Attitudes towards Sexual Behaviour among Young People

At the center of psychology of sexuality research problematics of the first decades of the twenty first century was the influence of information technologies and virtualization of culture on the weakening of restraint in sexual behavior. Promiscuous sexual behavior is associated with the demise of traditional family structures and marriage institutions, resuling in increasing health risk on the national scale. The risk group that calls for special attention is young people who are most actively using new technologies and at the same time experiencing a lack of skills in the area of emotional and behavior regulation. Researches in this area try to identify factors behind youth promiscuity: a link between such behavior and increased environmental stresses and unsafe parenting styles have been established. Studies in recent years have, for the first time, revealed a link between the unrestricted use of communication technologies and the choice of promiscuous sexual behavior among young people. It was also established that such sexual behavior was linked to distress, increased risks of sexual harassment and harm to physical health in this age group. The data obtained in these recent studies indicate the presence of a complex problem associated with the psychosexual development of young people, set the task of possible ways to regulate as well as foster self- regulation of sexual behavior adolescence.

1. Buss D.M. Evolutsia sexualnogo vlecheniya. Strategii poiska partnrov [The evolution of desire. Stratigirs of human mating]. Moscow: Aipina Publisher, 2017. 510 p.
2. Garanyan N.G., Shchukin D.A. Chastye sotsial'nye srav neniya kak faktor emotsional'noi dezadaptatsii studentov [Frequent social comparison and emotional maladjustment among students]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoter apiya [Counseling psychology and psychoterapy], 2014, no. 4, pp. 182—206. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
3. Zimbardo P., Coulombe N.D. Muzhchina v otryve [Man disconnected. How technology has sabotaged what it means to be male]. Moscow: Aipina Publisher, 2017. 343 p.
4. Kon I.S. Vvedenie v seksologiyu [Introduction to sexology]. Moscow: Meditsina. 1998. 320 p.
5. Konina M.A., Fenomenologia i patologia sovremennoi seksual'noi kul’ture [Phenomenology and pathology of modern sexual culture]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling psychology and psychoterapy], 2018, no. 1. pp, 76—94. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
6. Konina M.A., Kholmogorova A.B. Strategii seksual’nogo povedeniya v sovremennoi kul’ture. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2015, no. 1, pp. 61—70. doi:10.17759/chp.2015110108. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
7. Konina M.A., Kholmogorova A.B., Sorokova M.G. Fenomen neogranichennogo seksual'nogo povedeniya v sovre mennom obshchestve: patologicheskie tendentsii kul'tury ili patologiya lichnosti [The phenomenon of unrestricted sexual behavior in modern society: pathological culture tendency or personality pathology?]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling psychology and psychoterapy], 2014, no. 2, pp. 88—118. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
8. Konina M.A., Kholmogorova A.B. Fenomen neogranichennogo seksual'nogo povedeniya v istoricheskom kon tekste raznykh tipov seksual'noi kul'tury [The phenomenon of unrestricted sexual behavior in the historical context of differ ent types of sexual culture]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling psychology and psychoterapy], 2014, no. 3, pp. 119—140. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
9. Korolenko Ts.P., Dmitrieva N.V., Sexualnost v postsovetskom mire [Sexuality in the post-Soviet world]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt; Kultura, 2011. 326 p.
10. Perin R.L. Sexsual'nye otnoshenie v degradiruyushchem obshchestve [Sexual the relation in the degrading society].Saint Petersburg: API; Potaennoe, 2009. 136 p.
11. Tkhostov A.Sh., Surnov K.G. Vliyanie sovremennykh tekhnologii na razvitie lichnosti i formirovanie patologich eskikh form adaptatsii: obratnaya storona sotsializatsii [Moden technologies influence on development of the person ality and formation of pathological forms of adaptation: reverse side of socialization]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological magazine], 2005, no. 6, pp. 16—24.
12. Kholmogorova A.B., Garanyan N.G. Mnogofaktornaya model' depressivnykh, trevozhnykh i somatoformnykh rasstroistv kak osnova ikh integrativnoi psikhoterapii [Multiple factor model of depressive, disturbing and somato formnykh of frustration as fundamentals of their integrative psychotherapy]. Sotsial'naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya [Social and clinical psychiatry], 1998, no. 1, pp. 94—102.
13. Shalygina O.V., Kholmogorova A.B. Rol' modnykh kukol v usvoenii nerealistichnykh sotsial'nykh standartov telesnoi privlekatel'nosti u devochek doshkol'nits [The role of fashion dolls in the adoption of unrealistic social standards of bodily attractiveness by preschool girls]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling psychology and psychoterapy], 2014, no. 4, pp. 130—154. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
14. Eizler A. Anatomiya strasti [Passion anatomy]. Moscow: Eksmo, 2011. 224 p.
15. Brennan K.A., Shaver P.R. Dimensions of adult attachment, affect regulation, and romantic relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995, no. 21, pp 267—283.
16. Foster J.D., Shrira L., Campbell W.K. Theoretical models of narcissism, sexuality, and relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2006, no. 23, pp. 367—386.
17. Jonason P.K., Li N.P., Webster G.W., Schmitt D.P. The Dark Triad: Facilitating short term mating in men. European Journal of Personality, 2009, no. 23, pp. 5—18.
18. Kennair L.E.O., Bendixen M. Sociosexuality as predictor of sexual harassment and coercion in female and male high school students. Evolution and Human Behavior, 2012, no. 33, pp. 479—490.
19. Kinsey A., Pomeroy W., Martin C. Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1948. 804 p.
20. Megan L., Monique T., Amita V., Susan W. Social Media and Sexual Behavior Among Adolescents: Is there a link? JMIR Public Health Surveill, 2017. Vol. 3, iss. 2, e28, p.8.
21. O'Keeffe G.S., Clarke-Pearson K., Council O.C. The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 2011 Apr. 127(4), pp. 800-804. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0054.
22. Owuamanam D.O., Bankole M.O. Family type and attitude sexual promiscuity of adolescent students in Ekiti State, Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 2013, June. Vol. 9, pp. 171—177.
23. Posner R.A. Sex and reason. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992. 468 p.
24. Role M. Personality, Sexual A itudes, and Unrestricted Sociosexual Behavior in College Women. Wellesley College, 2012.
25. Schmitt D.P. Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48 nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2005, no. 28, pp. 247—275.
26. Seal D.W., Agostinelli G. Individual differences associated with high risk sexual behavior: implications for intervention programmes. Aids care, 1994. Vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 393—397.
27. The Lancet, 2013. November. Vol. 382. No 9907, pp. 1795 1844.
28. Wright T.M., Reise S.P. Personality and Unrestricted Sexual Behavior: Correlations of Sociosexuality in Caucasian and Asian College Students. Journal of Research in Personality, 1997, June. Vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 166—192.