Shared leadership and mental models’ compatibility as predictors of work group resilience

1

Abstract

In a turbulent business environment, the problem arises of ensuring the resilience at work in order to cope with unexpected threats, restore productivity, proactively overcome risks and variability of work processes, gaps in coordination of actions, and create the potential for advanced development based on anticipation. Against the backdrop of extensive research into individual and organizational resilience resources, there has been little research into group resilience factors, among which shared leadership and the compatibility of mental models of group members stand out. Objective: to evaluate the contributions of shared leadership and mental model compatibility as predictors of group resilience. Hypotheses: shared leader- ship and compatibility of members’ mental models have a positive effect on group resilience. Sample: 213 employees of Russian organizations. Methods: Team Resilience Scale; Shared Leadership Inventory in Teams (SPLIT); mental model compatibility scale. Analysis: normal distribution test, correlation (Pearson) and regression analysis; structural equation modeling (AMOS). Results: interrelations between indicators of shared leadership and compatibility of mental models with indicators of group resilience were found (0.43–0.77, padj < 0.01). Predictors of group resilience are indicators of shared leadership (in relationships, in change, and in external communications), as well as a general indicator of the compatibility of mental models. The compatibility of mental models does not have a significant direct effect on the resilience of groups, but at the same time it has a positive effect on resilience through shared leadership — 0.69, which plays the role of a mediator. Shared leadership has a direct positive effect on group resilience — 0.92. The impact of mental model compatibility on resilience occurs when shared leadership emerges from group dynamics, allowing a shared mental model to be used for teamwork. Shared leadership is a priority that interventions should focus on to develop teams in organizations.

General Information

Keywords: organizational resilience resources, team resilience, shared leadership, compatibility of mental models

Journal rubric: Empirical and Experimental Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2024.407

Funding. The study was supported by the grant from the Russian Science Foundation no. 22-28-01232

Received: 22.11.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Lepekhin N.N., Ilyina O.N., Kruglov V.G., Kruglova M.A. Shared leadership and mental models’ compatibility as predictors of work group resilience . Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2024. Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 673–692. DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2024.407. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

Astapenko, Ye. Ye., Kruglova, M. A., Lepekhin, N. N., Manichev, S. A., Fedorov, S. I. (2021). Development of working teams on the basis of proactive interventions in the task solution’s cycles. Peterburgskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 36, 1–54. (In Russian)

Braun, M. T., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Kuljanin, G. (2021). Multilevel theory, methods, and analyses in management. In: M. Hitt (ed.). The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. New York, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.227

Bowers, C., Kreutzer, C., Cannon-Bowers, J., & Lamb, J. (2017). Team resilience as a second-order emergent state: A theoretical model and research directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01360

Brykman, K. M., King, D. D. (2021). A resource model of team resilience capacity and learning. Group & Organization Management, 46 (4), 737–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211018008

Chen, Yi., Zhang, Yi. (2021). Fostering resilience in new venture teams: The role of behavioral and affective integration. Group & Organization Management, 46 (4), 773–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211033164

Chigrina, A. A., Bagrationi, K. A., Nestik, T. A. (2020). Development of the theoretical model of group resilience. Organizatsionnaia psikhologiia, 10 (2), 151–171. (In Russian)

Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. New York, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-12-2022-0086

Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13 (1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7

Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., Pearce, C. L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. The Leadership Quarterly, 17 (3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.002

Galy, A., Chênevert, D., Fouquereau, E., Groulx, P. (2023). Toward a new conceptualization of resilience at work as a meta-construct? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1211538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211538

Garmezy, N., Masten, A. S., Tellegen, A. (1984). The study of stress and competence in children: A building block for developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55, 97–111.

Gichuhi, J. M. (2021). Shared leadership and organizational resilience: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 10, 67–88. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2021.60536

Hartwig, A., Clarke, S., Johnson, S., Willis, S. (2020). Workplace team resilience: A systematic review and conceptual development. Organizational Psychology Review, 10 (3–4), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620919476

Kozlowski, S. W. J., Bell, B. S. (2020). Advancing team learning: Process mechanisms, knowledge outcomes, and implications. In: L. Argote, J. Levine (eds). Oxford Handbook of Organizational Learning (pp. 195–230). New York, Oxford University Press.

Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T. (2018). Unpacking team process dynamics and emergent phenomena: Challenges, conceptual advances, and innovative methods. American Psychologist, 73 (4), 576–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000245

Leipold, B., Greve, W. (2009). Resilience: A conceptual bridge between coping and development. European Psychologist, 14 (1), 40–50.

Lepekhin, N. N., Kruglov, V. G., Kruglova, M. A., Tikhomirova, N. V., Yashina, M. A. (2023). Dispositional predictors of students’ conflict resistance . Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo, 14 (1), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140106 (In Russian)

Lepekhin, N. N., Prozorova, M. P. (2023). Shared leadership and mental models as antecedents of working teams’ resilience. In: M. Yu. Spirina (sci. ed.). Trudy XIV Evraziiskogo nauchnogo foruma: sbornik nauchnykh statei iz materialov XIV Evraziiskogo nauchnogo foruma. Sankt-Peterburg, 15–16 dekabria 2022 goda. Vol. II. (pp. 157–164). St. Petersburg, University under the Interparliamentery Assembly of EURASEC Press. (In Russian)

Lepekhin, N. N. (2023). Shared leadership as team resilience’s factor. Peterburgskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 42, 22–68.

Lisovskaya, A. Yu., Kucherov, D. G., Petrova-Savchenko, A. N., Sokolov, D. N., Alkanova, O. G. (2022). Stable management of human resources: New view on employees’ management. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom, 3, 97–102. (In Russian)

Masten, A. S. (2021). Resilience of children in disasters: A multisystem perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 56 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12737

Mohammed, S., Rico, R., Alipour, K. (2021). Team cognition at a crossroad: Toward conceptual integration and network configurations. Academy of Management Annals, 15 (2), 455–501. https://doi.org10.5465/annals.2018.0159

Raetze, S., Duchek, S., Maynard, M. T., Kirkman, B. L. (2021). Resilience in organizations: An integrative multilevel review and editorial introduction. Group & Organization Management, 46 (4), 607–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211032129

Raetze, S., Duchek, S., Maynard, M. T., Wohlgemuth, M. (2022). Resilience in organization-related research: An integrative conceptual review across disciplines and levels of analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 107 (6), 867–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000952

Rapp, T. L., Mathieu, J. E. (2019). Team and individual influences on members’ identification and performance per membership in multiple team membership arrangements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104 (3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000344

Scott-Young, C. M., Georgy, M., Grisinger, A. (2019). Shared leadership in project teams: An integrative multi-level conceptual model and research agenda. International Journal of Project Management, 37, 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.02.002

Sharma, S., Sharma, S. K. (2016). Team resilience: Scale development and validation. Vision, 20, 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262916628952

Stoyanovich, M. (2023). Shared leadership as a predictor of job crafting. In: A. V. Shaboltas (ed.). Psikhologiia XXI veka — 2023: nauka kak svoboda i tvorchestvo: sbornik tezisov uchastnikov XXVII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh, Sankt-Peterburg, 10–12 maya 2023 goda (pp. 290–291). St. Petersburg, Skifiia-print Publ. (In Russian)

van Rensburg, J. J., Santos, C. M., de Jong, S. B. (2023). Sharing time and goals in dyads: How shared tenure and goal interdependence influence perceived shared mental models. Team Performance Management, 29 (3–4), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-12-2022-0086

van Rensburg, J. J., Santos, C. M., de Jong, S. B., Uitdewilligen, S. (2022). The five-factor perceived shared mental model scale: A consolidation of items across the contemporary literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784200

Zautra, A. J., Reich, J. W. (2011). Resilience: The meaning, methods, and measures of a fundamental characteristic of human adaptation. In: S. Folkman (ed.). Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping (pp. 173–185). New York, Oxford University Press.

Wu, Q., Cormican, K. (2021). Shared leadership and team effectiveness: An investigation of whether and when in engineering design teams. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569198

Information About the Authors

Nikolay N. Lepekhin, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Ergonomics and Engineering Psychology, St. Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9160-0519, e-mail: n.lepehin@spbu.ru

Olga N. Ilyina, graduate student, junior researcher, St Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8477-2507, e-mail: MoyaPochtaOI@mail.ru

Vladimir G. Kruglov, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Ergonomics and Engineering Psychology, St. Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8282-5476, e-mail: v.kruglov@spbu.ru

Marina A. Kruglova, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Ergonomics and Engineering Psychology, St. Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7959-7097, e-mail: m.kruglova@spbu.ru

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 2
Previous month: 0
Current month: 2

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 1
Previous month: 0
Current month: 1

 Total

Whole time: 3
Previous month: 0
Current month: 3