The Development of Science as a Personal Project: Male and Female Students about the Prospects of the Development of Russian Science

Objective. The study, based on a comparative analysis, provides an answer to the question about the features of designing strategies for involvement in scientific activities among male and female students at regional universities. Background. Traditionally, science is considered a male field of activity, less accessible to women. The article presents a point of view according to which gender stereotypes are the basis of gender asymmetry in science. A special role in the transmission of gender norms at the stage of primary gender socialization is assigned to the family and school, while the fact of gender stereotyping constructed by education in the choice of profession is stated. Girls, even with academic success, reproduce outdated gender stereotypes, considering science as a sphere of “male self-realization”. Study design. The collection of data on the social perceptions and social attitudes of the students was carried out using the "Scientific Priorities" questionnaire (25 statements about science). This questionnaire was filled in by the study participants based on 8 modalities (“important to me”/high personal importance; “ready to participate”/willingness to act; “important for my faculty”; “important for my university”; “important for the Russian science”; “important for the development of science and universities in the countries of the East”; “important for the development of science and universities in the countries of the West”; “important for the development of world science as a whole”). Next, a comparative analysis of 2 groups (male and female students) was used with interpretation in line with gender methodology. Participants. Sample: 387 students (321 female students and 66 male students) specializing in medicine, psychology and pedagogy from the universities of Kirov, Kursk and Nizhny Novgorod. Measurements. The survey questionnaire “Scientific priorities” focused on the objectives of the study was used. The statements in the questionnaire are combined into four blocks: traditional ideas about the development of science; current trends; block of socio-economic deprivation; sensitivity to political change. Results. At regional universities, male students studying at the faculties of “helping professions”, defining the priorities of scientific development, formulate them in accordance with the values and priorities of “male culture”: a technological bias, a high role of competition and an orientation towards a high status of a scientist in society. At regional universities, female students studying at the faculties of “helping professions” demonstrate an interest in the development of science, but do not consider science as a “personal project”. In addition, when studying the social ideas and attitudes of students in the field of science development, the phenomenon of a positive assessment of a remote object was revealed. Among the male and female students surveyed, the social perceptions of Russian science turned out to be the most consimilar. Conclusions. It is concluded that gender stereotypes reproduced at the level of students' self-concept are oriented towards supporting the usual format of “masculinization of science”. However, to restore the positions of female students in the field of scientific work, it is not enough just to change gender stereotypes and social perceptions. To support women researchers, social programs are needed to help girls combine professional life in science and motherhood.

1. Andreeva G.M., Bogomolova N.N., Petrovskaya L.A. Zarubezhnaya sotsial'naya psikhologiya XX stoletiya [Foreign social psychology of the XX century]. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2002. 288 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bazhin K.S., Shkurikhina V.M. Aktual'nost' studencheskoy nauchnoy deyatel'nosti: rezul'taty anketirovaniya [The relevance of student scientific activity: the results of a survey]. Vestnik VyatGU = Herald of Vyatka State University, 2006, no. 14, pp. 255–258. (In Russ.).
3. Bogdanova I.F. Zhenshchiny v nauke: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Women in Science: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological studies, 2004, no. 1, pp. 103– (In Russ.).
4. Brushkova A.L., Prokhorova I.G. Gendernoye ravenstvo v nauke: dostizheniya i problemy [Gender equality in science: achievements and problems]. Vestnik RGGU = RSUH/RGGU Bulletin, 2021, no. 1(2), pp. 209–217. DOI:10.28995/2073-6401-2021-1-209-217 (In Russ.).
5. Vilkova K.A., Lebedeva N.V. Dinamika akademicheskoy motivatsii v universitete: yest' li gendernyye razlichiya? [Elektronnyi resurs] [Dynamics of academic motivation at the university: are there gender differences?]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Studies, 2020. Vol. 13, no. 74, pp. 1–19. URL: http://psystudy.ru (Accessed 12.08.2022). DOI:10.54359/ps.v13i74.167 (In Russ.).
6. Gavrilova E.V., Ushakov D.V., Yurevich A.V. Translyatsiya nauchnogo opyta i lichnostnoye znaniye [Translation of scientific experience and personal knowledge]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological studies, 2015, no. 9, pp. 28– (In Russ.).
7. Gordeeva I.V. Analiz mneniy studentov ekonomicheskogo vuza o perspektivakh nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa [Analysis of the opinions of students of an economic university on the prospects for scientific and technological progress]. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii = Modern high technologies, 2020, no. 1, pp. 57–62. (In Russ.).
8. Dobrokhleb V.G. Zhenshchiny v rossiyskoy nauke kak potentsial yeye razvitiya [Women in Russian science as a potential for its development]. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve = Woman in Russian Society, 2021, no. 2, pp. 80–89. DOI:10.21064/WinRS.2021.2.6 (In Russ.).
9. Dolgova E.A., Streltsova E.A. «Dobro pozhalovat' v klub»: polozheniye zhenshchin v sovetskoy nauke 1920-kh godov ["Welcome to the club": the position of women in Soviet science in the 1920s]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological studies, 2019, no. 2, pp. 97–107. DOI:10.31857/S013216250004014-8 (In Russ.).
10. Zubkovskaya O.N., Sivukha S.V. Sotsial'nyye predstavleniya [Social representations]. Sotsiologiya: Entsiklopediya = Sociology: Encyclopedia. Minsk: Knizhnyi DOM, 2003. 1312 p. (In Russ.).
11. Gokhberg L.M. et al. Indikatory nauki 2020: statisticheskiy sbornik [Science and Technology Indicators in the Russian Federation: 2020: Data Book]. In Gokhberg L.M. (eds.) Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2020. 496 p. DOI:10.17323/978-5-7598-2184-7 (In Russ.).
12. Kletsina I.S., Ioffe E.V. Normy muzhskogo i zhenskogo povedeniya v otsenkakh studencheskoy molodezhi [Norms of male and female behavior in student youth assessments]. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie. Nauchno-informatsionnyi zhurnal = Human. Community. Management. Scientific Journal, 2016. Vol. 17(3), pp. 61–72. (In Russ.).
13. Kon I.S. Muzhchina v menyayushchemsya mire [A man in a changing world]. Moscow: Vremya, 2009. 496 p. (In Russ.).
14. Kostina A.V. Zhenshchina v nauke i filosofii: dominiruyushchiye mify i deystvitel'nost' [Woman in Science and Philosophy: Dominant Myths and Reality]. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2017, no. 1, pp. 66–78. DOI:10.17805/zpu.2017.1.3 (In Russ.).
15. Leportois D. Zhenshchiny bol'she ozabocheny ekologicheskimi voprosami, chem muzhchiny? [Elektronnyi resurs] [Are women more concerned about environmental issues than men?]. Inostrannaya pressa o Rossii i ne tol'ko = InoPressa. Press digest. URL: https://www.inopressa.ru/article/27Aug2020/slatefr/ecology.html (Accessed 12.08.2022). (In Russ.).
16. Malysheva M.M. Estestvennyye i tekhnicheskiye nauki dlya zhenshchin v XXI veke [Natural and technical sciences for women in the XXI century]. Narodonaselenie = Population, 2016, no. 3, pp. 76– (In Russ.).
17. Popova I.P. Formirovaniye kar'yernogo starta v nauke: vliyaniye sem'i i sotsial'nogo konteksta [Formation of a career start in science: the influence of family and social context]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological studies, 2021, no. 12, pp. 101–112. DOI:10.31857/S013216250017245-2 (In Russ.).
18. Pushkareva N.L. Zhenshchiny v rossiyskoy nauke kontsa XX–nachala XXI veka: obobshcheniye kolichestvennykh kharakteristik [Women in Russian science in the late XX–early XXI century: generalization of quantitative characteristics]. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve = Woman in Russian Society, 2010, no. 3(56), pp. 24–35. (In Russ.).
19. Pushkareva N.L. Zhenshchiny v sovetskoy nauke. 1917-1980-ye gg. [Women in Soviet science. 1917-1980s]. Voprosy istorii = Issues of History, 2011, no. 11, pp. 92–102. (In Russ.).
20. Radina N.K., Nikitina A.A. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya muzhestvennosti: sotsial'no-konstruktivistskiy podkhod [Social psychology of masculinity: social constructivist approach]. Moscow: Borges, 2011. 168 p. (In Russ.).
21. Razinskaya V.D., Zhiryakova E.S., Kuzminova N.V. Problemy formirovaniya obraza nauki u sovremennykh studentov [Problems of formation of the image of science among modern students]. Diskussiya = Discussion, 2013, no. 11(41), pp. 78–82. (In Russ.).
22. Rossiyskiy gendernyy poryadok: sotsiologicheskiy podkhod [Russian gender order: a sociological approach]. Zdravomyslova E. (eds.). Saint-Petersburg: EUSP Press, 2007. 306 p. (In Russ.).
23. Savinskaya O.B. Gendernoye ravenstvo v STEM-programmakh doshkol'nogo obrazovaniya kak faktor uspeshnogo tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya Rossii [Gender Equality in STEM Preschool Education Programs as a Factor of Russia's Successful Technological Development]. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve = Woman in Russian Society, 2016, no. 3(80), pp. 16–25. (In Russ.).
24. Savinskaya O.B., Lebedeva N.V. Pochemu zhenshchiny ukhodyat iz STEM: rol' stereotipov [Why women leave STEM: the role of stereotypes]. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve = Woman in Russian Society, 2020, no. 2, pp. 62–75. DOI:10.21064/WinRS.2020.2.6 (In Russ.).
25. Savinskaya O.B., Mkhitaryan T.A. Tekhnicheskiye distsipliny (STEM) kak devichiy professional'nyy vybor: dostizheniya, samootsenka i skrytyy uchebnyy plan [Technical disciplines (STEM) as a girl's professional choice: achievements, self-assessment and hidden curriculum]. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve = Woman in Russian Society, 2018, no. 3, pp. 34–48. DOI:10.21064/WinRS.2018.3.4 (In Russ.).
26. Semenova L.E., Semenova V.E. Gendernaya psikhologiya [Gender psychology]. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2021. 309 p. (In Russ.).
27. Sillaste G. Gendernaya asimmetriya kak faktor kar'yernogo rosta zhenshchin [Gender Asymmetry as a Factor of Women's Career Growth]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, 2004, no. 3, pp. 122–133. (In Russ.).
28. Sillaste G.G. Nauka kak sfera samorealizatsii zhenshchin i sotsiogendernyy potentsial yeye razvitiya [Science as a sphere of self-realization of women and the socio-gender potential of its development]. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve = Woman in Russian Society, 2021, no. 4, pp. 3–17. DOI:10.21064/WinRS.2021.4.1 (In Russ.).
29. Sobkin V.S., Smyslova M.M., Kolomiets Yu.O. Migratsionnyye ustanovki aspirantov: k voprosu ob «utechke mozgov» [Elektronnyi resurs] [Migration installations of graduate students: on the issue of “brain drain”]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological-Educational Studies, 2020. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 61–79. DOI:10.17759/psyedu.2020120304 (In Russ.).
30. Khotkina Z.A., Dobrokhleb V.G., Rusanova N.E. Gendernyye problemy v sovremennoy Rossii i metodologiya ikh analiza [Gender problems in modern Russia and methodology of their analysis]. Narodonaselenie = Population, 2018. 21, no. 4, pp. 135–149. DOI:10.26653/1561-7785-2018-21-4-12 (In Russ.).
31. Shvetsova A.V. Bar'yery professional'nogo razvitiya molodykh uchenykh v genderno-differentsirovannoy srede nauchnogo soobshchestva [Barriers to the professional development of young scientists in a gender-differentiated environment of the scientific community]. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve = Woman in Russian Society, 2021, no. 1, pp. 83–93. DOI:10.21064/WinRS.2021.1.7 (In Russ.).
32. Shevchenko I.O. Zanyatost' v nauchnoy sfere v gendernom kontekste [Employment in the scientific field in a gender context]. Vestnik RGGU = RSUH/RGGU Bulletin, 2021, no. 1(2), pp. 218–230. DOI:10.28995/2073-6401-2021-1-218-230 (In Russ.).
33. Barnett R.C., Sabattini L. A Short History of Women in Science: From Stone Walls to Invisible Walls / Women and Science. American Enterprise Institute (ed.). Washington: DC, 2010. 1–10.
34. Steinke J. Adolescent Girls’ STEM Identity Formation and Media Images of STEM Professionals: Considering the Influence of Contextual Cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, no. 8, Article 716. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00716
35. Stoet G., Geary D.C. The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological science, 2018. Vol. 29(4), 581–593. DOI:10.1177/0956797617741719