Features of Coping with Situations of Change among Representatives of Azerbaijani Culture

The article is devoted to the analysis of the response of Azerbaijanis to life situations of change. Since the situations of change are characterized by dynamism, uncertainty and a great expenditure of resources, and the perception of such events is often associated with stress and threat, the phenomenon of responding to changes and structural uncertainty may be studied in the context of coping. The empirical research was conducted out within the framework of mixed methods approaches and included two stages. At the first stage, the quantitative data of the Azerbaijani sample (N = 278) were analyzed. The indicators of consistency and intercorrelations of scales, descriptive statistics, as well as the results of the exploratory factor analysis of the questionnaire “Types of response to a changing situation” were considered. Changes in the psychometric properties of the questionnaire were identified. In order to explain the discovered facts at the second stage, qualitative data were analyzed: descriptions of response models to changes (N = 42; using the method of grounded theory in the version of K. Charmaz) and explanations of the drawings “Image of changes” (N = 88). It was found that the majority of Azerbaijani respondents report a rare preference for structural uncertainty and a frequent desire to maintain the stability of the situation. The difference between the models of response to changes described by Azerbaijani and Russian students-psychologists is shown. While the methods are called similar (planning, positive reappraisal, etc.), their combination in models, and categorization (whether the action refers to acceptance or rejection of changes) diverge. Based on the analysis of quantitative and qualitative data, an ambivalent response is described: the use of both accepting and rejection the change strategies. The results are discussed in two contexts: 1) cultural values of Azerbaijan (collectivism, orientation on rules); 2) the need to comprehensively consider of coping strategies. The study expands the understanding of the mechanisms of cultural determination of coping with the situation of change, and offers a new data analysis scheme that allows to identify cultural differences.

Agadullina, E. R., Belinskaya, E. P., Juraeva, M. R. (2020). Personal and situational predictors of proactive coping with difficult life situations: cross-cultural differences. National Psychological Journal, 3 (39), 30–38. (In Russian)

Bazarov, T. Yu., Sycheva, M. P. (2012). Development and approbation of “Change Response Styles Questionnaire”. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 5 (25), 12. (In Russian)

Bityutskaya, E. V. (2020а). Representations of coping strategies of care in drawings. Creativity in the modern world: man, society, technology: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of Ya. A. Ponomareva (pp. 71–72). D. V. Ushakov, I. Yu. Vladimirov, A. A. Medyntsev (eds). Moscow, Institute of Psychology of the RAS Press. (In Russian)

Bityutskaya, E. V. (2020b). Structure and dynamics of the image of a difficult life situation. Voprosy psikhologii, 66 (3), 116–131. (In Russian)

Bityutskaya, E. V. (2020c). Man and the situation of uncertainty: interaction strategies. In: Personality of a professional: development, education, health: Collection of scientific articles (pp. 44–50). Iss. 5. Omsk. Kielce. Plovdiv. Rev. E. S. Asmakovets (ed.). Omsk, KAN Publ. (In Russian)

Bityutskaya, E. V., Bakhanova, E. A., Korneev, A. A. (2015). Modeling the process of coping with a difficult life situation. National Psychological Journal, 2, 41–55. (In Russian)

Bityutskaya, E. V., Bazarov, T. Yu. (2019). Features of the perception of life events by people with different preferred styles of responding to changes. Voprosy psikhologii, 3, 94–106. (In Russian)

Bityutskaya, E. V., Bazarov, T. Yu., Korneev, A. A. (2021). Questionnaire types of response to the situation of changes: the structure of scales and psychometric indicators. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 18 (2), 297–316. (In Russian)

Charmaz, K. (2015). Grounded theory. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–84). J. A. Smith (ed.). London, SAGE Publications Ltd.

Colombatto, E. (2016). Markets morals, and policy-making: A new defense of free-market economics thought. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Furnham, A., Marks, J. (2013). Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Recent Literature. Psychology, 4 (9), 717–728.

Grishina, N. V. (2013). Changes in the life situation: a situational approach. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 6 (30), 3. (In Russian)

Guliyev, G. (2002). Archetypal Azeri: faces of mentality. Baku, Eni Nesil Publ. (In Russian)

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. London, Beverly Hills, SAGE Publications.

Kolantaevskaya, A. S., Grishina, N. V., Bazarov, T. Yu. (2016). Stylistic features of self-determination in situations of life changes. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Ser. 16. Psychology. Pedagogy, 4, 51–62. (In Russian)

Kryukova, T. L., Gushchina, T. V. (2015). Culture, stress and coping: sociocultural contextualization of coping behavior. Kostroma, KSU Nekrasov Press, KSTU Press. (In Russian)

Kuo, B. C. (2013). Collectivism and coping: current theories, evidence, and measurements of collective coping. International Journal of Psychology, 48 (3), 374–388.

Leontiev, D. A. (2015). The challenge of uncertainty as a central problem of personality psychology. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 8 (40). (In Russian)

Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. D. Cartwright (ed.). New York, Harper.

Mursalyeva, G. M. (2020). The structure of the ethnic identity of modern adolescents in the intercultural space. Kronos: social sciences, 1 (18), 37–40. (In Russian)

Pankratova, A. A., Osin, E. N., Gasanova, U. U. (2017). The level of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism in Russia and Azerbaijan. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 10 (55). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v10i55.352 (In Russian)

Pervushina, O. N. (2007). Man and uncertainty: On the approaches to the statement of the problem. Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Ser. Psychology, 1 (1), 11–19. (In Russian)

Poddyakov, A. N. (2001). Development of zeal for search in childhood. Dr. Sci. thesis. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University Press. (In Russian)

Psychology of personality: Staying in change (2019). N. V. Grishina (ed.). St Petersburg, St Petersburg University Press. (In Russian)

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York, Free Press.

Rosen, N. O., Ivanova, E., Knäuper, B. (2014). Differentiating intolerance of uncertainty from three related but distinct constructs. Anxiety, Stress, Coping, 27 (1), 55–73.

Sokolova, E. T. (2015). Shock from a collision with sociocultural uncertainty: a clinical view. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia, 8 (40). (In Russian)

Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York, McGraw-Hill.

Veraksa, N. E. (2015). Forms of representation of the situation among preschoolers. Vestnik of Russian State Humanitarian University. Ser. Psychology. Pedagogy. Education, 1, 55–64. (In Russian)

Wong, P. T. P., Reker, G. T., Peacock, E. J. (2006). A resource-congruence model of coping and the development of the coping schemas inventory. In: Handbook of Multicultural Perspectives on Stress and Coping (pp. 223–283). P. T. P. Wong, L. C. J. Wong (еds). New York, Springer Publishing.

Zhdanova, A. V. (2020). Cultural-ethnic and psychological features of the experiences of Azerbaijanis in extreme situations. Vestnik of science and practice, 6 (3), 491–497. (In Russian)