Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology
2016. Vol. 6, no. 4, 88–96
ISSN: 2658-3607 / 2658-6010 (online)
Are They Different or the Same? Experts’ Psychometric IQ does not Correlate with Conceptual Abilities
Abstract
In this paper, we describe the results of a study (N = 16, aged 19 to 39), which aimed to test the hypothesis about the correlation between the level of psychometric IQ (measured with J. Raven’s SPMT) and the level of conceptual abilities. Th e main finding of this study was that psychometric IQ shows a lack of correlation with conceptual abilities in experts who face cognitive challenges on a daily basis and manifest real-life intellectual productivity. This leads to the necessity of revising the existing approaches to understanding intellectual productivity and its measurement.
General Information
Keywords: intellectual productivity, psychometric IQ, conceptual abilities, J. Raven’s “Standard Progressive Matrices” test, “Integral Conceptual Structures” test
Journal rubric: General Psychology, Personality Psychology, History of Psychology
Article type: scientific article
Funding. The research was supported by the grant of the President of Russia № МК–7507.2016.6 “Psychological and psychophysiological bases of experts’ intellectual productivity”.
For citation: Shcherbakova O.V., Makarova D.N. Are They Different or the Same? Experts’ Psychometric IQ does not Correlate with Conceptual Abilities . Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2016. Vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 88–96.
References
Burks B. S., Jensen D. W., Terman L. M. The promise of youth. L. M. Terman. Genetic studies of genius (Vol. 3). Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 1930.
Miles T. R. On Defining Intelligence. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1957, vol. 27, pp. 153–167.
McNemar Q. Lost: Our Intelligence? Why? American Psychologist, 1964, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 871–882.
Frederiksen N. Toward a broader conception of human intelligence. American Psychologist, 1986, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 445 — 452.
Howe M. J. Intelligence as an explanation. British Journal of Psychology, 1988, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 349 — 360.
Miles T. R. Comment on Howe’s Paper. British Journal of Psychology, 1988, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 535–538.
Anastasi A. U., Urbina A. S. Psychological testing. Ann Arbor, MI, Prentice Hall, 1997.
Holodnaja M. A. Psikhologiia intellekta: paradoksy issledovaniia. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. [ Psychology of Intelligence: Research Paradoxes. 2nd ed., revised and enlarged]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002. (In Russian)
Grabner R. H. The role of intelligence for performance in the prototypical expertise domain of chess. Intelligence, 2014, vol. 45, pp. 26–33.
Ruthsatz J. Putting practice into perspective: Child prodigies as evidence of innate talent. Intelligence, 2014, vol. 45, pp. 60–65.
Kholodnaia M. A. Psikhologiia poniatiinogo myshleniia: ot kontseptual’nykh struktur k poniatiinym sposobnostiam [ Psychology of Conceptual Thinking: From Conceptual Structures to Conceptual Abilities]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Print, 2012. (In Russian)
Kholodnaya M. A., Volkova E. V. Conceptual Structures, Conceptual Abilities and Productivity of Cognitive Functioning: The Ontological Approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, vol. 217, pp. 914–922.
Ericsson K. A. Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms. Intelligence, 2014, vol. 45, pp. 81–103.
Carpenter P. A., Just M. A., Shell P. What one intelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological review, 1990, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 404–431.
McCallum R. S., Bracken B. A., Wasserman J. D. Essentials of nonverbal assessment. New York, Wiley, 2001.
Raven J. Raven’s progressive matrices: Their origin and contribution to society. Psikhodiagnostika v sotsialisticheskikh stranakh. Psikhodiagnosticheskii biulleten’. I–IX [Psychodiagnostics in Socialistic Countries. Psychodiagnostics Bulletin. I–IX]. Bratislava, 1985, pp. 27–31.
Raven J. The Raven Progressive Matrices: A review of national norming studies and ethnic and socioeconomic variation within the United States. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1989, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–16.
Cattell R. B. Abilities: Their growth, structure, and action. Boston, Houghton Miffl in, 1971.
Nasledov A. D. Matematicheskie metody psikhologicheskogo issledovaniia. Analiz i interpretatsiia dannykh. Uchebnoe posobie [ Mathematical Techniques in Psychology Research. Data Analysis and Interpreta-tion. A Study Guide]. St. Petersburg, Retch Publ., 2004. (In Russian)
Kholodnaia M. A., Shcherbakova O. V., Gorbunov I. A., Golovanova I. V., Papovian M. I. Informat-sionno-energeticheskie kharakteristiki razlichnykh tipov kognitivnoi deiatel’nosti [Information-energetic characteristics of various patterns of cognitive performance]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [ Psychology Journal], 2013, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 96–107. (In Russian)
Shcherbakova O. V., Makarova D. N. Conceptual abilities as a basis of expertise. 15th Annual Conference of the International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR) . Graz, Austria, December 12–14, 2014, pp. 62.
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Views
Total: 102
Previous month: 6
Current month: 4
Downloads
Total: 31
Previous month: 1
Current month: 0