Place Attachment in Foreign Psychology: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Research

8

Abstract

The article provides an overview of studies of the phenomenon of attachment to place of residence in foreign studies. A comparison of the points of view of foreign researchers on the relationship between the categories “Place Attachment” and “place identity” is carried out. Empirical studies of attachment to place of residence as a factor influencing intergroup relations and environmental behavior of residents in different sociocultural conditions are analyzed. It has been revealed that attachment to place of residence, according to the results of modern research, is a significant factor influencing intergroup relations, however, the characteristics of the influence are determined by the sociocultural context. The results of the analysis showed that the influence of place attachment largely determines pro-environmental behavior in relation to a place that is significant for a person. The article also analyzes the results of empirical studies of predictors of attachment to the place of residence: socio-demographic, socio-psychological, as well as the perception and assessment of the characteristics of the place of residence. It was revealed that, despite a large number of studies on the correlates and predictors of attachment to a place, today there are no scientific theories that explain the psychological mechanisms of a person’s connection with his place of residence.

General Information

Keywords: place attachment, identity with place, predictors of place attachment

Journal rubric: Social Psychology

Article type: review article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2025140108

Funding. The research was funded by Russian Science Foundation and the Kuban Science Foundation, project number 24-18-20075 “Cultural code of the city: visual aspect”.

Received: 23.05.2024

Accepted:

For citation: Tuhina O.R. Place Attachment in Foreign Psychology: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Research [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2025. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 79–87. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2025140108. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Belanche D., Casaló L.V., Rubio, M.Á. Local place identity: A comparison between residents of rural and urban communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 2021. Vol. 82, pp. 242—252. DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.003
  2. Di Masso A., Williams D.R., Raymond C.M. et al. Between fixities and flows: Navigating place attachments in an increasingly mobile world. Journal of environmental psychology, 2019. Vol. 61, pp. 125—133. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.006
  3. Bolan M. The mobility experience and neighborhood attachment. Demography, 1997. Vol. 34, pp. 225—237.
  4. Brown B.B., Perkins D.D., Brown G. Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003. Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 259—271. DOI:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00117-2
  5. Storz N., Martinovic B., Verkuyten M., Žeželj I., Psaltis C., Roccas S. Collective psychological ownership and reconciliation in territorial conflicts. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2020. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 404—425. DOI:10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1145
  6. Daryanto A., Song Z. A meta-analysis of the relationship between place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 2021. Vol. 123, pp. 208—219. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.045
  7. Chen N., Hall C.M., Yu K., Qian C. Environmental satisfaction, residential satisfaction, and place attachment: The cases of long-term residents in rural and urban areas in China. Sustainability, 2019. Vol. 11, no. 22, article ID 6439. 20 p. DOI:10.3390/su11226439
  8. Fried M. Residential attachment: Sources of residential and community satisfaction. Journal of Social Issues, 1982. Vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 107—119. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1982.tb01773.x
  9. Gifford R. The consequences of living in high-rise buildings. Architectural Science Review, 2007. Vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 2—17. DOI:10.3763/asre.2007.5002
  10. Gustafson P. More cosmopolitan, no less local. European Societies, 2009. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 25—47. DOI:10.1080/14616690802209689
  11. Hernández B., Hidalgo M.C., Ruiz C. Theoretical and methodological aspects of research on place attachment. In Manzo L., Devine-Wright P. (eds.), Place attachment. New York: Routledge, 2020, pp. 94—110. DOI:10.4324/9780429274442
  12. Inalhan G., Yang E., Weber C. Place attachment theory. In Appel-Meulenbroek R., Danivska V. (eds.), A handbook of theories on designing alignment between people and the office environment. London/New York: Routledge, 2021, pp. 181—194. DOI:10.1201/9781003128830
  13. Lalli M. Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empiricalfindings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1992. Vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 285—303. DOI:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80078-7
  14. Lewicka M. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of environmental psychology, 2011. Vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 207—230. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
  15. Nartova-Bochaver S., Reznichenko S., Bardadymov V., Khachaturova M., Yerofeyeva V., Khachatryan N., Kryazh I., Kamble S., Zulkarnain Z. Measurement invariance of the short home attachment scale: A cross-cultural study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022. Vol. 13, article ID 834421. 9 p. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834421
  16. Meloni A., Fornara F., Carrus G. Predicting pro-environmental behaviors in the urban context: The direct or moderated effect of urban stress, city identity, and worldviews. Cities, 2019. Vol. 88, pp. 83—90. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.001
  17. Mihaylov N., Perkins D.D. Community Place Attachment and its Role in Social Capital Development. In Manzo L.C., Devine-Wright P. (eds.), Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Research. New York: Routledge, 2014, pp. 61—74.
  18. Morgan P. Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. Journal of environmental psychology, 2010. Vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 11—22. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.07.001
  19. Mouratidis K. Neighborhood characteristics, neighborhood satisfaction, and well-being: The links with neighborhood deprivation. Land Use Policy, 2020. Vol. 99, article ID 104886. 12 p. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104886
  20. Harlan S.L., Larsen L., Hackett E.J. [et al.]. Neighborhood attachment in urban environments: Paper presented at the Annual Sociological Association. 2005 ASA Annual Meeting. Philadelphia: American Sociological Association 2005.
  21. Nijs T., Stark T.H., Verkuyten M. Negative intergroup contact and radical right-wing voting: The moderating roles of personal and collective self-efficacy. Political Psychology, 2019. Vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1057—1073. DOI:10.1111/pops.12577
  22. Othman S., Nishimura Y., Kubota A. Memory association in place making: A review. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013. Vol. 85, pp. 554—563. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.384
  23. Pei Z. Roles of neighborhood ties, community attachment and local identity in residents’ household waste recycling intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019. Vol. 241, article ID 118217. 9 p. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118217
  24. Arani A.Z., Zanjari N., Delbari A., Foroughan M., Ghaedamini Harouni G. Place attachment and aging: A scoping review. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 2022. Vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 91—108. DOI:10.1080/10911359.2020.1860852
  25. Poyrazli S., Devonish O.B. Cultural Value Orientation, Social Networking Site (SNS) Use, and Homesickness in International Students. International Social Science Review, 2020. Vol. 96, no. 3, article ID 2. 22 p.
  26. Pretty G.H., Chipuer H.M., Bramston P. Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: The discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003. Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 273—287. DOI:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00079-8
  27. Reese G., Oettler L.M., Katz L.C. Imagining the loss of social and physical place characteristics reduces place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2019. Vol. 65, article ID 101325. 6 p. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101325
  28. Rollero C., De Piccoli N. Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 198—205. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.12.003
  29. Scopelliti M., Tiberio L. Homesickness in university students: The role of multiple place attachment. Environment and Behavior, 2010. Vol. 42, pp. 335—350. DOI:10.1177/0013916510361872
  30. Sebastien L. The power of place in understanding place attachments and meanings. Geoforum, 2020. Vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 204—216. DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.001
  31. Gillespie J., Cosgrave C., Malatzky C., Carden C. Sense of place, place attachment, and belonging-in-place in empirical research: A scoping review for rural health workforce research. Health & Place, 2022. Vol. 74, article ID 102756. 8 p. DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102756
  32. Song Z., Soopramanien D. Types of place attachment and pro-environmental behaviors of urban residents in Beijin. Cities, 2019. Vol. 84, pp. 112—120. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.012
  33. Strandberg C., Styven M.E. The multidimensionality of place identity: A systematic concept analysis and framework of place-related identity elements. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2024. Vol. 95, article ID 102257. 18 p. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102257
  34. Tartaglia S., Rollero C. Different levels of place identity: from the concrete territory to the social categories. In Valentin J., Gamez L. (eds.), Environmental psychology: New developments. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2010, pp. 243—250.
  35. Gifford R., Scannell L., Kormos C. et al. Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessment: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1—12. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001
  36. Maricchiolo F., Mosca O., Paolini D., Fornara F. The mediating role of place attachment dimensions in the relationship between local social identity and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021. Vol. 12, article ID 645648. 9 p. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645648
  37. Toruńczyk-Ruiz S., Martinović B. The bright and dark sides of length of residence in the neighbourhood: Consequences for local participation and openness to newcomers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2020. Vol. 67, article ID 101383. 12 p. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101383
  38. Tournois L., Rollero C. «Should I stay or should I go?» Exploring the influence of individual factors on attachment, identity and commitment in a post-socialist city. Cities, 2020. Vol. 102, article ID 102740. 10 p. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102740
  39. Ujang N., Zakariya K. Place attachment as indicator for place significance and value. Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies, 2018. Vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 95—103. DOI:10.21834/ajbes.v3i10.84
  40. Vada S., Prentice C., Hsiao A. The influence of tourism experience and well-being on place attachment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2019. Vol. 47, pp. 322—330. DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.12.007
  41. Wnuk A., Oleksy T. Too attached to let others in? The role of different types of place attachment in predicting intergroup attitudes in a conflict setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2021. Vol. 75, article ID 101615. 11 p. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101615

Information About the Authors

Oxana R. Tuhina, Doctor of Psychology, Chair of the Department of Рhysics, Kuban State Technological University, Professor of the Department of Personality Psychology and General Psychology, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5525-7645, e-mail: tuchena@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 18
Previous month: 16
Current month: 2

Downloads

Total: 8
Previous month: 5
Current month: 3