The Effectiveness of Teaching Chess and Attitudes Toward the Subject in Educational Groups Using a Game-Based Approach to Learning

The purpose of the study is to identify the impact of the use of educational games in chess lessons as a general education subject on the solution of chess problems and students’ attitudes towards the subject. We hypothesized, drawing from the classic works of L.S. Vygostky, Elkonin, R.M. Ryan, E. Deci, and others, that educational games successfully shape educational motivation in chess lessons among younger schoolchildren. By conducting a comparative analysis of gaming and traditional approaches, considering their impact on the teaching of chess and students' attitudes towards the subject, we can significantly enhance student motivation and educational initiative, thereby improving the quality of chess teaching. This can be achieved by incorporating scientifically based teaching technologies into the educational process. Methods. One of the schools in the Republic of Armenia tested the chess game method of teaching. Four second graders participated in the experiment. The same teacher taught the subject of chess in all classes. We define two classes as control classes, where we taught chess using the usual or traditional method, and the other two classes as experimental classes, where we taught chess using a new game method. Eight students were members of a chess school or club. We did not consider their results when processing the experimental data. We conducted the experiment for nine months, from September 2021 to May 2022. Results and conclusions. Analysis of the characteristics demonstrated a fundamental difference between learning with game elements and the traditional approach, particularly in terms of the parameters of social interaction in learning, where the game approach offers significant advantages. Given the impact of the game approach on chess teaching attitudes, we found that the experimental group had a higher percentage of students (96.0%) wishing for "more chess lessons" compared to the control group (69.4%), and a lower percentage (4.0%) wishing for "as many chess lessons as there are now" compared to the control group (27.4%). The z-test comparing proportions in Table 5 showed that the identified differences in attitudes were statistically significant at the 95% level. The data we obtained allows us to confirm the hypothesis that the gaming method of teaching creates more positive attitudes towards chess lessons.

1. Vygotskii L.S. Igra i ee rol' v psikhicheskom razvitii rebenka [The Game and Its Role in the Mental Development of the Child]. Voprosy psikhologii = Psychology issues, 1966, № 6, 62—76. (In Russ.).
2. Vygotskii L.S. Problema obuchenia i umstvennogo razvitiya v shkol'nom vozraste [The Problem of Teaching and Mental Development at School Age]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie=Psychological Science and Education, 1996, № 4, pp. 5—18.
3. Gevorkyan S.R., Manukyan S.A., Sarkisyan V.Zh. Vliyanie uchebnoi deyatel'nosti i ustanovok uchashchikhsya nachal'noi shkoly na uchebnye dostizheniya po shakhmatam [The Impact оf Students’ Attitudesаnd Learning Activities оn the Chess Academic Achievements in Primary Schools]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2023, vol. 28, № 5, pp. 100—113. DOI:17759/pse.2023280508 (In Russ.).
4. Gosudarstvennyi standart obrazovaniya [State educational standard]. 2021. URL: https://www.arlis.am/ documentview.aspx?docid=149788
5. Glukhova O.V., Volikova S.V., Zaretskii Yu.V., Zaretskii V.K. Rezul'taty longityudnogo diagnosticheskogo issledovaniya po proektu «Shakhmaty dlya obshchego razvitiya» [The Results of a Longi-tudinal Diagnostic Study on the Project «Chess For Overall Development»]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2022, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 49—75. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2022300404 (In Russ.).
6. Leont'ev N.A., Problemy razvitiya psikhiki [Problems of The Development Of The Mind]. Akademiya pedagogicheskikh nauk=Academy of Pedagogical Sciences, 1959, 478 p.
7. Obukhova L.F., Tkachenko S.B. Vozmozhnosti ispol'zovaniya komp'yuternykh igr dlya razvitiya pertseptivnykh deistvii [Possibilities of computer games application for development of perceptual actions]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie= Psychological Science and Education, 2008, vol. 13, № 3, pp. 49—61.
8. Rubtsov V.V., Ulanovskaya I.M. Razvitie sotsial'nykh kompetentsii u mladshikh shkol'nikov v shkolakh s raznymi sposobami organizatsii uchebnykh vzaimodeistvii [Development of Social Competencies of Primary School Children in Schools with Different Ways of Organizing Educational Interactions]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya=Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2021, vol. 17, № 2, pp. 50—58. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2021170205
9. Salmina N.G., Tikhanova I.G., Chernaya O.V. Postroenie razvivayushchikh programm s ispol'zovaniem nastol'nykh igr [Creation of Developing Curricula Using the Board Games]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie= Psychological Science and Education, 2011, vol. 16, № 2, pp. 55¾
10. Sarkisyan V.Zh., Manukyan S.A., Ispiryan M.M., Gevorkyan L.L., Khachatryan E.A. Metodologiya issledovaniya vliyaniya psikhologicheskikh kharakteristik uchenikov pri obuchenii shakhmatam [The Influence of Students’ Psychological Characteristics on the Results of Learning Chess]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 97¾123. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2022300406 (In Russ.).
11. Smirnova E.O., Sokolova M.V., Sheina E.G. Podkhody k ponimaniyu igry v sovremennoi zapadnoi psikhologii [Approaches to the notion of a play in contemporary foreign psychology]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya= Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2012, vol. 1, № 1, pp. 53¾
12. Tsukerman G.A., Obukhova O.L., Shibanova N.A. Igra i uchebnaya deyatel'nost': pogranichnye konflikty [Play and Learning Activity: Borderline Conflicts]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya=Psychological-Educational Studies, 2019, vol. 11, № 4, pp. 22¾ DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2019110402
13. Elkonin D.B. Psihologija igri. М.: Vlados, 1999. 360 p.
14. Dewey J. Experience and education. NY: Simon & Schuster, 1938, 96
15. Gee J.P. The Anti-Education Era: Creating Smarter Students Through Digital Learning. NY: St. Martin's Press, 2013. 240 p.
16. Gobet F., Voogt de Al., Retschitzki J. Moves in Mind, The Psychology of Board Games. NY: Psychology Press, 2004. 288 p.
17. Goncu A. Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives. NY: Cambridge University Press Groos, 1999. 269 p.
18. Khachatryan H., Khachatryan S., Movsisyan N. Elements of Critical Thinking in the School Standards of "Chess" Subject. International Journal Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis (SPE), 2021, vol. 1, pp. 105-118.
19. Mead G.H. Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. University of Chicago Press, 1934. 437 p.
20. Montessori M. The Montessori method: Scientific pedagogy as applied to child education in "The Children's Houses". NY: Frederick A. Stokes Company, 1912. 454 p.
21. Piaget J. Play, dreams, and imitate in childhood. London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1951. 308
22. Piaget J. The stages of the intellectual development of the child. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 1962, vol. 26 (3), pp.120—128.
23. Ryan R.M., Rigby C. S., & Przybylski A. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 2006, vol. 30 (4), 347—363
24. Steinkuehler C., & Squire K. Video Games and Learning: Teaching and Participatory Culture in the Digital Age. NY: Teachers College Press, 272 p.