Identification of a Person from a Photo in Conditions of Unconscious Perception

The article considers the possibility of studying a person’s awareness of the details of a crime through the analysis of his reactions to unconscious stimuli. The study sets three tasks: 1) analysis of the effectiveness of using polygraph surveys in the process of investigating crimes; 2) analysis of the main approaches to the study of unconscious perception and 3) analysis of the results of an experimental study of the possibility of diagnosing the fact of identifying a person from a photograph in conditions of unconscious perception by the dynamics of physiological reactions of the recognizer. During the experiment, visual stimuli were presented to the subject on a computer monitor: a photograph of a person supposedly familiar to the subject and photographs of people unfamiliar to the subject. The stimuli were presented in series, with the duration of exposure necessary to create conditions for unconscious perception. In parallel with the process of presenting stimuli, galvanic skin reactions (CGR) were recorded in the subject using a polygraph. As a result of the experiment, it was found that there were more pronounced CRS (the average amplitude value is 7.2 mm.) occurring in the subject in response to a photograph of a person presumably familiar to him, compared with CRS (the average amplitude value is 1.8 mm.) occurring in the subject in a photograph of unfamiliar faces. The conclusion was formulated about the possibility of experimental diagnostics of the fact of identification of a person by a photograph, in conditions of unconscious perception, through the analysis of the identifying CRG, recorded using a polygraph. It is proposed to use the mechanism of unconscious perception to identify the features of the awareness of persons about the circumstances of crimes during the investigation.

1. Ganzen V.A. Sistemnye opisaniya v psikhologii. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1984. 176 p. (In Russ.).
2. Gershuni G.V. Izuchenie subsensornykh reaktsii pri deyatel’nosti organov chuvstv. Fiziologicheskii zhurnal SSSR = Physiological Journal of the USSR, 1947. Vol. 33, pp. 393–412 (In Russ.).
3. Druzhinin V.N. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2000. 320 p. (In Russ.).
4. Enikeev M.I. Psikhologiya operativno-rozysknoi deyatel’nosti [Psychology of operational investigative activity]. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya = Juridical Psychology, 2008, no. 2, pp. 2–8 (In Russ.).
5. Kostandov E.A. Vospriyatie i emotsii. Moscow: Meditsina, 1977. 248 p. (In Russ.).
6. Goryainov K.K., Ovchinsky V.S., Sinilov G.K., Shumilov A.Yu. (eds.). Operativno-rozysknaya deyatel’nost’: Uchebnik. 2nd ed. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2004. 848 p. (In Russ.).
7. Abakumova I. V., Ivanov R. S., Kruteleva L. J. Research of psychophysiological characteristics of a person in the situation of revealing concealed information by means of polygraph. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2016, no. 7, pp. 146–147. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.07.426
8. Ahlmeyer S., Heil P., McKee B., English K. The impact of polygraphy on admissions of victims and offenses in adult sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2000. Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 123–138. doi:10.1177/107906320001200204
9. Aleksandrov A.Yu., Uplisova K.O., Ivanova V.Yu. Evoked physiological tremor dynamics on deception related stimuli in concealed information test. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2018. Vol. 131, no. S. Р. 84. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.07.238
10. Bruner J.S., Minturn A.L. Perceptual identification and the perceptual organization. Journal of General Psychology, 1955. Vol. 53, pp. 21–28. doi:10.1080/00221309.1955.9710133
11. Carter B.T., Luke S.G. Best practices in eye tracking research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2000. Vol. 155, pp. 49–62. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.010
12. Dunlap K. Studies from the California Psychological Laboratory: Some peculiarities of fluctuating and inaudible sounds. Psychology Review, 1904, Vol. 11, no. 4-5, pp. 308–318. doi:10.1037/h0073696
13. Gordon N.J., Fleisher W.L. A Realistic Perspective of the Art and Science of Forensic Psychophysiology // European Polygraph. 2013. Vol. 7, no. 3(25), pp. 121–126.
14. Haan E.H.F., Young A.W., Newcombe F. Face recognition without awareness. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2007. Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 385–415. doi:10.1080/02643298708252045
15. Lee E.J., Lee J.H. Increase of Lie Detection Accuracy through Integrated Measurement of Pupil Dilation and Polygraph. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2018. Vol. 131, pp. 124–125. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.07.336
16. Mao Y., Liang Y., Hu Z. Accuracy rate of lie-detection in China: Estimate the validity of CQT on field cases. Physiology & Behavior, 2015. Vol. 140, pp. 104–110. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.11.063
17. Maschke G.W., Scalabrini G.J. The Lie Behind the Lie Detector. 2018 [Elrekrtonnyi resurs]. AntiPolygraph.org. URL: https://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector.pdf (Accessed 04.12.2021).
18. Mcgrath М. The Polygraph: Uses and Misuses. Forensic Investigations. An Introduction. 2017, pp. 277–293. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800680-1.00011-0
19. Trotman G.P., Williams S.E., Quinton M.L., Veldhuijzen van Zanten J.J.C.S. Challenge and threat states: examining cardiovascular, cognitive and affective responses to two distinct laboratory stress tasks. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2018. Vol. 126, pp. 42–51. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.02.004