Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology
2022. Vol. 12, no. 3, 309–330
doi:10.21638/spbu16.2022.305
ISSN: 2658-3607 / 2658-6010 (online)
Adaptation of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing People Self-Identification Scale (DIDS)
Abstract
One obstacle in understanding deafness as a cultural difference is the absence of models and methods that could study the acculturation or identity of deaf people in modern Russia. Approbation and validation of deaf and hard-of-hearing people self-identification scale (DIDS), based on the Glickman model of the development of cultural identity, could contribute to the study of acculturation of deaf people in Russia, and create a reliable methodological tool for practical psychologists working in the system of special secondary and higher professional education. The purpose of this article is to present materials of the step-by-step psychometric verification of the DIDS questionnaire, obtained on a sample of deaf and hard of hearing students studying in different institutional settings, aged 17 to 41 (N = 420, M = 21.88; SD = 5.24). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that all scales are independent of each other. To check the consistency of the scales, the Cronbach coefficient was used. It demonstrated high consistency of each scale in the general sample (α-Cronbach from 0.704 to 0.767), as well as on subsamples of men and women (α-Cronbach from 0.629 to 0.801) and in different age groups (α-Cronbach from 0.687 to 0.862). To check the stability of the scales, an analysis was also carried out on subsamples of persons with varying degrees of hearing loss (α-Cronbach from 0.653 to 0.832) and without it (α-Cronbach from 0.688 to 0.801). To check the internal consistency of the questionnaire, a correlation analysis was carried out both within the scales and between them. The results obtained confirmed the conformity of the considered construct. As a result, the Russian adaptation of the American DIDS scale was reduced by 20 statements, which increased the internal consistency and reliability of the methodology. Analysis of the psychometric properties of the DIDS scale confirmed the possibility of its usage in deaf and hard of hearing Russians.
General Information
Keywords: identification, acculturation, deaf, biculturalism, marginality
Journal rubric: Empirical and Experimental Research
Article type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.305
For citation: Mikhailova N.F., Krasko A.S., Fattakhova M.E., Mironova M.A., Vyacheslavova E.V. Adaptation of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing People Self-Identification Scale (DIDS). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2022. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 309–330. DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2022.305. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
References
Anderson, G., Rosten, E. (1985). Towards evaluating process variables in counseling deaf people: A crosscultural perspective. In: G. Anderson, D. Watson (eds), Counseling deaf people: Research and practice. Arkansas, Arkansas Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Deafness and Hearing Impairment, pp. 162–182.
Bat-Chava, Y. (1994). Group identification and self-esteem in deaf adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 494–502.
Bat-Chava, Y. (2000). Diversity of deaf identities. American Annals of the Deaf, 145, 420–427.
Birman, D. (1994). Acculturation and human diversity in a multicultural society. In: E. Trickett, R. Watts, D. Birman (eds), Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 261–284.
Fisher, L., McWhirter, J. (2001). The Deaf Identity Development Scale: A revision and validation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, July, vol. 3, pp. 355–358.
Glickman, N. (1986). Cultural identity, deafness and mental health. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf, 20 (2), 1–10.
Glickman, N. (2001). Deaf identity development: Construction and validation of a theoretical model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA — 1993. Journal of Counseling Psychology. July, 48, 3, 355–358. https://doi.org/12.1037/0022-0167.48.3.355
Glickman, N., Zitter, S. (1989). On establishing a culturally affirmative psychiatric inpatient program for deaf people. Journal of the American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association, 23 (2), 46–59.
Glickman, N., Carey J. (1993). Measuring deaf cultural identities: A preliminary investigation. Rehabilitation psychology, 38 (4), 275–283.
Higgins, P. (1980). Outsiders in a hearing world: A sociology of deafness. New York, Wiley.
Jambor, E., Elliott, M. (2005). Self-esteem and coping strategies among deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10 (1), 63–81.
Johnson, R. E., Erting, C. (1989). Ethnicity and socialization in a classroom for deaf children. In: C. Lucas (ed.), The sociolinguistics of the Deaf community (pp. 41–83). New York, Academic Press.
Kannapell, B. (1989). Inside the deaf community. In: S. Wilcox (ed.), American deaf culture: An anthology (pp. 21–28). Silver Spring, MD, Linstock Press.
Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. (1994). The African American acculturation scale: Development, reliability and validity. Journal of Black Psychology, 20, 104–127.
Lane, H., Hoffmeister, R., Bahan B. A journey into the deaf world. San Diego, Dawn Sign Press, 1996.
Leigh, I. (1999). Inclusive education and personal development. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 3, 236–245.
Leigh, I., Marcus, A., Dobosh, P., Allen, T. (1998). Deaf/hearing identity paradigms: Modification of the Deaf Identity Development Scale. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 3, 330–338.
Maxwell-McCaw, D. (2001). Acculturation and psychological well-being in deaf and hard-of-hearing people, unpublished doctoral dissertation. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
Maxwell-McCaw, D., Zea, M. (1998). The Deaf Acculturation Scale (DAS): Development, reliability and validity. Poster session presented at the 106th Annual Convention on the American Psychological Association San Francisco, CA. San Fransisco.
Maxwell-McCaw, D., Zea, M. (2011). The Deaf Acculturation Scale (DAS): Development and Validation of a 58-Item Measure. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16 (3), 325–342. Available at: http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/ at New York University on May 10, 2015.
Mikhailova, N., Fattahova, M., Mironova, M., Vyacheslavova, E. (2019). Psychological adaptation of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Future Academy. The European proceedings of social and behavioral sciences — EpSBS, PSYRGGU 2019: Psychology of subculture: Phenomenology and Contemporary Tendencies of Development, vol. LXIV, 398–405. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.07.52
Nikolaraizi, M., Hadjikakou, K. (2006). The role of educational experiences in the development of deaf identity. Journal of deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 477–492.
Schein, J., Delk, M. (1974). The deaf population of the United States. Silver Spring, MD, National Association of the Deaf.
Sen, A. (2006). Identity and Violence: The illusion of destiny. New York, W. W. Norton & Company.
Wald, R., Knutsen, J. (2000). Deaf cultural identity of adolescents with and without cochlear implants. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 12 (Suppl. 185), 87–89.
Yasin, M. I. (2016). The attitude of the deaf and hard of hearing to inclusive education. Modern education, 3, 94–100. (In Russian)
Yasin, M. I. (2019). Deaf and hard of hearing students in inclusive higher education: Opportunities and barriers. Journal of Social Policy Research, 17 (4), 601–614. (In Russian)
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Views
Total: 142
Previous month: 7
Current month: 6
Downloads
Total: 110
Previous month: 8
Current month: 8