Localization of Fixations of the Perception Subject's Gaze on the Elements of the External Appearance When Constructing the Age of an Unfamiliar Person: The Priority of the Face

11

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify the localization of fixation of the subject's gaze on the elements of appearance when constructing the age of an unfamiliar person in a situation of presenting portrait (zones "head, hair", "forehead", "left eye", "right eye", "bridge of the nose", "nose", "right cheek", "left cheek", "lips", "chin", "neck", "shoulders", "chest") and full-length images (including additionally the zones "pelvis", "legs"). Methods: 1) the method of oculography using a software and hardware complex, including the Gazepoint GP3 Eye Tracker and the standard Gazepoint Analysis UX Edition (v.6.8.0)x64 software, as well as specially developed software; 2) the procedure of "Photo-visual presentation of appearance" by T.A. Vorontsova (setNo. 1). The study sample included 20 women and 14 men aged 19 to 59 years (M=36.82) as objects of perception; 334 women and 74 men aged 18 to 71 years (M=24.07) as subjects of perception.Results: 1) the features of age construction in the perception of portrait photography are described: the subject of perception within the main scope of viewing portrait photography is fixed on the eye area (1st place), forehead (2nd place), nose (3rd place) (we named the "triangle of interest"); the upper part of the face (forehead, eye area), starting from the second fixation; after the 11th fixation, the gaze of the subject of perception is more focused (compared with previous fixations) on the zones of the lower part of the face, as well as the zones of the neck, shoulders, chest; 2) the features of age construction in the perception of growth photography are revealed: the gaze of the subjects of perception moves to the elements of the face from the second fixation; a third of all fixations takes the proportion of the upper part of the face (forehead and eye area); the maximum concentration of the views of the subjects of perception on the forehead and eye areas was found at the third and fourth fixation; the proportion of the "triangle of interest" is significantly higher than the proportion of the integral "body" area (shoulders, chest, pelvis, legs); the least interest of the subjects of perception in the features of the physique was found at the third fixation, after which attention to them increases to a maximum at the twelfth fixation. The paper concludes that the priority of the face of the object of perception over the body; the priority of the upper part of the face over the lower, the priority of the left half of the face over the right when solving the perceptual task of determining the age of an unfamiliar person. The results obtained are discussed in the context of domestic approaches to communication, appearance, and cognitive processes.

General Information

Keywords: age, perceived age, age construction, appearance, face, physique, social cognition, oculomotor activity, cognitive processes

Journal rubric: Face Science

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2024170306

Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Science Foundation, project number 22-28-01763, https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-28-01763/ at the Southern Federal University.

Received: 19.07.2024

Accepted:

For citation: Vorontsova T.A., Artamonova A.G., Yavna D.V. Localization of Fixations of the Perception Subject's Gaze on the Elements of the External Appearance When Constructing the Age of an Unfamiliar Person: The Priority of the Face. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2024. Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 80–96. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2024170306. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Andreeva G.M. Obraz mira i/ili real'nyi mir? [An image of the world and/or the real world?]. Voprosy psikhologii = Questions of psychology, 2013. Vol. 3, pp. 33—43. (In Russ.).
  2. Andreeva G.M. Psikhologiya sotsial'nogo poznaniya [Psychology of social cognition]. М.: Aspekt Press, 2005. (In Russ.).
  3. Barabanshchikov V.A. (ed.) Kognitivnye mekhanizmy neverbal'noi kommunikatsii [Cognitive mechanisms of nonverbal communication]. М.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2017. (In Russ.).
  4. Barabanshchikov V.A. Dinamika vzora cheloveka v protsesse vospriyatiya vyrazhenii litsa [The dynamics of a person's gaze in the process of perceiving facial expressions]. Litso cheloveka v nauke, iskusstve i praktike [The human face in science, art and practice]. In K.I. Anan'eva, V.A. Barabanshchikov, A.A. Demidov (ed.). М.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2014. Pp. 331—370. (In Russ.).
  5. Bodalev A.A. (ed.) Psikhologiya obshcheniya. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' [Psychology of communication. An encyclopedic dictionary]. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2015. (In Russ.).
  6. Bodalev A.A. Vospriyatie i ponimanie cheloveka chelovekom [The perception and understanding of a person by a person]. М.: MSU, 1982. (In Russ.).
  7. Vorontsova T.A. Otnoshenie k neznakomomu cheloveku i otsenka ego vozrasta po fotoizobrazheniyu litsa, transformirovannogo v prilozhenii FaceApp [The Attitude towards a Stranger and Assessment of his Age based on a Photo Image of a Face Transformed in the FaceApp Application]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya = Experimental Psychology, 2022. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 31—49. DOI:10.17759/exppsy.202215030 (In Russ.).
  8. Kurysheva O.V. Vozrastnye aspekty sotsial'noi kategorizatsii [Age-related aspects of social categorization]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 11: Estestvennye nauki = Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Episode 11: Natural Sciences, 2013. Vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 77—83. (In Russ.).
  9. Labunskaya V.A., Drozdova I.I. Teoretiko-empiricheskiy analiz vliyaniya sotsialno psikhologicheskih faktorov na otsenki, samootsenki molodymi lyudmi vneshnego oblika [Theoretical and empirical analysis of the impact of social and psychological factors on the assessment, self-assessment of young people's appearance]. Rossiyskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal = Russian psychological journal, 2017. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 202—226. DOI:10.21702/rpj.2017.2.1214 (In Russ.).
  10. Labunskaya V.A., Serikov G.V., Shkurko T.A. (ed.) Sotsial'naya psikhologiya vneshnego oblika: teoreticheskie podkhody i empiricheskie issledovaniya. Kollektivnaya monografiya [Social psychology of appearance: theoretical approaches and empirical research. A collective monograph]. Rostov-na-Donu: Mini Taip, 2019. (In Russ.).
  11. Litso cheloveka v nauke, iskusstve i praktike [The human face in science, art and practice] / In K.I. Anan'eva, V.A. Barabanshchikov, A.A. Demidov (ed.). М.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2014. (In Russ.).
  12. Litso cheloveka v prostranstve obshcheniya [A person's face in the communication space] / In K.I. Anan'eva, V.A. Barabanshchikov, A.A. Demidov (ed.). М.: Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Kogito-Tsentr, 2016. (In Russ.).
  13. Litso cheloveka v kontekstakh prirody, tekhnologii i kul'tury [The human face in the context of nature, technology and culture] / In K.I. Anan'eva, V.A. Barabanshchikov, A.A. Demidov (ed.). М.: Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Kogito-Tsentr, 2020–2021. (In Russ.).
  14. Miklyaeva A.V. Vozrastnaya kategorizatsiya v protsesse formirovaniya pervogo vpechatleniya studentov o prepodavatele [Age categorization in the process of forming students' first impression of a teacher]. Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena = Izvestia of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen, 2010. Vol. 136, pp. 14—21. (In Russ.).
  15. Pogontseva D.V. Rol' vozrasta pri otsenke vneshnego oblika cheloveka [The role of age in assessing a person's appearance]. Psikholog = Psychologist, 2018. No. 6, pp. 14—20. DOI:10.25136/2409-8701.2018.6.27961 (In Russ.).
  16. Khoroshilov D.A. Ot sotsial'nogo poznaniya – k epistemologii obshchestva (pamyati G.M. Andreevoi) [From social cognition to the epistemology of society (in memory of G.M. Andreeva)]. Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal = National Psychological Journal, 2016. Vol. 3, no 23, pp. 76—85. DOI:10.11621/npj.2016.0311 (In Russ.).
  17. Shkurko T.A. Fotovideoprezentatsii vneshnego oblika kak metod izucheniya vosprinimaemogo vozrasta cheloveka ["Photo-video presentation of appearance" as a method of a person’s perceived age studying]. Sotsial'naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2018. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 104—117. DOI:10.17759/sps.2018090311.21 (In Russ.).
  18. El'konin D.B. K problem periodizatsii psikhologicheskogo razvitiya v detskom vozraste [To the problem of periodization of psychological development in childhood]. Voprosy psikhologii = Questions of psychology, 1971. No. 4, 6—20. (In Russ.).
  19. Kanan C., Bseiso D.N., Ray N.A., Hsiao J.H., Cottrell G.W. Humans have idiosyncratic and task specific scanpaths for judging faces. Vision Research, 2015. Vol. 108, 67–76. DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2015.01.013
  20. Kurosumi M., Mizukoshi K., Hongo M., Kamachi M.G. Does age-dynamic movement accelerate facial age impression? Perception of age from facial movement: Studies of Japanese women. PLoS ONE, 2021. Vol. 16, Iss. 8, Article e0255570. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0255570
  21. Kwart D.G., Foulsham T., Kingstone A. Age and beauty are in the eye of the beholder. Perception, 2012. Vol. 41, 925—938. DOI:10.1068/p7136
  22. Matts P., Fink B., Grammer K., Burquest B. Color homogeneity and visual perception of age, health, and attractiveness of female facial skin. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2007. Vol. 57, Iss. 6, pp. 977—984. DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.07.040
  23. Rhodes M.G. Age estimation of faces: A review. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2009. Vol. 23, Iss. 1, pp. 1—12. DOI:10.1002/acp.1442
  24. Swift H.J., Abrams D., Drury L., Lamont R. Categorization by Age. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2018. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2431-1

Information About the Authors

Tatyana A. Vorontsova, PhD in Psychology, Head of the Psychology Department, Associate Professor of the Department of Social Psychology of the Academy of Psychology and Pedagogy, Southern Federal University, lecturer of the special faculty of Psychocorrection, Depth Psychology and Psychoanalysis, Faculty of Psychology, Pedagogy and Defectology of the Don State Technical University and the Rostov Branch of the European Confederation of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy. Member of the federal UMO in the system of higher education in enlarged groups of specialties and areas of training 37.00.00 Psychological sciences., Rostov-na-Donu, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1717-7059, e-mail: shkurko@sfedu.ru

Alena G. Artamonova, Senior Lecturer, Chair of Management Psychology and Legal Psychology, Southern Federal University, Rostov-na-Donu, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2152-8325, e-mail: alartamonova@sfedu.ru

Denis V. Yavna, PhD in Psychology, Associcate Professor at the Department of Psychophysiology and Clinical Psychology, Southern Federal University, Rostov-na-Donu, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2895-5119, e-mail: yavna@fortran.su

Metrics

Views

Total: 29
Previous month: 22
Current month: 7

Downloads

Total: 11
Previous month: 8
Current month: 3