Obedience and Disobedience in the Understanding of Russian Students: An Exploratory Study

The aim of the presented exploratory study was to reveal the social representations of obedience and disobedience among Russian students (N=189, aged from 18 to 25). Following the ideas of the social representations theory, mainly of the structural approach it was shown that the representations of obedience was crystallised around the elements related to power. Obedience and disobedience are composed with the element of different connotation, namely: the representation of obedience was composed by the elements evaluated neutrally, the representation of disobedience was composed by the elements predominantly with negative valence. The obtained results are discussed in line with the ideas of the theory of social representations, the comparison with results obtained in other cultures are made.

1. Vezhbitskaya A. Ponimaniye kul'tur cherez posredstvo klyuchevykh slov [Understanding cultures through keywords]. Moscow:YAzyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2001. 288 p. (In Russ.).
2. Kondrat'yev M.YU. Slagayemyye avtoriteta [Authority terms]. Moscow: Znaniye, 1988. 80 p. (In Russ.).
3. Milgram S. Podchineniye avtoritetu [Submission to authority]. Moscow.: ANF.2016. 282 p. (In Russ.).
4. Milgram S. Eksperiment v sotsial'noy psikhologii [Experiment in social psychology]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2000. 336 p. (In Russ.).
5. Politicheskaya psikhologiya [Political psychology] / pod obshchey red. A.A. Derkacha, V.I. Zhukova, L.G. Lapteva. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proyekt, 2001. 858 p.(In Russ.).
6. Abric J.-C. A structural approach to social representations. In: K. Deaux, G. Philogène (eds.). Representations of the social: bridging theoretical traditions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001. pp. 42-47.
7. Baumrind D. Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram's "Behavioral Study of Obedience". American Psychologist,1964. Vol.19, pp.421–423. DOI:10.1037/h0040128
8. Beauvois J.-L., Courbet D., Oberlé D. The prescriptive power of the television host. A transposition of Milgram’s obedience paradigm to the context of TV game show. European Review of Applied Psychology, 2012. Vol. 62, pp.111-119. 
9. Burger J.M. Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 2009. Vol.64, pp. 1–11.
10. De Rosa A.S. Le «réseau d’associations» comme méthode d’étude dans la recherche sur les RS: structure, contenus et polarité du champ sémantique. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 1995. Vol. 28, pp. 96-122. 
11. Doise W.  Les représentations sociales: définition d’un concept. In W. Doise, A. Palmonari (eds.). L’étude des représentations sociales. Neuchâtel: Delachaux & Niestlé, 1986, pp.86-98. 
12. Empirical approaches to social representations / G. Breakwell & D. Canter (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. 350 p. 
13. Fattoria F., Curlyb S., Jörchelb A.C., Pozzi M., Mihalitsb D., Alfieria S. Authority Relationship From a Societal Perspective: Social Representations of Obedience and Disobedience in Austrian Young Adults. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2015. Vol. 11, pp.197–213. DOI:10.5964/ejop.v11i2.883
14. Flament С., Rouquette M.-L. Anatomie des idées ordinaires. Paris: Armand Colin, 2003. 256 p.   
15. Galand C., Salès-Wuillemin E. La représentation des drogues chez les étudiants en psychologie: effets des pratiques de consommation et influence de l'entourage. Les cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 2009. Vol.84, pp.125-152.
16. Haslam A.S., Stephen D. R.,  Birney M.E. Nothing by mere authority: Evidence that in an experimental analogue of the Milgram paradigm participants are motivated not by orders but by appeals to science. Journal of Social Issues, 2014. Vol.70, pp. 473-488.
17. Le Texier T. Histoire d’un mensonge.Enquête sur l'expérience de Stanford. Paris: Editions la Découverte, 2018. 295 p.
18. Moliner P., Abric J.-C. Central core theory. In: G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, J. Valsiner (eds.). Cambridge handbooks in psychology. The Cambridge handbook of social representations. Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp.83-95. DOI:10.1017/CBO9781107323650.009
19. Moliner P., Guimelli C. Les représentations sociales. Grenoble : Presses Universitaire de 
20. Grenoble, 2015. 139 p. 
21. Moscovici S. Foreword. In: C.Herzlich (ed.). Health and illness. A social psychological analysis. London: Academic Press, 1973, pp. ix—xiv.   
22. Moscovici S. La Psychanalyse: son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1961, 652 p.   
23. Moscovici S. The phenomenon of social representations. In: G.Duveen (ed.). Social representations: explorations in social psychology. N. Y.: New York University Press, 2000, pp.18-77. 
24. Moscovici S. Why a theory of social representations?. In: K. Deaux, G. Philogène (eds.). Representations of the social: bridging theoretical traditions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001, pp. 18-61. 
25. Pozzi M., Fattori F., Bocchiaro P., Alfieri S. Do the right thing! A study on social representation of obedience and disobedience. New Ideas in Psychology, 2014. Vol.35, pp.18-27.DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.06.002
26. Pozzi M., Quartiroli A., Alfieri S., Fattori F., Pistoni C. (Dis)Obedience in U.S. American Young Adults: A New Way to Describe Authority Relationships. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2018. Vol. 14, pp.404–423.DOI:10.5964/ejop.v14i2.1314
27. Rochat F., Modigliani A. The Ordinary Quality of Resistance: From Milgram's Laboratory to the Village of Le Chambon. Journal of Social Issues, 1995.Vol.51, pp.195-210.
28. Vergès P. L'Évocation de l’argent: une méthode pour la définition du noyau central d’une représentation. Bulletin de psychologie, 1992. T. XLV (405), pp. 203—209.