Metacognitive Regulation, Basic Psychological Needs and Subjective Vitality Of First Year University Students

Intellectual performance is influenced by many factors, besides intelligence and cognitive skills, including the type of motivation and metacognitive regulation. The authors of the article became interested in the question of whether there is a connection between productivity of metacognitive regulation and different types of motivation (extrinsic and intrinsic). According to the self-determination theory (SDT), maintaining intrinsic (autonomous) motivation requires satisfying of one’s basic psychological needs. Also, SDT distinguishes the concepts of self-control and self-regulation (a particular case of which is metacognitive regulation) and postulates the existence of a connection between self-regulation and the level of subjective vitality. The aim of the study was to test the following hypothesis: the higher the level of satisfaction of three basic psychological needs and the level of subjective vitality, the higher the level of productivity of metacognitive regulation of intellectual performance. Participants (first year university students, n = 116, 70 men) completed Russian versions of two questionnaires, created inside the SDT paradigm: “Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale” and “Subjective Vitality Scale”. To assess the productivity of metacognitive regulation of intellectual activity, a new modified version of the questionnaire “Features of intellectual activity” (D. N. Makarova, M. V. Osorina) was used. Multiple regression analysis was performed using SPSS to test the hypothesis. The final model, which explains 31.4 % of the variance of the dependent variable, shows that the higher the level of subjective vitality and the levels of satisfaction of need in autonomy and competence, the higher the level of productivity of meta- cognitive regulation of intellectual performance. The proposed hypothesis was partly refuted: no relationship was found between the level of satisfaction of the need in relatedness and the level of productivity of metacognitive regulation.

Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory. Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development and Wellness. New York, Guilford Press, 2017.

Gagne M., Deci E.L. Self-determination Theory and Work Motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2005, vol. 26, pp. 331–362.

Ohtani K., Hisasaka T. Beyond intelligence: a meta-analytic review of the relationship among metacognition, intelligence, and academic performance. Metacognition Learning, 2018, vol. 13 (2), pp. 179–212.

Cerasoli C.P., Nicklin J.M., Ford M.T. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2014, vol. 140 (4), pp. 980–1008.

Makarova D.N. Manifestation of intellectual competencies while solving cognitive tasks of different types. Master degree thesis. Saint Petersburg, 2014. (In Russian)

Osorina M.V., Shcherbakova O.V., Avanesyan M.O. Problems of metacognitive regulation: standards and non-productive patterns of intellectual performance. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 2011, iss. 2, pp. 32–43. (In Russian)

Shcherbakova O.V. Information and energy aspects of organization of some patterns of metacognitive regulation. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 2012, iss. 3, pp. 103–114. (In Russian)

Veenman M.V.J., Spaans M.A. Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 2005, vol. 15, pp. 159–176.

van der Stel M., Veenman M.V.J. Relation between intellectual ability and metacognitive skillfulness as predictors of learning performance of young students performing tasks in different domains. Learning and Individual Differences, 2008, vol. 18, pp. 128–134.

van der Stel M., Veenman M.V.J. Metacognitive skills and intellectual ability of young adolescents: a longitudinal study from a developmental perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2014, vol. 29, pp. 117–137.

Veenman M.V.J., van Cleef, D. Measuring metacognitive skills for mathematics: students’ selfreports versus on-line assessment methods. ZDM Mathematics Education, 2019, vol. 51, p. 691.

Stephanou G., Mpiontini M.Metacognitive Knowledge and Metacognitive Regulation in Self-Regulatory Learning Style, and in Its Effects on Performance Expectation and Subsequent Performance across Diverse School Subjects. Psychology, 2017, vol. 8, pp. 1941–1975.

Dent A. L., Koenka A.C. The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 2016, vol. 28, pp. 425–474. 14. Cho M., Shen D. Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 2013, vol. 34 (3), pp. 290–301.

Lee H.W., Lim K.Y., Grabowski B.L. Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2010, vol. 58, pp. 629–648.

Makarova D.N. Individual Patterns of Metacognitive Regulation of Students’ Intellectual Activity. Petersburg Psychological Journal, 2018, no. 22. (In Russian)

Makarova D.N. Productive and unproductive patterns of metacognitive regulation of intellectual performance. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2020, vol. 10, iss. 2, pp. 184–193. (In Russian)

Makarova D.N. Productive and unproductive patterns of metacognitive regulation of intellectual performance. XVI European Congress of Psychology (ECP 2019) 2‒5 July 2019. Moscow, Moscow University Press, pp. 1126–1227.

Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development and Well-being. American Psychologist, 2000, vol. 55 (1), pp. 68–78.

Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 2000, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268.

Koestner R., Losier G.F., Vallerand R.G., Carducci D.Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, vol. 70, pp. 1025–1036.

Chatzisarantis N.L.D., Biddle S.G.H., Meek G.A. A self-determination theory approach to the study of intentions and the intention-behavior relationship in children physical activity. British Journal of Health Psychology, 1997, vol. 2, pp. 343–360.

Blais M.R., Sabourine S., Boucher C., Vallerand R.J. Toward a motivational model of couple happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, vol. 59, pp. 1021–1031.

Miserandino M. Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1996, vol. 88, pp. 203–214.

Grolnick W. S., Ryan R.M. Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, vol. 52, pp. 890–898.

Vallerand R.J., Bissonnette R. Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective Study. Journal of Personality, 1992, vol. 60, pp. 599–620.

Chen B., Vansteenkiste M., Beyers W., Boone L., Deci E.L., Duriez B., Lens W., Matos L., Mouratidis A., Ryan R.M., Sheldon K.M., Soenens B., Van Petegem S., Van der Kaap-Deeder J., Verstuyf J. Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and emotion, vol. 39, pp. 216–236.

Ryan R.M., Frederick C.M. On energy, personality and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of personality, vol. 65, pp. 529–565.

Zuffianò A., Alessandri G., Gerbino M., Luengo Kanacri B.P., Di Giunta L., Milioni M., Caprara G.V. Academic achievement: The unique contribution of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning beyond intelligence, personality traits, and self-esteem. Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 23, pp. 158– 162.