Attachment to Pets and Love for People – is There a Connection?

Objective. The study is aimed at investigating the relationship between attachment to pets and pro-social personality characteristics – environmental identity, moral motives, and ecological lifestyle.
Background. Attachment to pets is being investigated in the context animal-assisted therapy animal rights protection but the question of the possible contribution of this phenomenon to the development of humane treatment of people is still open. Is it possible to expect that attachment to a pet has a humanizing effect or does retain its specificity without being related to the pet owners’ pro-social attitudes – this research question reflects the main problem of the study.
Study design. The study has correlational design; data was collected online using the 1ka.si service.
Participants. The study sample consisted of 284 respondents (224 women, 60 men, aged 18-76, M_age = 25,4, SD_age = 9,7, mostly owners of cats and dogs, mostly Russian citizens).
Measurements. Validated Russian versions of the questionnaires were used, i.e., the Lexington attachment to pets scale (modified 8-item version prepared in this study), the 30-item Moral motives scale, the 14-item Environmental identity scale, and the 7-item Ecological lifestyle scale.
Results. It has been found that different aspects of attachment to a pet are indeed associated with environmental identity, moral motives (with the exception of self-restraint), and social eco-activism. It is also shown that two aspects of attachment to pets (pet rights and the experience of happiness from communicating with a pet) in different combinations predict the motives of not-harming, helping, social justice, and social eco-activism.
Conclusions. Attachment to pets is positively related to the pro-social attitudes of the pet owners, mostly those reflected an active pet owners’ position, but is not connected with the self-restraint qualities.

1. Gesse G. Stepnoi volk. Igra v biser. Rasskazy i ocherki [Steppenwolf. Bead Game. Stories and essays]. Moscow: ACT, 2004. 749 p. (In Russ.).
2. Deryabo S.D. Fenomen sub”ektifikatsii prirodnykh ob”ektov. Diss. dokt. psikhol. nauk. [The phenomenon of subjectification of natural objects. Dr. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 2002. 365 p. (In Russ.).
3. Shveitser A. Propovedi o blagogovenii pered zhizn’yu (Fevral’ 1919) [Sermons on reverence for life (February 1919)]. Eticheskaya mysl’ = Ethical Thought, 2022. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 89—99. (In Russ.).
4. Ahmad M.H., Teo S.P. Hoarding behaviour in a person with dementia // Aging Commun. 2022. Vol. 4. № 4. P. 21. DOI:10.53388/AGING202204021
5. Beverland M.B., Farrelly F., Lim E.A.C. Exploring the dark side of pet ownership: Status-and control-based pet consumption // Journal of Business Research. 2008. Vol. 61. № 5. P. 490—496. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.08.009
6. Bosacki S., Tardif-Williams C.Y., Roma R.P.S. Children’s and Adolescents’ Pet Attachment, Empathy, and Compassionate Responding to Self and Others // Adolescents. 2022. Vol. 2. № 4. P. 493—507. DOI:10.3390/adolescents2040039
7. Clayton S. et al. Cross-cultural validation of a revised environmental identity scale // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13. № 4. P. 2387. DOI:10.3390/su13042387
8. Culiberg B., Cho H., Kos Koklic M., Zabkar V. From car use reduction to ride-sharing: The relevance of moral and environmental identity // Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 2022. DOI:10.1002/cb.2080
9. Diebels K.J., Leary M.R. The psychological implications of believing that everything is one // The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2019. Vol. 14. № 4. P. 463—473. DOI:10.1080/17439760.2018.1484939
10. Fine A.H. Handbook on animal-assisted therapy: Foundations and guidelines for animalassisted interventions. Academic press, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/C2017-0-03315-3
11. Freeman C.P. The human animal earthling identity: Shared values unifying human rights, animal rights, and environmental movements. University of Georgia Press, 2020.
12. Hawkins R.D., Robinson C., Brodie Z.P. Child—Dog Attachment, Emotion Regulation andPsychopathology: The Mediating Role  of Positive and Negative Behaviours // Behavioral Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12. № 4. P. 109. DOI:10.3390/bs12040109
13. Hawkins R.D., Williams J.M. Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Scottish SPCA). Childhood attachment to pets: Associations between pet attachment, attitudes to animals, compassion, and humane behaviour // International journal  of environmental research and public health. 2017. Vol. 14. № 5. P. 490. DOI:10.3390/ijerph14050490
14. Janoff-Bulman R., Carnes N.C. Surveying the moral landscape: Moral motives and groupbased moralities // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2013. Vol. 17. № 3. P. 219—236. DOI:10.1177/1088868313480274
15. Johnson T.P., Garrity T.F., Stallones L. Psychometric evaluation of the Lexington attachment to pets scale (LAPS) // Anthrozoös. 1992. Vol. 5. № 3. P. 160—175. DOI:10.2752/089279392787011395
16. Kanat-Maymon Y., Wolfson S., Cohen R., Roth G. The benefits of giving as well as receiving need support in human—pet relations // Journal of Happiness Studies. 2021. Vol. 22. P. 1441—1457.
17. Kellert S.R., Wilson E.O. (ed.). The biophilia hypothesis. Island press, 1995. 496 p.
18. Kovács K. et al. Dog-owner attachment is associated with oxytocin receptor gene polymorphisms in both parties. A comparative study on Austrian and Hungarian border collies // Frontiers in Psychology. 2018. P. 435. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00435
19. le Roux M.C., Wright S. The relationship between pet attachment, life satisfaction, and perceived stress: Results from a South African online survey // Anthrozoös. 2020. Vol. 33. № 3. P. 371—385. DOI:10.1080/08927936.2020.1746525
20. Leary M.R., Tipsord J.M., Tate E.B. Allo-inclusive identity: Incorporating the social and natural worlds into one’s sense of self // Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego. 2008. P. 137—147. DOI:10.1037/11771-013
21. Naess A. Ecology, community and lifestyle, trans. David Rothenberg // CUP, Cambridge. 1989.
22. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Kuznetsova V.B. Friendly home and inhabitants’ morality: mutual relationships // Frontiers in psychology. 2018. Vol. 8. P. 2348. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02348
23. Nartova-Bochaver S., Muhortova E. If people are attached to plants, do they love other people? Case of the Russian youth // Behavioral Sciences. 2020. Vol. 10. № 2. P. 40. DOI:10.3390/bs10020040
24. Neldner K. et al. The developmental origins of moral concern: An examination of moral boundary decision making throughout childhood // PLoS One. 2018. Vol. 13. № 5. P. e0197819. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0197819
25. Patronek G. Animal hoarding: a third dimension of animal abuse // International Handbook of Theory and Research on Animal Abuse and Cruelty. 2008. P. 221—246.
26. Ramírez M.T.G., Quezada Berumen L.C., Hernández R.L. Psychometric properties of the lexington attachment to pets scale: Mexican version (LAPS-M) // Anthrozoös. 2014. Vol. 27. № 3. P. 351—359. DOI:10.2752/175303714X13903827487926
27. Reznichenko S.I., Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Irkhin B.D. Do authentic people care about the environment? A view from two paradigms // Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2021. Vol. 14. № 3. P. 81—102.
28. Schmitt M.T., Mackay C.M., Droogendyk L.M., Payne D. What predicts environmental activism? The roles of identification with nature and politicized environmental identity // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2019. Vol. 61. P. 20—29. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.11.003
29. Schwarzmueller-Erber G., Maier M., Kundi M. Pet attachment and wellbeing of older-aged recreational horseback riders // International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020. Vol. 17. № 6. P. 1865. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17061865
30. Wild D. et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation // Value in health. 2005. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 94—104. DOI:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
31. Zaparanick T.L. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale. 2008. URL:  https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/359 (Accessed 01.02.2023).