Comparative Analysis of the Formation of Mathematical Concepts among Students through the Prism of APOS Theory: Urban vs. Rural

The materials presented in the article are devoted to studying the influence of regional characteristics, which define the context of the social component of secondary education (in urban and rural areas), on the formation of mathematical concepts among students. The authors aim to demonstrate the degree of formation of mathematical concepts among students depending on the regional aspect. The study presented in this article involved 96 first-year students from the Institute of Construction at Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering. The research emphasizes that it is grounded in the APOS theory (Action-Process-Object-Schema), which allows for a step-by-step tracking of the understanding process, identifying typical errors and classifying them. According to its principles, a questionnaire was prepared to analyze the process of understanding mathematical concepts among students. The empirical foundation was formed by the data from a written survey conducted among students, with quantitative indicators analyzed at each stage of APOS, considering geographical diversity. Errors were classified as conceptual and procedural, allowing for the recognition of differences in students' competence levels according to the stages of the APOS theory. The work demonstrates the effectiveness of applying the APOS theory to a comparative analysis of the mathematical skills of urban and rural students. The research revealed no statistically significant differences in procedural errors between urban and rural students. The study established that at the Schema stage, statistically significant differences in the mastery of mathematical concepts exist between students from different groups. The article concludes that a step-by-step analysis of students' cognitive development is crucial for identifying their potential and contributes to developing effective teaching methods.

Tuktamyshov N.K., Gorskaya T.Y. Test materials for “Comparative analysis of the formation of mathematical concepts in students through the prism of APOS theory: urban versus rural”: Data set. RusPsyData: Repository of psychological research and tools. Moscow. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48612/MSUPE/xu26-hfxz-h4eh

1. Vygotsky L.S. Myshlenie i rech' [Thinking and speech]. Labyrinth Publishing House Moskow. 1999. 352 p. (In Russ.).
2. Gromova E.V., Safuanov I.S. Primenenie komp'yuternoi matematicheskoi programmy GEOGEBRA v obuchenii ponyatiya funktsii [Application of computer mathematical program GEOGEBRA in teaching the concept of function]. Education and Science, 2014, no. 4(113), pp. 113–131. (In Russ.).
3. Gumerova F.F., Amirova L.A., Kalimullina G.I., Mustaev A.F., Gumerova O.V. Opredelenie uslovii povysheniya kachestva obrazovaniya v sel'skikh shkolakh s nizkimi obrazovatel'nymi pokazatelyami [Determination of conditions for improving the quality of education in rural schools with low educational performance]. Science for education today, 2023. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 85–107. DOI:10.15293/2658-6762.2301.05 (In Russ.).
4. Dalinger V.A. Tipichnye oshibki uchashchikhsya po matematike i ikh prichiny [Typical errors of students in mathematics and their causes]. Modern science-intensive technologies, 2014, no. 12-1, pp. 94–97. (In Russ.).
5. Piaget J. Psikhogenez znanii i ego epistemologicheskoe znachenie [Psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance]. Semiotics. Moscow: Raduga, 1983, pp. 90–101. URL: https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/filosofija_jazyka/semiotika/32-1-0-4352 (In Russ.).
6. Tuktamyshov N.K., Gorskaya T.Y. O roli vizualizatsii v obuchenii matematike (na primere ponyatiya funktsii) [About the role of visualization in teaching mathematics (on the example of the concept of function)]. Vector of Science of Togliatti State University. Series: Pedagogy, Psychology. 2022,no. 3(50), pp. 51–58. EDN: YHNPRL DOI:10.18323/2221-5662-2022-3-51-58 (In Russ.).
7. Tuktamyshov N.K., Gorskaya T.Y. Test materials for “Comparative analysis of the formation of mathematical concepts in students through the prism of APOS theory: urban versus rural": Data set. RusPsyData: Repository of psychological research and tools. Moscow. 2024. DOI:10.48612/MSUPE/xu26-hfxz-h4eh
8. Shvarts A.Yu. Rol' chuvstvennykh predstavlenii v ovladenii matematicheskimi ponyatiyami [The role of sensual representations in mastering mathematical concepts]: diss. ... kand. psychol. Sciences. 2011. 259 p. DOI:10.54359/ps.v4i17.853 (In Russ.).
9. Arnon I. APOS Theory: A Framework for Research and Curriculum Development in Mathematics Education. New York: Springer, 2014. 254 p. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6
10. Asherft M.H. Cognitive and motivational underpinning of mathematical learning difficulties: discussion. International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties. 2019. Switzeland: Springer, pp. 505–518. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-97148-330
11. 11. Azizi H., Herman T. Critical thinking and communication skills of 10th grade students in trigonometry. International Conference on Innovation In Research IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1469. 2020, 012161. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1469/1/012161
12. Benjamini Y. Opening the Box of a Boxplot. The American Statistician: journal, 1988. Vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 257–262. DOI:10.2307/2685133.JSTOR2685133
13. Chesters J., Cuervo H. (In) equality of opportunity: educational attainment of young people from rural, regional and urban Australia. The Australian educational researcher, 2022. Vol. 49(1), pp. 43–61. DOI:10.1007/s13384-021-00432-0
14. Dubinsky E. Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematical Thinking (eds). Advanced Mathematical Thinking. Mathematics Education Library; ed by D. Tall. Dordrecht: Springer, 2002. Vol. 11. DOI:10.1007/0-306-47203-1_7
15. Francis R.D. Movin’ on up? The role of crowing up rural in shaping why Working – class men do-and-don’t – seek to improve their labor-market prospects RSF: The Russel Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences, 2022. Vol. 8(4), pp. 68–86. DOI:10.7758/RSF.2022.8.4.03
16. Koricich A., Chen X., Hughes R.P. Understanding the effects of rurality and socio economic status on college attendance and institutional choice in the United States. Review of higher education, 2018. Vol. 4(2), pp. 281–305. DOI:10.1353/rhe.2018.0004
17. Kuzniak A., Nechache A. Understanding mathematical work and mathematical thinking through individuals’ actions analyses: a networking approach. Proceedings of the CERME12, 2022, pp. 2986–2994. URL: https://hal.science/hal-03749271/document
18. Mali A., Martinez P.H., Anastasakis M., Kouvela E., Treffert-Thomas S. The interplay between person and environment, cognition and emotion: Using the concept of perezhivanie in Mathematics Education. Proceedings of the CERME12, 2022, pp. 3004–3012. URL: https://hal.science/hal-03749275/document
19. Parsons R. Moving Out to Move Up: Higher Education as a Mobility Pathway in the Rural South. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences May 2022. Vol. 8(3), pp. 208–229. DOI:10.7758/RSF.2022.8.3.09
20. Şefik Ö., Erdem Uzun Ö., Dost Ş. Content Analysis of the APOS Theory Studies on Mathematics Education Conducted in Turkey and Internationally: A Meta-Synthesis Study. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 2021. Vol. 15(2), pp. 404–428. DOI:10.17522/balikesirnef.1020526
21. Siyepu S.W. Analysis of errors in derivatives of trigonometric functions. International Journal of STEM Education, 2015. 2:16. DOI:10.1186/s40594-015-0029-5
22. Tuktamyshov N. Mathematical picture of the world and understanding. Proceedings of the CERME12, 2022, pp. 3032–3036. URL: https://hal.science/hal-03749363/document