Why workaholics are not Mozarts? Musical abilities in post-cognitive era

The paper is looking at recent publications on musical abilities suggesting the most promising trends for future research. Musical abilities and talent are the most revealing for the whole agenda of giftedness; therefore, it’s easier to see the most arguable points and accents characterizing scholarly discussion in abilities’ and talent discourse. In the first place, this discussion is the hardest addressing the idea of «deliberate practice» that is now declining but used to be very influential in the end of XXth — beginning of the XXI century. «Deliberate practice» had been invented to deny and reject the very notion of giftedness as an inborn psychological category. Secondly, contemporary psychology of musical giftedness and talent gives the leading role to motivation, inner need in music making and bio-evolutionary psychological resources at the expense of more traditional cognitive abilities like pitch, rhythm and musical memory. The author argues that motivational and emotionally based factors are the clue to the concept of musical talent and creativity. Summarizing contemporary psychology of music research, the author joins the nativist approach to musical abilities’ discourse and suggests finding the new foundation for musical talent’s development beyond cognitive resources of human mind and its traditionally accepted measurements.

1. Kabalevskii D.B. Muzyka i muzykal'noe vospitanie [Music and musical education]. Moscow: Znanie, 1984. 64 p. (In Russ.)
2. Tarasova K.V. Ontogenez muzykal'nykh sposobnostei [Ontogeny of musical abilities]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1988. 173 p. (In Russ.)
3. Teplov B.M. Psikhologiya muzykal'nykh sposobnostei [Psychology of musical ability]. Moscow; Leningrad: APN RSFSR, 1947. 355 p. (In Russ.)
4. Comeau G. et al. Can you tell a prodigy from a professional musician? Music Perception, 2017. Vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 200–209. DOI:10.1525/mp.2017.35.2.200
5. Carroll J. Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press, 1993. 819 p. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511571312
6. Hallam S. et al. Changes in motivation as expertise develops: relationship with musical aspirations. Musicae Scientiae, 2016. Vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 528–550. DOI:10.1177/1029864916634420
7. Ericsson K.A., Krampe R.Th., Tesch-Romer C. The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance. Psychological Review, 1993. Vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 363–406. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
8. Fitch W.T. Four principles of bio-musicology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 2015. Vol. 370, article ID 20140091, 12 p. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2014.0091
9. Fitch W.T. Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: distinguishing meter and pulse perception. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2013. Vol. 7, article ID 68, 16 p. DOI:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00068
10. Gagné F. Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 2004. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 119–147. DOI:10.1080/1359813042000314682
11. Gagné F. Understanding the complex choreography of talent development through DMGT-Based analysis. In Heller K.A., Monks F.J., Subotnik R.F., Sternberg R.J. (eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent. Oxford: Elsevier, 2000, pp. 67–79. DOI:10.1016/B978-008043796-5/50005-X
12. Howe M.J.A., Davidson J.W., Sloboda J.A. Innate talents: reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1998. Vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 399–407. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X9800123X
13. McPherson G. Diary of a child musical prodigy [Elektronnyi resurs]. In Williamon A., Coimbra D. (eds.), Proceedings of the national symposium of performance science. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Association Européenne des Conservatoires, 2007, pp. 213–218. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237548737_Diary_of_a_child_musical_prodigy (Accessed 07.12.2021).
14. Peretz I., Zatorre R. Brain organization for music processing. Annual Review of Psychology, 2005. Vol. 56, pp. 89–114. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070225
15. Pfordresher P., Demorest S. The prevalence and correlates of accurate singing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 2021. Vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 5–23. DOI:10.1177/0022429420951630
16. Swaminathan S., Kragness H., Schellenberg E. The musical ear test: norms and correlates from a large sample of Canadian undergraduates. Behavior Research Methods, 2021. Vol. 53. 18 p. DOI:10.3758/s13428-020-01528-8
17. The child as musician: A handbook of musical development. McPherson G. (ed.) Oxford University Press, 2006. 528 p. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198744443.001.0001
18. Trehub S. Musical predispositions in infancy. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 2006. Vol. 930, no. 1, pp. 1–16. DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05721.x
19. Trehub S., Cirelli L. Precursors to the performing arts in infance and early childhood. Progress in Brain Research, 2018. Vol. 237, pp. 225–242. DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.008
20. Trehub S.E., Hannon E.E. Infant music perception: domain-general or domain-specific mechanisms? Cognition, 2006. Vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 73–99. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.006
21. Ullén F., Hambrick D., Mosing M. Rethinking expertise: A multifactorial gene–environment interaction model of expert performance. Psychological Bulletin, 2016. Vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 427–446. DOI:10.1037/bul0000033
22. Winner E. Gifted children: myths and realities [Elektronnyi resurs]. NY: Basic Books, 1996. 464 p. URL: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-97810-000 (Accessed 07.12.2021).
23. Winner E., Martino G. Giftedness in non-academic domains: the case of visual arts and music. In Heller K.A. et al. (eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, 2000, pp. 95–110. DOI:10.1016/B978-008043796-5/50007-3
24. Honing H. et al. Without it no music: cognition, biology and evolution of musicality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences, 2015. Vol. 370, no. 1664, article ID 20140088, 8 p. DOI:10.1098/rstb.2014.0088