Features of Relationship between Moral Judgments and Mental Model (on the Example of Adults with ASD)

The deficit of theory of mind (ToM) is considered by a number of authors as one of the risk factors for involvement in criminal activity for individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) (for example because of difficulties in understanding other people’s intentions). The relationship between the deficit of ToM and moral judgments is discussed. The methods of test diagnostics (“Moral dilemmas”, A-ToM) and the method of content analysis of answers to open questions on moral dilemmas were used. It is shown that individuals with ASD are less likely to give utilitarian answers to impersonal dilemmas, but regardless of the intact of ToM, there is a tendency to reduce the degree of utilitarianism from impersonal to personal dilemmas. It is also shown that individuals with ASD do not rely on the intentions of actors when reasoning about moral dilemmas, but not only individuals with ASD rely on conse-quences in such reasoning.

1. Enikolopov S.N., Medvedeva T.I., Vorontsova O.Yu. Moral’nye dilemmy i osobennosti lichnosti [Moral Dilemmas and Personality Traits] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i parvo= Psychology and Law, 2019. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 141—155. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2019090210 (In Russ.).
2. Blair R.J. Brief report: morality in the autistic child. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 1996. Vol. 26, pp. 571—579. doi:10.1007/BF02172277
3. Brewer N., Young R., Barnett E. Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 2017. Vol. 47, pp. 1927—1941. doi:10.1007/s10803-017-3080-x
4. Fede S.J., Kiehl K.A. Meta-analysis of the moral brain: patterns of neural engagement assessed using multilevel kernel density analysis. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 2020. Vol. 14, pp. 534—547. doi:10.1007/s11682-019-00035-5
5. Galotti K.M. Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 1989. Vol. 105, pp. 331—351. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.331
6. Greene J.D., et al. Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 2008. Vol. 107, pp. 1144—1154. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004
7. Greene J.D., et al. Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition, 2009. Vol. 111, pp. 364—371. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.001
8. Hauser M., Cushman F., Young L. A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications.  Mind and Language, 2007. Vol. 22, pp. 1—21. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00297.x
9. Hu Y., Pereira A.M. et al. Right Temporoparietal Junction Underlies Avoidance of Moral Transgression in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Neuroscience, 2021. Vol. 41, pp. 1699—1715. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1237-20.2020
10. Rest J.R. Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979. 305 p.
11. Richell R.A. et al. Theory of mind and psychopathy: can psychopathic individuals read the “language of the eyes”? Neuropsychologia, 2003. Vol. 41, pp. 523—526. doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00175-6
12. Ringshaw J.E., Hamilton K., Malcolm-Smith S. Theory of Mind and Moral Decision-Making in the Context of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2021. Vol. 22, pp. 316—327. doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05055-z
13. Riva P., Manfrinati A., Sacchi S. et al. Selective changes in moral judgment by noninvasive brain stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2019. Vol. 19, pp. 797—810. doi:10.3758/s13415-018-00664-1
14. Weisberg D.S., Leslie A. The role of victims’ emotions in preschoolers’ moral judgments. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2012. Vol. 3, pp. 439—455. doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0101-8
15. Young L. et al. The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. Vol. 104, pp. 8235—8240. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701408104