Cultural-Historical Neuropsychology and ADHD: Commentary on the Article “ADHD Diagnosis from the Perspective of Cultural-Historical Neuropsychology” by Athanasios Koutsoklenis, Yulia Solovieva, and Luis Quintanar Rojas

This article presents a commentary on the paper “ADHD Diagnosis from the Perspective of Cultural-Historical Neuropsychology”. The authors of this paper, Athanasios Koutsoklenis, Yulia Solovieva, and Luis Quintanar Rojas, strongly advocate for a paradigm shift from the traditional diagnostic approach to cultural-historical neuropsychology (CHNP). According to the authors, the CHNP approach allows us to reject ADHD diagnosis when assessing the corresponding syndrome. The authors suggest that such a departure from an intermediate level of abstraction (in the form of a diagnosis) in favor of the results of neuropsychological evaluation of a particular child will enable a direct transition to personalized recommendations for corrective and developmental support for that child. Despite the commonality of our initial theoretical positions, namely the principles of cultural-historical psychology and neuropsychology developed by Lev Vygotsky and Alexander Luria, I do not agree with the solution proposed by the authors regarding the issue of diagnosing ADHD. The proposal to renounce the diagnosis of ADHD does not address the issues of providing support to children and their stigmatization. These problems are either resolved or left unresolved depending on the resources available to help a child in a given social context. The solution lies in enhancing the efficiency of the support provided to children, including the neuropsychological support. The rejection of the diagnosis and the attempt to justify this through CHNP involves overlooking several of its key principles, which could ultimately lead to discrediting of CHNP. Furthermore, while rejecting the ADHD diagnosis we simultaneously refuse the necessity to further investigate the mechanisms of the syndrome via current and future scientific tools.

1. Выготский Л.С. К вопросу о компенсаторных процессах в развитии умственно отсталого ребенка: собр. соч. в 6 т. Т. 5: Основы дефектологии. М., Педагогика, 1983. С. 115—136.
   Vygotskii L.S. K voprosu o kompensatornykh protsessakh v razvitii umstvenno otstalogo rebenka: sobr. soch. v 6 t. T. 5: Osnovy defektologii. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983, pp. 115—136.
2. Выготский Л.С. Диагностика развития и педологическая клиника трудного детства: собр. соч. в 6 т. Т. 5: Основы дефектологии. М., Педагогика, 1983. С. 257—321.
   Vygotskii L.S. Diagnostika razvitiya i pedologicheskaya klinika trudnogo detstva: sobr. soch. v 6 t. T. 5: Osnovy defektologii. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983, pp. 257—321.
3. Лурия А.Р. Этапы пройденного пути. Научная автобиография. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1982.
   Luriya A.R. Etapy proidennogo puti. Nauchnaya avtobiografiya. Moscow: Publ. Mosk. un-ta, 1982.
4. Akhutina T.V., Glozman J.M., Moskovich L.I. Short glossary of Lurian terminology / Akhutina T., Glozman J., Moskovich L., Robbins D. (Eds.) // A.R. Luria and Contemporary Psychology: Festschrift celebrating the centennial of his birth. N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers, 2004. P. 199—200.
5. Akhutina T.V., Shereshevsky G. Cultural-historical neuropsychological perspective on learning disability / A. Yasnitsky, van der Veer, M. Ferrari (Eds.) // The Cambridge Handbook of Cultural-Historical Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. P. 350—377.
6. Arnold L.E., Hodgkins P., Kahle J., Madhoo M., Kewley G. Long-term outcomes of ADHD: Academic achievement and performance [Электронный ресурс] // Journal of Attention Disorders. 2020. Vol.24. Issue 1. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054714566076
7. Machinskaya R.I., Semenova O.A. Peculiarities of formation of the cognitive functions in junior school children with different maturity of regulatory brain systems [Электронный ресурс] // Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology. 2004. Vol. 40. № 5. P. 528—538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10893-005-0009-3
8. Pennington F. From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders // Cognition. 2006. Vol. 101. № 2. P. 385—413.
9. Schleim S. Why mental disorders are brain disorders and why they are not: ADHD and the challenges of heterogeneity and reification // Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2022. Vol. 13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.943049
10. Solovieva Y., Quintanar L. Neuropsicología del déficit de atención: de evaluación a su corrección. Puebla: CONCYTEP,