Accuracy of Interpersonal Perception in Mediated Contacts in Social Media

The paper focuses on the issue of accuracy of interpersonal perception in computer-mediated communication. It shows how J.Biesanz’s social accuracy model of interpersonal perception may be used in explorations of interpersonal perception in mediated contacts — via personal webpages in social media. In the study the subjects (15 people) were asked to assess individuals with whom they were unacquainted basing on their webpages in VKontakte (30 web pages) using a brief version of the Big Five Inventory. The outcomes reveal which objective parameters of the assessed webpages contribute most to the accuracy of interpersonal perception in the subjects, and also prove that the accuracy of interpersonal perception in this case is shaped by its normative component, not by the distinctive one. This suggests that in virtual communication one’s perception of a partner may be more affected by stereotypes than in real communication — a hypothesis that needs to be further tested. The research was conducted with the assistance of the Russian Foundation for Humanities, project 14-06-00730 “Transformations of Higher Mental Functions in the Context of Information Society Development (A Cultural-Historical Approach)”.

1. Andreeva G.M. Psihologija social’nogo poznanija: uchebnoe posobiye dlia studentov vyscshih uchebnyh zavedeniy [Psychology of social knowledge: textbook for students of higher educational institutions]. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2000. 288 p. (In Russ.).
2. Andreeva G.M. Social’naja psihologija v prostranstve sovremennoj nauki i kul’tury [Social psychology in space of modern science and culture]. Psihologicheskie issledovanija [Psychological Studies]. 2013, V. 6, no 30, URL: http://psystudy.ru (Accessed: 02.09.2015). (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
3. Belinskaja E.P., Bronin I.D. Problema tochnosti mezhlichnostnogo vosprijatija: sovremennye konceptual’nye modeli i jempiricheskie issledovanija [The problem of accuracy in interpersonal perception: a theoretical and empirical study]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosuniversiteta [Bulletin of the Kemerovo state University], 2015, V. 1, no 1(61), pp. 109—114. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
4. Bronin I.D., Ivanova K.L. Psihometricheskie harakteristiki Kratkogo lichnostnogo oprosnika: pilotazhnoe issledovanie [Psychometric characteristics of the brief personal questionnaire: pilot study]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo foruma «Lomonosov-2014» [Proceedings of the international scientific forum “Lomonosov — 2014”]. Moscow: MAKS Press, 2014. (In Russ.). URL: http://lomonosov-msu.ru/ archive/Lomonosov_2014/2644/2200_69312_c910fa.pdf (Accessed: 21.11.2015).
5. Vojskunskij A.E. Social’naja percepcija v social’nyh setjah [Social perception on social networks]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Moscow state University], Ser. 14. Psihologija, 2014, no 2, pp. 90—104. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
6. Zhukov Ju. M. Problemy izmerenija tochnosti mezhlichnostnogo vosprijatija [The problem of measuring the accuracy of interpersonal perception]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Moscow state University]. Ser. 14. Psihologija, 1978, no 1, pp. 26—34. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
7. Obydenkova V.K. Mezhlichnostnoe vosprijatie v kontekste kibersocializacii cheloveka v social’nyh setjah internet-sredy [Interpersonal perception in the context of cybersocialization of the person social media Internet environment]. Sbornik dokladov V Mezhvuzovskoj konferencii molodyh uchenyh po rezul’tatam issledovanij v oblasti psihologii, pedagogiki, sociokul’turnoj antropologii [The collection of reports of V interuniversity conference of young scientists on the research results in the field of philosophy, pedagogy, socio-cultural anthropology]. Moscow: Izdatel’skij otdel Centra issledovatel’skih tehnologij REDU, 2012, pp. 400—404. (In Russ.).
8. Astrid S., Bernd M., Machilek F. Personality in Cyberspace: Personal Web Sites as Media for Personality Expressions and Impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006, Vol. 90, Issue 6, pp. 1014—1031. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.1014
9. Austin E., Gill A.J., Oberlander J. Rating E-mail Personality at Zero-Acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 2006, Vol. 40, Issue 3, pp. 497—507. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.027
10. Back M.D., Egloff B., Gaddis S., Gosling S.D., Stopfer J.M., Schmukle S.C., Vazire S. Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idelization. Psychological Science, 2010, Vol. 21, Issue 3, pp. 372—374. doi: 10.1177/0956797609360756.
11. Bates D., Bolker B., Maechler M.,Walker S. Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4. R Package version 1.1—7. 2015. URL: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ lme4/index.html (Accessed: 21.11.2015).
12. Berry D., Finch-Wero J.L. Accuracy in Face Perception: A View from Ecological Psychology. Journal of Personality, 1993, Vol. 61, pp. 497—520. doi: 10.1111/j.1467­6494.1993.tb00780.x
13. Biesanz J. The Social Accuracy Model of Interpersonal Perception: Assessing Individual Differences in Perceptive and Expressive Accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2010, Vol. 45, Issue 5, pp. 853—885. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2010.519262
14. Biesanz J.C., Chan M., Human L.J., Paquin A.-C., Parisotto K.L., Sarracino J. Do We Know When Our Impressions of Others Are Valid? Evidence for Realistic Accuracy Awareness in First Impressions of Personality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2011, Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 452—459. doi: 10.1177/1948550610397211
15. Gosling S., Ko S., Mannarelli T., Morris M. A Room with a Cue: Personality Judgments Based on Offices and Bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, Vol. 82, Issue 3, pp. 379—398. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.379
16. Gosling S.D., Rentfrow P., Swann W.A. Very Brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 2003, Vol. 37, Issue 6, pp. 504—528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
17. Gosling S., Vazire S. E-Perceptions: Personality Impressions Based On Personal Websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, Vol. 87, Issue 1, pp. 123—132. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.123
18. Kenny D., Baron R. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, Vol. 51, Issue 6, pp. 1173—1182. doi:10.1037/0022­3514.51.6.1173
19. Swann W.B. The Self and Identity Negotiation. Interaction Studies, 2005, Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 69—83. doi: 10.1075/is.6.1.06swa
20. Tenney E.R., Spellman B.A. Complex Social Consequences of Self-Knowledge. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2011, Vol. 2, Issue 4, pp. 343—350. doi: 10.1177/1948550610390965