Skip to Main Content

Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology
2021. Vol. 10, no. 2, 86–95
doi:10.17759/jmfp.2021100209
ISSN: 2304-4977 (online)

Current view on the dyadic synchrony mechanism

550

D.S. Vakhrushev, M.A. Zhukova

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article contains a review of modern foreign concepts and empirical studies of dyadic synchrony mechanism which manifests in temporal alignment of biological rhythms and behavior of individuals participating in a paired interaction. Due to the development of neuroimaging techniques, the interest in hyperscanning has increased, as it allows to register brain activity of two or more individuals capturing the mechanism of dyadic synchrony. In this article such manifestations of dyadic synchrony as changes in the electrical brain activity, cardiac rhythms, respiratory rate, hormonal levels, and behavior are described. Dyadic synchrony at the early stages of development underlies individuals’ ability to learn, feel empathy, develop attachment and build close relationships.

General Information

Keywords: dyadic synchrony, hyperscanning, EEG, psychophysiology, developmental psychology

Journal rubric: Neurosciences and Cognitive Studies

Article type: review article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100209

Funding. The reported study was funded by the grant No 19-78-10102 from the Russian Science Foundation (RSF).

For citation: Vakhrushev D.S., Zhukova M.A. Current view on the dyadic synchrony mechanism [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2021. Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 86–95. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2021100209. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bandura A. Teoriya sotsial'nogo naucheniya [Social Learning Theory]. Saint Petersburg: Evraziya, 2000. 320 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Leeuwen P.V. et al. Aerobic Exercise during Pregnancy and Presence of Fetal-Maternal Heart Rate Synchronization. PLoS ONE, 2014. Vol. 9, no. 8, article ID e106036, 9 p. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0106036
  3. Khandoker A.H. et al. Alterations in Maternal–Fetal Heart Rate Coupling Strength and Directions in Abnormal Fetuses. Frontiers in physiology, Vol. 10, article ID 482, 12 p. DOI:10.3389/fphys.2019.00482
  4. Dikker S. et al. Brain-to-Brain Synchrony Tracks Real-World Dynamic Group Interactions in the Classroom. Current Biology, 2017. Vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1375–1380. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.002
  5. Suga A. et al. Cardiac interaction between mother and infant: enhancement of heart rate variability. Scientific Reports, 2019. Vol. 9, no. 1, article ID 20019, 9 p. DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-56204-5
  6. Levy J. et al. Chronic trauma impairs the neural basis of empathy in mothers: Relations to parenting and children’s empathic abilities. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2019. Vol. 38, article ID 100658, 11 p. DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100658
  7. Cook E.C. Affective and physiological synchrony in friendships during late adolescence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2020. Vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1296–1316. DOI:10.1177/0265407519895106
  8. Braadbaart L. et al. Do mirror neuron areas mediate mu rhythm suppression during imitation and action observation? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2013. Vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 99–105. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.019
  9. Liao Y. et al. EEG imaging of toddlers during dyadic turn-taking: Mu-rhythm modulation while producing or observing social actions. NeuroImage, 2015. Vol. 112, pp. 52–60. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.055
  10. Webb K.A. et al. Effects of acute and chronic maternal exercise on fetal heart rate. Journal of applied physiology, 1994. Vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 2207–2213. DOI:10.1152/jappl.1994.77.5.2207
  11. Feldman R. Parent–infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2007. Vol. 48, no. 3–4, pp. 329–354. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01701.x
  12. Czeszumski A. et al. Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2020. Vol. 14, article ID 39, 17 p. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039
  13. Montague P. et al. Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during Linked Social Interactions. NeuroImage, 2002. Vol. 16, pp. 1159–1164. DOI:10.1006/nimg.2002.1150
  14. Barraza P. et al. Implementing EEG hyperscanning setups. MethodsX, 2019. Vol. 6, pp. 428–436. DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2019.02.021
  15. Leeuwen P.V. et al. Influence of paced maternal breathing on fetal-maternal heart rate coordination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009. Vol. 106, no. 33, pp. 13661–13666. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0901049106
  16. Delaherche E. et al. Interpersonal Synchrony: A Survey of Evaluation Methods across Disciplines. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2012. Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 349–365. DOI:10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.12
  17. Feldman R. et al. Maternal and paternal plasma, salivary, and urinary oxytocin and parent-infant synchrony: considering stress and affiliation components of human bonding. Developmental science, 2011. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 752–761. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01021.x
  18. Paulick J. et al. Nonverbal Synchrony: A New Approach to Better Understand Psychotherapeutic Processes and Drop-Out. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 2017. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 367–384. DOI:10.1037/int0000099
  19. Rüther N.N. et al. Observed manipulation of novel tools leads to mu rhythm suppression over sensory-motor cortices. Behavioural Brain Research, 2014. Vol. 261, pp. 328–335. DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.033
  20. Apter-Levi Y. et al. Oxytocin and vasopressin support distinct configurations of social synchrony. Brain Research, 2014. Vol. 1580, pp. 124–132. DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.10.052
  21. Azhari A. et al. Parenting Stress Undermines Mother-Child Brain-to-Brain Synchrony: A Hyperscanning Study. Scientific Reports, 2019. Vol. 9, article ID 11407, 9 p. DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-47810-4
  22. Hankins G.D. et al. Prolonged fetal bradycardia secondary to maternal hypothermia in response to urosepsis. American journal of perinatology, 1997. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 217–219. DOI:10.1055/s-2007-994130
  23. Leong V. et al. Speaker gaze increases information coupling between infant and adult brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017. Vol. 114, no. 50, pp. 13290–13295. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1702493114
  24. Bizzego A. et al. Strangers, Friends, and Lovers Show Different Physiological Synchrony in Different Emotional States. Behavioral Sciences, 2020. Vol. 10, no. 1, article ID 11, 13 p. DOI:10.3390/bs10010011
  25. Koole S.L. et al. Synchrony in Psychotherapy: A Review and an Integrative Framework for the Therapeutic Alliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016. Vol. 7, article ID 862, 17 p. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00862
  26. Nguyen T. et al. The effects of interaction quality on neural synchrony during mother-child problem solving. Cortex, 2020. Vol. 124, pp. 235–249. DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.020
  27. Bekedam D.J. et al. The effects of maternal hyperoxiaon fetal breathing movements, body movements and heart rate variation in growth retarded fetuses. Early Human Development, 1991. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 223–232. DOI:10.1016/0378-3782(91)90196-A
  28. Levy J. et al. The integration of social and neural synchrony: a case for ecologically valid research using MEG neuroimaging. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2021. Vol. 16, no. 1–2, pp. 143–152. DOI:10.1093/scan/nsaa061
  29. Rizzolatti G. et al. The mirror mechanism: a basic principle of brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2016. Vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 757–765. DOI:10.1038/nrn.2016.135
  30. Konvalinka I. et al. The two-brain approach: how can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2012. Vol. 6, article ID 215, 10 p. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00215
  31. Lecchi T. et al. Using dual-EEG to explore therapist client interpersonal neural synchrony. Frontiers in physiology, 2019. In print. 15 p. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/ebkpv
  32. Lecle`re C. et al. Why Synchrony Matters during Mother-Child Interactions: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE, 2014. Vol. 9, no. 12, 34 p. DOI:10.1371/ journal.pone.0113571

Information About the Authors

Daniil S. Vakhrushev, Engineer, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-2207, e-mail: danvahrushev@gmail.com

Marina A. Zhukova, PhD in Psychology, Postdoctoral Fellow, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3069-570X, e-mail: marina.zhukova@childrens.harvard.edu

Metrics

Views

Total: 847
Previous month: 36
Current month: 19

Downloads

Total: 550
Previous month: 7
Current month: 8