Cross-Cultural Differences in Love Attitudes of Belarusians and Chinese

Objectives. Study of cross-cultural differences in love attitudes of Belarusians and Chinese. Background. A large number of cross-cultural studies focus on comparing the psychological characteristics of representatives of two polar cultures — individualistic and collectivist. At the same time, little attention is paid to the study and explanation of the differences within each of these cultures. Although it is quite obvious that countries belonging to the same culture may differ significantly due to their cultural-specific features, traditions, state structure, and religions. In this regard, the study was aimed at identifying differences in such a cultural universal as love, namely, in the love attitudes of Belarusians and Chinese, who are representatives of collectivist culture. Study design. The study was conducted using a survey method. For data processing and analysis, descriptive statistics and Student t-test were used. Participants. The respondents were 1344 people, representatives of the Belarusian (men, N=544; women, N=560) and Chinese (men, N=120; women, N=120) samples, aged 17-30 years. Measurements. Love Attitudes Scale by C. Hendrik, S. Hendrik. Results. Chinese men differ from Belarusian men with higher scores of attitudes Agape, Pragma, Mania, Storge and Ludus. Belarusian women differ from Chinese women with higher Eros attitudes. In turn, Chinese women in comparison with Belarus, have higher rates of Pragma, Storge, and Ludus. At¬titudes Eros and Agape occupy the top position in the hierarchy of love attitudes of Belarusian men and women, and attitudes Agape and Pragma — in Chinese. Ludus, regardless of gender and nationality, has the least power. Conclusions. The results of the study contribute to the understanding of differences in love styles depending on belonging to Western and Eastern collectivist subcultures.

1. Fourmanov I.А. Lyubovnye attityudy v period perekhoda k ranney vzroslosti: mezhpokolennoe sravnenie [Love attitudes during the transition to early adulthood: intergenerational comparison] // Pravo. Ekonomika. Psikhologiya. Nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal = Law. Economy. Psychology. Scientific and practical journal, 2019, no. 4(16), pp. 97—105. (In Russ.).
2. Aumer-Ryan K., Hatfield E., Frey R. Examining equity theory across cultures // Interpersona. 2007. № 1(1). P. 61—75. DOI:10.5964/ijpr.v1i1.5
3. Butler R., Walker W.R., Skowronski J.J., Shannon L. Age and responses to the Love Attitudes Scale: Consistency in structure, differences in scores // International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 1995. Vol. 40. Р. 281—296. DOI:10.2190/YAA7-3C7G-TVXT-VATB
4. Country Comparison [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/ country-comparison/belarus/ (дата обращения: 12.02.2021).
5. de Munck V.C., Korotayev A., de Munck J., Khaltourina D. Cross-Cultural Analysis of Models of Romantic Love Among U.S. Residents, Russians, and Lithuanians // Cross-Cultural Research. 2011. Vol. 45(2). P. 128—154 DOI:10.1177/1069397110393313
6. Dion K.K., Dion K.L. Psychological individualism and romantic love // Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1991. Vol. 6(1). P. 17—33.
7. Dion K.K., Dion K.L. Culture and relationships: The downside of self-contained individualism / In R.M. Sorrentino, D. Cohen, J.M. Olson, M.P. Zanna (eds.) // Culture and social behavior: The Ontario Symposium Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 2005. Vol. 10. P. 77—94.
8. Dion K.L., Dion К.K. Gender and ethnocultural comparisons in styles of love // Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1993. Vol. 17. P. 463—473. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00656.x
9. Gao G. Intimacy, passion, and commitment in Chinese and US American romantic relationships // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2001. Vol. 25(3). P. 29—342.
10. Goodwin R., Findlay C. “We were just fated together”. Chinese love and the concept of yuan in England and Hong Kong // Personal Relationships. 1997. Vol. 4. P. 85—92. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00132.x
11. Hendrick C., Hendrick S. A theory and method of love // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986. Vol. 50. Р. 392—402. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.392
12. Jankowiak W.R., Fischer E.F. A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Romantic Love // Ethnology. 1992. Vol. 31(2). Р. 149—155. DOI:10.2307/3773618
13. Jankowiak W., Shen Y., Yao S., Wang C., Volsche S. Investigating Love’s Universal Attributes: A Research Report From China // Cross-Cultural Research. 2015. Vol. 49(4). P. 422—436. DOI:10.1177/1069397115594355
14. Karandashev V. A Cultural Perspective on Romantic Love // Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 2015. Unit 5. Subunit 4. DOI:10.9707/2307-0919.1135
15. Lee J.A. The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Don Mills, Ontario: New Press, 1973. 294 p.
16. Lee J.A. A typology of styles of loving // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1977. Vol. 3(2). P. 173—182. DOI:10.1177/014616727700300204
17. Neto F. Love Styles: A Cross-Cultural Study of British, Indian, and Portuguese College Students // Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 2007. Vol. 38(2). Р. 239—254. DOI:10.3138/ jcfs.38.2.239
18. Neto F., Mullet E., Deschamps J-C., Barros J., Benvindo R., Camino L., Falcon A., Kagibanga V., Machado M. Cross-Cultural Variations in Attitudes Toward Love // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2000. Vol. 31. P. 626—635. DOI:10.1177/0022022100031005005
19. Raffagnino R., Puddu L. Love Styles in Couple Relationships: A Literature Review // Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2018. Vol. 6. Р. 307—330. DOI:10.4236/jss.2018.612027
20. Schmitt D.P., Youn G., Bond B., Brooks S., Frye H., Johnson S., Stoka C. When will I feel love? The effects of culture, personality, and gender on the psychological tendency to love // Journal of Research in Personality. 2009. Vol. 43(5). P. 830—846. DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.05.008
21. Sprecher S., Toro-Morn M. A study of men and women from different sides of earth to determine if men are from Mars and women are from Venus in their beliefs about love and romantic relationships // Sex Roles. 2002. Vol. 46. P. 131—147. DOI:10.1023/A:1019780801500
22. Toro-Morn M., Sprecher S. A cross-cultural comparison of mate preferences among university students: The United States Vs. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) // Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 2003. Vol. 34(2). P. 151—170.
23. Triandis H.C. Individualism-collectivism and personality // Journal of Personality. 2001. Vol. 69(6). P. 907—924. DOI:10.1111/1467-6494.696169
24. Wan W.N., Luk C.L., Lai J.C.L. Personality correlates of loving styles among Chinese students in Hong Kong // Personality and Individual Differences. 2000. Vol. 29. P. 169—175. DOI:10.1016/ S0191-8869(99)00185-3