Stress of Invisible Information Threats and its Consequences

Relevance. In recent years, studies have accumulated a lot of factual material on the psychological consequences of stress caused by exposure to aggressive environmental factors, including the COVID–19 virus threat factor. In this connection, the task of generalizing and rethinking the role of information threats in the development of psychopathological symptoms in the general population becomes obvious. Goal. The work is devoted to the theoretical and empirical analysis of the psychological consequences of experiencing invisible information threats (viral and radiation threats, the threat of a life–threatening disease, a terrorist threat to indirect victims, emotional violence). Materials and methods: the total sample size for assessing the experience of the COVID–19 virus threat is 712 respondents interviewed in two time periods (from April to May 2020, from October 2021 to May 2022). Empirical data of a cross–cultural project on the study of PTSD in the liquidators of the Chernobyl accident 1992–1994 are also used. laboratories of psychology of post–traumatic stress of the IP RAS under the leadership of N.V. Tarabrina and the psychophysiological laboratory of Harvard Medical School (USA), headed by Professor R. Pitman. To assess the experience of a terrorist threat, empirical data from a 2007 dissertation study Bykhovets Yu.V. Test battery: a questionnaire on the experience of a viral threat, SCL–90–R, PCL–5, SHVS–10, a questionnaire on the prescription and intensity of the disease COVID–19 are used. Results. The dynamics of the psychological state of the population during the COVID–19 pandemic (2020 - 2022) is described. A comparative analysis of the severity of psychopathological symptoms in the liquidators of the Chernobyl accident, indirect victims of terrorist attacks and COVID–19 respondents who were ill/not ill is presented. A comparative analysis of the severity of delayed symptoms, in particular post–traumatic stress disorder, showed that 19,7 % of the liquidators of the Chernobyl accident were diagnosed with PTSD, 24 % of indirect victims of terrorist attacks and 7,25% of people who had Covid–19. Conclusions. According to the study, it can be concluded that the psychological consequences of a collision with invisible information threats are represented by a wide range of negative affectivity, which proves the possibility of attributing these stressors to high–intensity stressors.

1. Ababkov V. A., Baryshnikova K. , Voroncova–Venger O. V. , Gorbunov I. A., Kapranova S. V. , Pologaeva E. A., Stuklov K. A. Validizaciya russkoyazychnoj versii oprosnika «SHkala vospriniimaemogo stressa– 10». Vestnik Sankt–peterburgskogo universiteta, 2016, № 2. Pp. 6¾15.
2. Byhovec YU.V. Predstavleniya o terroristicheskom akte i perezhivanie terroristicheskoj ugrozy zhitelyami raznyh regionov RF. Avtoref.dis, 2007, 19 p.
3. Byhovec YU. V. Razrabotka oprosnika perezhivaniya virusnoj ugrozy [Elektroniy resurs]. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologiya, 2022. Vol.10, № 2. URL: https://mir–nauki.com/PDF/06PSMN222.pdf (accessed 01.03.2023).
4. Byhovec YU.V. Empiricheskoe issledovanie predstavlenij o nevidimyh ugrozah: virusnaya ugroza i terroristicheskie akty. Istoriya, sovremennost' i perspektivy razvitiya psihologii v sisteme Rossijskoj Akademii nauk: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj yubilejnoj nauchnoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj 50–letiyu sozdaniya Instituta psihologii RAN (16.11.2022–18.11.2022). M.: Izd–vo «Institut psihologii RAN», 2022. Pp. 633¾635.
5. Byhovec YU.V., Kogan–Lerner L.B. Pandemiya COVID–19 kak mnogofaktornaya psihotravmiruyushchaya situaciya. Social'naya i ekonomicheskaya psihologiya, 2020. Vol .5, № 2 (18). Pp. 291¾308.
6. Danilov M.N. Ekzistencial'naya problematika pri posttravmaticheskom stressovom rasstrojstve. Voprosy studencheskoj nauki, 2022, № 12 (76). Pp. 414¾420.
7. Enikolopov S. N., Lebedev S. V., Bobosov E. A. Vliyanie ekstremal'nyh sobytij na kosvennyh zhertv. Psihol. Zhurn, 2004. Vol. 25, № 6. Pp. 73¾81.
8. Il'in E.P. Nasilie kak psihologicheskij fenomen. Vestnik gercenovskogo universiteta, 2013, № 1. Pp. 167¾173.
9. Kazymova N.N., Byhovec YU.V., Dymova E.N. Psihotravmiruyushchie posledstviya perezhivaniya emocional'nogo nasiliya zhenshchinami rannego vzroslogo vozrasta. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika.Psihologiya. Sociokinetika, 2019, № 4. Pp.78¾83.
10. Kornilova T. V., CHumakova M. A. SHkaly tolerantnosti i intolerantnosti k neopredelennosti v modifikacii oprosnika C. Badnera. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya, 2014, № 1. Pp. 92¾110.
11. Lidin K.M. Emocii po povodu kovida – opyt kolichestvennogo analiza. Social'naya i ekonomicheskaya psihologiya, 2023. Vol .8, № 2 (30). Pp. 6¾17.
12. Magomed–Eminov M.SH. Novye aspekty psihoterapii posttravmaticheskogo stressa. М.: Insight, 2004. 111 p.
13. Nikitina D.A. Posttravmaticheskij stress u lyudej raznogo vozrasta u lyudej s ugrozhayushchim zhizni zabolevaniem. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2021. 199 p.
14. Sel'e G. Kogda stress ne prinosit gorya.  M.,1992. 162 p.
15. Tarabrina N.V., Lazebnaya E.O., Zelenova M.E., Lasko N.B., Orr S.F., Pitman R.K. Psihofiziologicheskaya reaktivnost' u likvidatorov. avarii na CHAES. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 1996, vol. 17. № 2, pp. 30—45.
16. Tarabrina N.V., Vorona O.A., Kurchakova M.S., Padun M.A., SHatalova N.E. Onkopsihologiya: posttravmaticheskij stress u bol'nyh rakom molochnoj zhelezy, 2010, 175 p.
17. Tarabrina N.V. Posttravmaticheskoe stressovoe rasstrojstvo. Klinicheskaya psihologiya / Pod red. A.B. Holmogorovoj. M.: Izdatel'skij centr «Akademiya»,  2012. Pp. 229¾270.
18. Tarabrina N.V., Harlamenkova N.E., Padun M.A., Hazhuev I.S., Kazymova N.N.,  Byhovec YU.V., Dan M.V. Intensivnyj stress v kontekste psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti. M.: Izd–vo «Institut psihologii RAN», 2017. 344 p.
19. Filippovskaya T.V. Emocional'noe nasilie i real'nye sub"ekty vlasti v aktual'nom obrazovatel'nom prostranstve. Sovremennoe obshchestvo i vlast', 2016, № 2 (8). Pp. 49¾54.
20. Harlamenkova N. E., Nikitina D. A. Psihologicheskie posledstviya vliyaniya stressorov vysokoj intensivnosti raznogo tip. YAroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik, 2020, № 5 (116). Pp. 110¾120. DOI: 10.20323/1813–145X–2020–5–116–110–120
21. Holmogorova A.B., Rahmanina A., Pugovkina O., Roj A., Istomin M., Avakyan T., Karchevskaya N., Petrikov S. Posttravmaticheskij stress u pacientov s COVID–19 posle lecheniya v stacionare. Sovremennaya Terapiya Psihicheskih Rasstrojstv, 2021, № 3. Pp. 58¾67. DOI: 10.21265/PSYPH.2021.90.34.006
22. Cohen S., Kamarck T., Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1983, vol. 24, pp. 385¾396.
23. Derogatis L.R. The SCL–90–R. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research, 1975. 45 p.
24. Salari N., A. Hosseinian–Far, Jalali R., Vaisi–Raygani A., Rasoulpoor S., Mohammadi M., Rasoulpoor S., Khaledi–Paveh B. Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID–19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta–analysis. Global Health, 2020, № 16, p. 57.
25. Schou T.M., Joca S., Wegener G., Bay–Richte C. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID–19 – A systematic review. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2021, Vol. 97. Pp. 328¾348.
26. Weathers F.W., Litz B.T., Keane T.M., Palmieri P.A., Marx B.P., Schnurr P.P. The PTSD Checklist for DSM–5 (PCL–5) 2013 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/adult–sr/ptsd–checklist.asp [Accessed 09.08.2023].