Аdapting to a New Reality: A Review of International Studies on the Developmental Specificities of Children Deprived of Parental Care in Substitute Families and Through Adoption

4

Abstract

This article analyzes the challenges encountered during the adoption of children or their placement in substitute families across various countries, with a focus on their adaptation, psychosocial development, cognitive abilities, and social integration. To achieve the objectives of this research, the scope was not limited to adopted children but extended to children deprived of parental care who were placed in alternative forms of family care (substitute families—such as guardianship families, including foster families). Foreign researchers differentiate between foster children: “substitute family” — raised in a foster or substitute family, “adopted children” — adopted, “looked after children” — under guardianship, “foster families” — temporary stay in families, (an analogue is the system of state care in Russia), who are waiting for a suitable family for upbringing and long-term residence. The possibility of studying this category of children is associated with the practice of open adoption prevalent in most countries. In contrast, the secrecy of adoption in Russia impedes the ability to track the developmental dynamics of children, particularly those adopted at an early age. The study examines key factors influencing the well-being of adopted children and children under kinship guardianship, including the impact of cultural differences, models of adoption (open and closed), early traumatic experiences, and the level of support provided to foster families. Special attention is paid to medical aspects, academic performance, psychological issues, and potential behavioral deviations. An analysis of international data identifies the primary challenges faced by adopted children, such as legal troubles, emotional instability, and difficulties in social integration. It is revealed that the source of psychological trauma in most cases lies in the pre-adoption period of the child's life, which often includes factors collectively referred to as adverse childhood experiences. Parental attention and warmth in relationships can significantly mitigate the challenges faced by children. The article underscores the importance of an interdisciplinary approach, including collaboration between government institutions, NGOs, and educational organizations, to minimize the negative effects of adverse childhood experiences and improve the quality of life for children.

General Information

Keywords: adoption, adopted children, psychosocial adaptation, cognitive development, cultural differences, adoption models, traumatic experiences, legal aspects of adoption, child well-being

Journal rubric: Age-Related Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/ssc.2024050404

Funding. The study was carried out to fulfill state assignment No. 073-00037-24-01 by the Ministry of Educa-tion of the Russian Federation dated February 9, 2024 (Scientific and Methodological Support for the Design of Motivational Measures for Development of Family Placement Forms for Orphans and Children Without Parental Care, Based on the Priority Child Placement Form and Study of the Will-ingness of Prospective Adoptive Parents to Admit Children of the Hard-to-Place Category into the Family (Applied Research)”.

Received: 04.12.2024

Accepted:

For citation: Semya G.V., Telitsyna A.Yu., Lashkul M.V. Аdapting to a New Reality: A Review of International Studies on the Developmental Specificities of Children Deprived of Parental Care in Substitute Families and Through Adoption [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’nye nauki i detstvo = Social Sciences and Childhood, 2024. Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 65–85. DOI: 10.17759/ssc.2024050404. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Afanas'evskaya A.V., Akhmetova D.I. Institut usynovleniya v Rossii i za rubezhom: istoriko-pravovoi analiz [Institute of Adoption in Russia and abroad: historical and legal analysis]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Series: Law], 2022. Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 26–31. DOI:10.47475/2618-8236-2022-17405 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  2. Telitsyna A.Yu. Sotsial'naya adaptatsiya detei-sirot i detei, ostavshikhsya bez popecheniya roditelei, v zameshchayushchikh sem'yakh [Social Adaptation of Orphans and Children left without Parental Care in Substitute Families] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’nye nauki i detstvo = Social Sciences and Childhood, 2021. Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 84–95. DOI:10.17759/ssc.2021020207 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  3. Ahrens K., Garrison M., Courtney M. Rates of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Other Chronic Health Outcomes Among Young Adults Formerly in Foster Care in Comparison to Economically Insecure and Secure General Population Young Adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2014. Vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 14–15. DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.044
  4. Alfano C.A., Valentine M., Nogales J.M., Kim J., Kim J.S., Rigos P., McGlinchey E.L., Ripple C.H., Wolfson A.R. How Are the Sleep Problems of Children in the US Foster Care System Addressed? Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics: JDBP, 2022. Vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 525–532. DOI:10.1097/DBP.0000000000001090
  5. Anthony R.E., Paine A.L., Shelton K.H. Adverse Childhood Experiences of Children Adopted from Care: The Importance of Adoptive Parental Warmth for Future Child Adjustment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019. Vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2212. DOI:10.3390/ijerph16122212
  6. Anthony R., Paine A.L., Westlake M., Lowthian E., Shelton K.H. Patterns of adversity and post-traumatic stress among children adopted from care. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2022, no. 130(Pt 2), pp. 104–795. DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104795
  7. Beijersbergen M.D., Juffer F., Bakermans-Kranenburg M.J., van Ijzendoorn M.H. Remaining or becoming secure: Parental sensitive support predicts attachment continuity from infancy to adolescence in a longitudinal adoption study. Developmental Psychology, 2012. Vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1277–1282. DOI:10.1037/a0027442
  8. Berger L.M., Bruch S.K., Johnson E.I., James S., Rubin D. Estimating the “impact” of out-of-home placement on child well-being: approaching the problem of selection bias. Child Development, 2009. Vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1856–1876. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01372.x
  9. Bramlett M.D., Radel L.F., Blumberg S.J. The health and well-being of adopted children. Pediatrics, 2007. Vol. 119. Suppl 1, pp. 54–60. DOI:10.1542/peds.2006-2089I
  10. Brown A., Waters C.S., Shelton K.H. A systematic review of the school performance and behavioural and emotional adjustments of children adopted from care. Adoption and Fostering, 2017. Vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 346–368. DOI:10.1177/0308575917731064
  11. Bruskas D. Children in foster care: a vulnerable population at risk. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing: Official Publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, 2008. Vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 70–77. DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6171.2008.00134.x
  12. Cifre A.B., Budnick C.J., Bick J., McGlinchey E.L., Ripple C.H., Wolfson A.R., Alfano C.A. Sleep Health among Children Adopted from Foster Care: The Moderating Effect of Parent–Child Sleep Interactions. Behavioral Sleep Medicine, 2024. Vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 472–487. DOI:10.1080/15402002.2024.2303467
  13. Dangadze B., Verulava T., Jorbenadze R., Bedianashvili G. Challenges Faced by Youth Aging out of Foster Care: Homelessness, Education, and Employment. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 2021. Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–10. DOI:10.51709/19951272/spring2021/15-1
  14. Dhludhlu S.L. Сhallenges and barriers experienced by youths leaving the foster care system in Tshwane district municipality, Gauteng province. Social Work. Maatskaplike Werk, 2024. Vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 554–574. DOI:10.15270/60-3-1347
  15. Doyle Jr.J.J. Child protection and adult crime: Using investigator assignment to estimate causal effects of foster care. Journal of Political Economy, 2008. Vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 746–770. DOI:10.1086/590216
  16. Dunnigan A.E., Thompson T., Jonson-Reid M., Drake F.B. Chronic Health Conditions and Children in Foster Care: Determining Demographic and Placement-Related Correlates. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 2017. Vol. 11, no. 4-5, pp. 586–598. DOI:10.1080/15548732.2017.1339655
  17. Eisenberg N., Valiente C., Spinrad T.L., Cumberland A., Liew J., Reiser M., Zhou Q., Losoya S.H. Longitudinal relations of children’s effortful control, impulsivity, and negative emotionality to their externalizing, internalizing, and co-occurring behavior problems. Developmental Psychology, 2009. Vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 988–1008. DOI:10.1037/a0016213
  18. Engh L., Janson S., Svensson B., Bornehag C.G., Eriksson U.B. Swedish population-based study of pupils showed that foster children faced increased risks for ill health, negative lifestyles and school failure. Acta Paediatrica, 2017. Vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 1635–1641. DOI:10.1111/apa.13966
  19. Engler A.D., Sarpong K.O., Van Horne B.S., Greeley C.S., Keefe R.J. A Systematic Review of Mental Health Disorders of Children in Foster Care. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 2022. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 255–264. DOI:10.1177/1524838020941197
  20. Escobar M.J., Pereira X., Santelices M.P. Behavior problems and attachment in adopted and non-adopted adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 2014. Vol. 42, pp. 59–66. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.001
  21. Frimpong-Manso K., Bukuluki P., Addy T.N.A., Obeng J.K., Kato F. Pregnancy and parenting experiences of care-experienced youth in Ghana and Uganda. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 2022. Vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 683–692. DOI:10.1007/s10560-022-00829-5
  22. Fusco R.A. Sleep in young adults: Comparing foster care alumni to a low-income sample. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2019. Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 493–501. DOI:10.1007/s10826-019-01555-w
  23. Harty J.S., Ethier K.L. Fatherhood in foster care: A scoping review spanning 30 years of research on expectant and parenting fathers in state care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 2022. Vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 693–710. DOI:10.1007/s10560-022-00848-2
  24. Harwick R.M., Unruh D., Lindstrom L. Transition to adulthood for youth with disabilities who experienced foster care: An ecological approach. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2020, no. 99, pp. 104–310. DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104310
  25. Hornfeck F., Bovenschen I., Heene S., Zimmermann J., Zwönitzer A., Kindler H. Emotional and behavior problems in adopted children – The role of early adversities and adoptive parents' regulation and behavior. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2019, no. 98, pp. 104–221. DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104221
  26. Johnson-Reid M., Barth R.P. From placement to prison: The path to adolescent incarceration from child welfare supervised foster or group care. Children and Youth Services Review, 2000. Vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 493–516. DOI:10.1016/S0190-7409(00)00100-6
  27. Keefe R.J., Cummings A.D.L., Smith A.E., Greeley C.S., Van Horne B.S. Psychotropic Medication Prescribing: Youth in Foster Care Compared with Other Medicaid Enrollees. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 2023. Vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 149–155. DOI:10.1089/cap.2022.0092
  28. Keyes M.A., Malone S.M., Sharma A., Iacono W.G., McGue M. Risk of suicide attempt in adopted and nonadopted offspring. Pediatrics, 2013. Vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 639–646. DOI:10.1542/peds.2012-3251
  29. Loderer M., Gresser U. Influence of Interrupted Childhood Biographies on Health Development: Evaluation of the Scientific Literature on the Example of Being Taken into Care. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 2024. Vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 108–119. DOI:10.4236/jbm.2024.127010
  30. Martínez I., Murgui S., Garcia O.F., Garcia F. Parenting in the digital era: Protective and risk parenting styles for traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019. Vol. 90, pp. 84–92. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.036
  31. Masten A.S. Global perspectives on resilience in children and youth. Child Development, 2014. Vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 6–20. DOI:10.1111/cdev.12205
  32. Masten A.S. Resilience in children threatened by extreme adversity: Frameworks for research, practice, and translational synergy. Development and Psychopathology, 2011. Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 493–506. DOI:10.1017/S0954579411000198
  33. McSherry D., McAnee G. Exploring the relationship between adoption and psychological trauma for children who are adopted from care: A longitudinal case study perspective. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2022, no. 130(Pt 2), pp. 105–623. DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105623
  34. Mihalec-Adkins B.P., Cooley M. Examining individual–level academic risk and protective factors for foster youth: School engagement, behaviors, self–esteem, and social skills. Child & Family Social Work, 2019. Vol. 25, no. 2. DOI:10.1111/cfs.12681
  35. Mmusi F.I., van Breda A. Male care-leavers' transfer of social skills from care into independent living in South Africa. Children and Youth Services Review, 2017. Vol. 81, pp. 350–357. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.024
  36. Moyer A.M., Goldberg A.E. Foster Youth’s Educational Challenges and Supports: Perspectives of Teachers, Foster Parents, and Former Foster Youth. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 2020. Vol. 37, pp. 123–136. DOI:10.1007/s10560-019-00640-9
  37. Oh D.L., Jerman P., Silvério Marques S., et al. Systematic review of pediatric health outcomes associated with childhood adversity. BMC Pediatrics, 2018. Vol. 18, no. 21. Article 83. DOI:10.1186/s12887-018-1037-7
  38. Okpych N.J., Courtney M.E. Barriers to Degree Completion for College Students with Foster Care Histories: Results From a 10-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 2021. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 28–54. DOI:10.1177/1521025118791776
  39. Palacios J., Adroher S., Brodzinsky D., Grotevant H., Johnson D. Adoption in the service of child welfare: Sociocultural and organizational perspectives. Psychosocial Intervention, 2019. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 133–144. DOI:10.5093/pi2019a19
  40. Pears K.C., Fisher P.A., Bruce J., Kim H.K., Yoerger K. Early elementary school adjustment of maltreated children in foster care: The roles of inhibitory control and caregiver involvement. Child Development, 2010. Vol. 81, pp. 1550–1564. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01491.x
  41. Pinquart M. Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with internalizing symptoms in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Marriage & Family Review, 2017. Vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 613–640. DOI:10.1080/01494929.2016.1247761
  42. Selman P. The rise and fall of intercountry adoption in the 21st century. International Social Work, 2009. Vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 575–594. DOI:10.1177/0020872809337681
  43. Simmel C., Barth R.P., Brooks D. Adopted foster youths’ psychosocial functioning: A longitudinal perspective. Child and Family Social Work, 2007. Vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 336–348. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00481.x
  44. Simmons-Horton S.Y. «A Bad Combination»: Lived Experiences of Youth Involved in the Foster Care and Juvenile Justice Systems. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 2021. Vol. 38, pp. 583–597. DOI:10.1007/s10560-020-00693-1
  45. Somers C.L., Goutman R.L., Day A., Enright O., Crosby S., Taussig H. Academic Achievement Among a Sample of Youth in Foster Care: The Role of School Connectedness. Psychology in the Schools, 2020. Vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1845–1863. DOI:10.1002/pits.22433
  46. Whetten K., Ostermann J., Whetten R.A., O’Donnell K., Thielman N. More than the loss of a parent: potentially traumatic events among orphaned and abandoned children. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2011. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 174–182. DOI:10.1002/jts.20625
  47. Zlotnick C., Tam T.W., Soman L.A. Life course outcomes on mental and physical health: the impact of foster care on adulthood. American Journal of Public Health, 2012. Vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 534–540. DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300285
  48. Zvara B.J., Sheppard K.W., Cox M. Bidirectional effects between parenting sensitivity and child behavior: A cross-lagged analysis across middle childhood and adolescence. Journal of Family Psychology, 2018. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 484–495. DOI:10.1037/fam0000372

Information About the Authors

Galina V. Semya, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor of the Department of Developmental Psychology named after Professor L.F. Obukhova" Faculty of Educational Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Professor of the Department of Psychological Anthropology of the Institute of Childhood of the Moscow Pedagogical State University., Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9583-8698, e-mail: gvsemia@yandex.ru

Aleksandra Y. Telitsyna, PhD in Biology, Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Studies of Civil Society and Nonprofit Sector, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Man-agement in NGOs National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0186-3989, e-mail: atelitsyna@hse.ru

Marina V. Lashkul, Deputy Director, Center for the Protection of the Rights and Interests of Children, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6907-1881, e-mail: ml-69@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 12
Previous month: 0
Current month: 12

Downloads

Total: 4
Previous month: 0
Current month: 4