Attitudes towards micro- and macrosocium in educators with different gravity of psychological burnout

1351

Abstract

The article describes the research aimed at investigation of psychological burnout symptoms and attitudes towards micro and macrosocium in educators in different severity of the burnout. The research hypothesis was that with the increase in psychological burnout level the impact of stress factors aggravates emotional, motivational, cognitive, behavioral and psychosomatic symptoms as well as a professional’s negative attitude towards micro and macrosocium and his/her profession in general. The sample included 155 educators from secondary schools: 112 women and 43 men aged from 22 to 70 years old. The methods included observation, interview, author’s questionnaire of psychological burnout symptoms, MBI questionnaire by K. Maslach and S. Jackson modified for educators and teachers by N.E. Vodopyanova. The research revealed that the increase in psychological burnout level the impact of stress factors aggravates emotional, motivational, cognitive, behavioral and psychosomatic symptoms. The educators with higher levels of psychological burnout demonstrate more negative attitude towards the profession and work environment, microsocium (students and colleagues) and macrosocium (social strata and public institutes).

General Information

Keywords: psychological burnout, emotional, motivational, cognitive, behavioral and psychosomatic symptoms of burnout, microsocium, macrosocium

Journal rubric: Social Psychology

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Merzlyakova D.R. Attitudes towards micro- and macrosocium in educators with different gravity of psychological burnout [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru], 2012. Vol. 4, no. 4 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Abramova G.S., Yudchic Yu.A. Psihologiya v medicine. M., 1998.
  2. Boiko V.V. Energiya emocii v obshenii: vzglyad na sebya i na drugih. M., 1996.
  3. Vodop'yanova N.E. Starchenkova E.S. Sindrom vygoraniya: diagnostika i profilaktika. SPb., 2005.
  4. Dem'yanchuk R.V. Emocional'noe vygoranie uchitelya. M., 2006.
  5. Orel V.E. Fenomen «vygoraniya» v zarubezhnoi psihologii: empiricheskie issledovaniya // Psihologicheskii zhurnal. 2001. T.22. ? 1.
  6. Sidorenko E.V. Metody matematicheskoi obrabotki v psihologii. SPb., 2002.
  7. Corey G. Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy: 3-d ed. Monterey, Calif., 1986.
  8. Freudenberger H.J. Staff burn-out // Journal of Social Issues. 1974. Vol. 30.http://psihotesti.ru/gloss/tag/cherstvost/
  9. Maslach C, Leiter M.P. The Truth about Burnout: How Organization Cause Personal Stress and What to Do about It. San Francisco, CA., 1997.
  10. Naisberg-Fennig S., Fennig S., Keinan G, Elizur A. Personality characteristics and proneness to burnout: a study among psychiatrists // Stress Medicine. 1991. Vol. 7.
  11. Schaufeli W.B., Enzmann D. The Burnout Companion to Study and Practice: A Critical Analysis. Washington DC, 1998.
  12. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva, 1992.

Information About the Authors

Dina R. Merzlyakova, PhD in Psychology, Head of the Department of Life Safety, Udmurt state University, Izhevsk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4825-3181, e-mail: dinamerzlyakova26@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 2043
Previous month: 3
Current month: 9

Downloads

Total: 1351
Previous month: 3
Current month: 0