/175041 (accessed 08.09.2023)
  28. Petrovskaya L.A. Obshchenie – kompetentnost' – trening: Izbrannye trudy [Communication – competence – training: Selected works]. Ed. O.V. Solovyeva. Moscow: Smysl Publ. 2007. 687 p.
  29. Rychkova O.V., Kholmogorova A.B. Osnovnye teoreticheskie podkhody k issledovaniyu narushenii sotsial'nogo poznaniya pri shizofrenii: sovremennyi status i perspektivy razvitiya [The main theoretical approaches to the study of disorders of social cognition in schizophrenia: current status and prospects of development]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2014. Vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 30–43. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  30. Sangadzhieva N.A. Podkhod k otsenke kommunikativnoi kompetentsii v interaktivnoi igre [An approach to assessing communicative competence in an interactive game]. Innovatsionnaya nauka = Journal of Innovative Science, 2015. No. 8–1. p. 142–147. (In Russ.)
  31. Smirnova E. O. Vliyanie obshcheniya rebenka so vzroslym na effektivnost' obucheniya doshkol'nikov: Diss. … kand. psikhol. nauk. [The influence of a child’s communication with an adult on the effectiveness of preschoolers’ learning. PhD (Psychology) Thesis]. Moscow, 1977.
  32. Fomina N. A., Arutyunyan T. A. Osobennosti obshchitel'nosti i trevozhnosti podrostkov [Peculiarities of sociability and anxiety in adolescents]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika = RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, No. 3, pp. 61–67. (In Russ.)
  33. Shlykova D.V. Problemy shkol'noi adaptatsii detei [Problems of school adaptation of children]. Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 40, no. 4, pp.111–121. (In Russ.)
  34. Arcara G., Bambini V. A Test for the Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates (APACS): Normative Data and Psychometric Properties. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 70, no.7. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00070
  35. Baltaxe C.A. Pragmatic deficits in the language of autistic adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 176–180.
  36. Baron-Cohen S. Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective? Journal of autism and developmental disorders, Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 379–402.
  37. Bates E. Acquisition of pragmatic competence. Journal of Child Language, Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 277–281.
  38. Bishop, D.V. Development of the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC): A method for assessing qualitative aspects of communicative impairment in children. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 1998. Vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 879–891. DOI: 10.1017/S0021963098002832
  39. Compas B.E., Connor-Smith J.K., Saltzman H. et al. Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological bulletin, Vol. 127, no. 1, p. 87. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87
  40. David-Barrett T., Kertesz J., Rotkirch A. et al. Communication with family and friends across the life course. PloS one. Vol. 11, no. 11, P. e0165687.
  41. Ducerf C. Évaluation de la pragmatique d'enfants tout-venant et sourds de 3 à 7 ans. Sciences cognitives. 2013. dumas-00873419. URL: https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-00873419/document (accessed 15.03.2024)
  42. Gentilleau-Lambin P., Nicli J., Richard A.F. et al. Assessment of conversational pragmatics: A screening tool for pragmatic language impairment in a control population of children aged 6–12 years. Archives de Pédiatrie, Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 214–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2019.03.004
  43. Goberis D., Goberis B., Dalpes A., Baca Y.I. Social communication skills — the pragmatics checklist. URL: https://successforkidswithhearingloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/PRAGMATICS-CHECKLIST2.pdf (accessed 15.03.2024)
  44. Green B.C., Johnson K.A., Bretherton L. Pragmatic language difficulties in children with hyperactivity and attention problems: An integrated review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, Vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 15–29. DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12056
  45. Hay J. The pragmatics of humor support. International Journal of Humor Research, 2001. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 55–82. DOI: 10.1515/humr.14.1.55
  46. Helland W. A., Aaland E., Furebotn K.L. et al. (2024). Investigating pragmatic abilities in 5- to 7-year-old Norwegian children: A study using the Pragma test. First Language, 2024. Vol. 18. DOI: 10.1177/01427237241239114
  47. Ifantidou E. Pragmatic competence and relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014. 228 p.
  48. Labov W. Some Principles of Linguistic Methodology. Language in society. Vol. 1. No. 1. NY: Cambridge University Press, 1972. P. 97–120.
  49. Morris C.W. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. International encyclopedia of unified science. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1938. 59 p.
  50. Odintsova M.A., Lubovsky D.V., Ivanova P.A., Gusarova E.S. Special Characteristics of the Resilience of Russian Families in the Face of Modern Challenges (A Preliminary Study). Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2022. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 56–74. DOI: 10.11621/pir.2022.0304
  51. Pearson B., de Villiers P. Discourse, Narrative and Pragmatic Development. In J.L. Mey (Ed.): Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006. Pp. 686–693.
  52. Pesco D., O'Neill D. Assessing Early Language Use by French-Speaking Canadian Children: Introducing the LUI-French. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, Vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 198–217.
  53. Pincus D. B., Friedman A. G. Improving children’s coping with everyday stress: Transporting treatment interventions to the school setting. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, Vol. 7, pp. 223–240. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-004-6087-8
  54. Pousset M. Création et étalonnage d’un questionnaire de dépistage des troubles de la pragmatique chez des enfants de CE1-CE2. Sciences cognitives, dumas-03981349. URL: https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-03981349 (accessed 15.03.2024)
  55. Shiyan O.A. The Funny and the Scary in Children’s Narratives: The Cognitive Aspect. New Ideas in Child and Educational Psychology, Vol. 3, no. 3–4, pp. 38–50. DOI: 10.11621/ nicep.2022.0303
  56. Staikova E., Gomes H., Tartter V. et al. Pragmatic deficits and social impairment in children with ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 1275–1283. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12082
  57. Stern D.N. The first relationship: Mother and infant. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977. 160 p.
  58. Taguchi N. Pragmatic competence. NY: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. 385 p.

Information About the Authors

Ekaterina S. Oshchepkova, PhD in Philology, PhD, senior researcher, labarotary of child's psychology and digital socialization, Federal Scientific Center for Psychological and Interdisciplinary Research (FSC PMI), Researcher, Department of Psychology of Education and Pedagogy, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6199-4649, e-mail: oshchepkova_es@iling-ran.ru

Natalia A. Kartushina, PhD in Psychology, Researcher, Department of Psychology of Education and Pedagogy, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Post-Doc researcher, Faculty of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4650-5832, e-mail: natalia.kartushina@psykologi.uio.no

Kristina S. Tarasova, PhD in Psychology, Scientific Researcher, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9072-8761, e-mail: christinap@bk.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 260
Previous month: 37
Current month: 30

Downloads

Total: 100
Previous month: 15
Current month: 7