Development of the “Construction of Aging Strategies” Questionnaire

41

Abstract

The work describes the development and psychometric evaluation of a tool aimed at assessing the strategies used to promote successful aging. In the context of increasing life expectancy and the number of older people in the general population, the issue of maintaining and improving the quality of life of older people is particularly acute. Science has accumulated a large amount of data on the mechanisms and factors influencing aging. Moreover, these factors can be modeled by the person himself. However, there are no tools that would allow us to assess these mechanisms and the frequency of their use in a one’s life, both current and retrospectively. The study participants included 170 adults aged 40–75 years. Based on theoretical analysis, 22 strategies were formulated, each of which was assessed on a 5-point scale. To check the convergent validity, the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile questionnaire, the K.Riff Psychological Well-Being Scale, the Aging Perception Questionnaire, and questions from a demographic survey were used. As a result of exploratory factor analysis, four scales were identified: “Strategies for maintaining health”, “Metacognitive strategies”, “Strategies for self-development” and “Generative strategies”. Scale reliability and confirmatory analysis confirmed the suitability of the resulting instrument as well as its consistency with the empirical data. Analysis of convergent validity showed that the selected scales were associated with indicators of a healthy lifestyle, psychological well-being, positive ideas about aging and the desire to change something in one’s life for the sake of a prosperous old age. The results obtained can be used both for scientific study of the mechanisms of futurization of aging, and for practical work on assessing resources for the formation of aging and building individual aging trajectories.

General Information

Keywords: construction of aging strategies, futurization of aging, aging, effective aging, validization, healthy aging

Journal rubric: Empirical and Experimental Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2024.110

Funding. The study was supported by the Russian Scientific Foundation, grant no. 22-28-00869; https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-28-00869.

Received: 09.09.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Strizhitskaya O.Y., Petrash M.D. Development of the “Construction of Aging Strategies” Questionnaire. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2024. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 158–173. DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2024.110. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

Chopik, W. J., Giasson, H. L. (2017). Age differences in explicit and implicit age attitudes across the life span. The Gerontologist, 57, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx058

Harris, K., English, T., Harms, P. D., Gross, J. J., Jackson, J. J. (2017). Why are extraverts more satisfied? Personality, social experiences, and subjective well-being in college. European Journal of Personality, 31 (2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2101

Häsler, R., Venkatesh, G., Tan, Q., Flachsbart, F., Sinha, A., Rosenstiel, P., Lieb, W., Schreiber, S., Christensen, K., Christiansen, L., Nebel, A. (2017) Genetic interplay between human longevity and metabolic pathways — a large-scale eQTL study. Aging Cell, 16 (4), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12598

Iversen, T. N., Larsen L., Solem, P. E. (2009). A conceptual analysis of ageism. Nord Psychology, 61 (3), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.61.3.4

Kawamoto, T., Shimotsukasa, T., Oshio, A. (2020). Cross-sectional age differences in the Dark Triad traits in two Japanese samples. Psychology & Aging, 35 (1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000399

Kirkwood, T. B. L. (2017). Why and how are we living longer? Experimental Physiology, 102 (9), 1067–1074. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP086205

Kornadt, A. E., Rothermund, K. (2012). Internalization of age stereotypes into the self-concept via future self-views: A general model and domain-specific differences. Psychology & Aging, 27 (1), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025110

Krupina, K. M. (2023). Lifestyle and attitudes to loneliness in the context of perceptions of aging among adults:  Master Thesis. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University. (In Russian)

Lachman, M. E., Agrigoroaei, S. (2010). Promoting functional health in midlife and old age: Long-Term protective effects of control beliefs, social support, and physical exercise. PLOS ONE, 5 (10), e13297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013297

Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., Pietrzak, R. H., Ferrucci, L. (2020). When culture influences genes: Positive age beliefs amplify the cognitive-aging benefit of APOE ε2. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 75 (8), e198–e203. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa126

Marques, S., Mariano, J., Mendonça, J., De Tavernier, W., Hess, M., Naegele, L., Peixeiro, F., Martins, D. (2020). Determinants of ageism against older adults: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (7), 2560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072560

Melehin, A. I., Sergienko, E. A. (2019). Specificity of cognitive bias in recognition of emotions in the face in old age. Klinicheskaia i spetsial’naia psikhologiia = Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 8 (2), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2019080204 (In Russian, аbstract in English)

Murabito, J. M., Yuan, R., Lunetta, K. L. (2021). The search for longevity and healthy aging genes: Insights from epidemiological studies and samples of long‐lived individuals. The Journals of Gerontology Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 67 (5), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gls089

Nelson, M. E., Jester, D. J., Petkus, A. J., Andel, R. (2021). Cognitive reserve, Alzheimer’s neuropathology, and risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 31 (2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09478-4

Olshansky, S. J., Perry, D., Miller, R. A., Butler, R. N. (2007). Pursuing the longevity dividend. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1114, 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1396.050

Ostan, R., Monti, D., Gueresi, P., Bussolotto, M., Franceschi, C., Baggio, G. (2016). Gender, aging and longevity in humans: an update of an intriguing/neglected scenario paving the way to a gender-specific medicine. Clinical Science (London), 130 (19), 1711–1725. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20160004

Petrash, M. D., Strizhitskaya, O. Yu., Murtazina, I. R. (2018). Validation of the questionnaire “Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile” in the Russian sample. Konsul’tativnaia psikhologiia i psikhoterapiia = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 26 (3), 164–190. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2018260309 (In Russian, аbstract in English)

Potter, S., Drewelies, J., Wagner, J., Duezel, S., Brose, A., Demuth, I., Steinhagen-Thiessen, E., Lindenberger, U., Wagner, G. G., Gerstorf, D. (2020). Trajectories of multiple subjective well-being facets across old age: The role of health and personality. Psychology & Aging, 35 (6), 894–909. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000459

Rowe, J. W., Kahn, R. L. (2015). Successful Aging 2.0: Conceptual expansions for the 21st century. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 70 (4), 593–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv025

Ruggiero, C., Metter, E. J., Melenovsky, V., Cherubini, A., Najjar, S. S., Ble, A., Senin, U., Longo, D. L., Ferrucci, L. (2008). High basal metabolic rate is a risk factor for mortality: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 63 (7), 698–706. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/63.7.698

Stevens, M., Cruwys, T. (2020). Membership in sport or exercise groups predicts sustained physical activity and longevity in older adults compared to physically active matched controls. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 54 (8), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa003

Strizhitskaya, O. Yu., Petrash, M. D. (2022). Construction of productive ageing: Biological, psychological and environmental factors. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 30 (1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2022300102 (In Russian, аbstract in English)

Strizhitskaya, O., Petrash, M., Golubitskaya, D., Kuzmina, M., Krupina, K., Shchukin, A., Engelgardt, E. (2022). Futurization of aging: Subjective beliefs and effects. Behavioral Sciences, 13 (1), 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13010004

Zarulli, V., Barthold Jones, J. A., Oksuzyan, A., Lindahl-Jacobsen, R., Christensen, K., Vaupel, J. W. (2018). Women live longer than men even during severe famines and epidemics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115 (4), E832–E840. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701535115

Zhukovskaya, L. V., Troshikhina, E. G. (2011). K. Ryff ’s scale of Psychological Well-being. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal,  32 (2), 82–93. (In Russian, аbstract in English)

Information About the Authors

Olga Y. Strizhitskaya, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of the Department of Developmental Psychology and Differential Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7141-162X, e-mail: o.strizhitskaya@spbu.ru

Marina D. Petrash, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Developmental and Differential Psychology, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4542-7289, e-mail: m.petrash@spbu.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 78
Previous month: 13
Current month: 14

Downloads

Total: 41
Previous month: 9
Current month: 8