Ethnic face categorization by Russians and Tuvinians in discrimination tasks

The opposite tendencies towards blurring the boundaries of compact living of ethnic groups and of relocation of large groups of strangers into the territories of compact residence of local groups generate a number of specific phenomena connected with the inter-group perception. We conducted a comparative study of perception and communication of transition series of “ethnic faces” among two small-scale isolated populations and representatives of the corresponding ethnic groups in multi-ethnic cities. The participants were to solve two discrimination task, one individually, the AB=X task, the other one, the dual “same-different” task, in dyads. For all samples of subjects, of In the AB=X task, the maximum discrimination efficiency was recorded for the same no. 2—3 pair of transition images series This may indicate that all subjects relied on the morphological features stimulus faces than on anything else. Also a tendency is observed toward similarity in the dynamics of efficiency of task performance in different groups of subjects, with the exception of the sample of Russians from the metropolis. At the same time, in the dyadic experiment, subjects from megacities demonstrate different trends in terms of the maximum efficiency of task performance. The sample of Russian subjects from Moscow demonstrates a significantly smaller decrease in efficiency when approaching the edges of the transitional series of stimulus images in the AB=X task, but not in the dual task. This is probably due to different nature of the tasks, i.e. one may easily suppose a more developed ability to perceptually discriminate between ethnic faces resulting from their greater variety in the environment, as in Moscow megacity, whereas it does not seem reasonable to suppose difference in communication skills required to perform the dual task across the samples.

1. Ananyeva K.I., Basyul I.A., Tovuu N.O., Kharitonov A.N. Pertseptivnaya kategorizatsiya v interpretatsii rezul’tatov parnogo eksperimenta po identifikatsii lits raznykh ras [Perceptual categorization in the interpretation of the results of a pair experiment to identify people of different races] / Psikhologicheskiye i psikhoanaliticheskiye issledovaniya 2015—2016 [Psychological and psychoanalytic studies 2015—2016] / Pod red. A.A. Demidov. — M.: Moskovskiy institut psikhoanaliza, 2016. P. 226—235. (In Russ)
2. Ananyeva K.I., Basyul I.A., Kharitonov A.N. Izostaticheskiye okulomotornyye patterny pri zritel’nom vospriyatii lits svoyey i drugoy rasy [Isostatic oculomotor patterns in the visual perception of the faces of the self’s and the other’s race] // Eksperimental’naâ psihologiâ [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2017. V. 10. № 4. P. 133—147. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2017100409 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
3. Ananyeva K.I., Kharitonov A.N. Izobrazheniye i zvuchashchiy tekst v zadache identifikatsii lits predstaviteley raznykh ras [Image and sounding text in the task of identifying faces of representatives of different races] // Litso cheloveka v prostranstve obshcheniya [Human face in the communication space] / Otv. red. K.I. Ananyeva, V.A. Barabanschikov, A.A. Demidov. M.: Moskovskiy institut psikhoanaliza-Kogito-Tsentr, 2016. P. 13—23.
4. Ananyeva K.I., Kharitonov A.N., Barminov I.A., Zhegallo A.V. Effekt kategorial’nosti vospriyatiya pri raspoznanii usrednennykh lits yevropeoidnogo i mongoloidnogo tipov [The effect of categorization of perception in recognizing averaged persons of the Caucasian and Mongoloid type] / Druzhininskiye chteniya: materialy XIV Vseros. nauch-prakt. konf., g. Sochi, 21—23 maya 2015 [Druzhinin’s readings: materials of the XIV All-Russian. scientific and practical. Conf., Sochi, May 21—23, 2015] / pod red. I.B. Shuvanova, S.V. Voronina, V.P. Shuvanovoy, S.A. Baranovoy. Sochi: RITS FGBOU VPO «SGU», 2015. P. 67—70.
5. Ananyeva K.I., Nosulenko V.N., Samoylenko E.S., Kharitonov A.N. Kognitivno-kommunikativnaya paradigma B.F. Lomova: Sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy [The cognitive-communicative paradigm of B.F. Lomov: Current status and prospects] // Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal]. 2017. V. 38. № 6. P. 17—29. (In Russ)
6. Ananyeva K.I., Zhegallo A.V. Osobennosti razlicheniya lits raznykh ras v mikrointervalakh vremeni [Differentiation of different race face in micro time intervals] // Eksperimental’naâ psihologiâ [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2019. V. 12, №. 3, P. 63—72. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2019120305 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
7. Barabanschikov V.A., Lupenko E.A., Shunto A.S. Vospriyatiye lichnosti cheloveka po izobrazheniyam yego litsa na fotografii i khudozhestvennom portrete [Perception of the identity of the person depicted in the photo and in the portrait of the face] // Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2017. V. 10. № 4. P. 56—73. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2017100405 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
8. Basyul I.A., Demidov A.A., Diveyev D.A. Zakonomernosti okulomotornoy aktivnosti predstaviteley russkogo i tuvinskogo etnosov pri otsenke pertseptivnogo doveriya po vyrazheniyam lits [Regularities of oculomotor activity of Russians and Tuvans in the assessment of perceptual confidence by facial expressions] // Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2017. V. 10. № 4. P. 148—162. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2017100410 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
9. Basyul I.A., Demidov A.A., Diveyev D.A. Izostaticheskiye okulomotornyye patterny pri otsenke pertseptivnogo doveriya po vyrazheniyam lits // Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2018. T. 11. №. 4. S. 70—78. doi: 10.17759/exppsy.2018110406 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
10. Caldara R., Rossion B., Bovet P., Hauert C.A. Event-related potentials and time course of the ‘‘other-race’’ face classification advantage // Neuroreport. 2004. V. 15. № 5. P. 905—910.
11. Chance J., Turner A., Goldstein A. Development of differential recognition for own-and other-race faces // Journal of Psychology, 1982. V. 112, № 1. P. 29—37.
12. Etcoff N.L., Magee, J.J. Categorical perception of facial expressions. // Cognition, 1992, 44, P. 281—295.
13. Kharitonov A.N., Ananyeva K.I. Raspoznavaniye litsa i effekt «drugoy rasy» [Face recognition and the other race effec] / Litso cheloveka kak sredstvo obshcheniya: mezhdistsiplinarnyy podkhod [Human face as a means of communication: an interdisciplinary approach] // Otv. red. V.A. Barabanshhikov, A.A. Demidov, D.A. Diveev. M.: Kogito-Tsentr; Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2012. p. 145—160. (In Russ.)
14. Kharitonov A.N., Ananyeva K.I., Basyul I.A. Pertseptivnaya kategorizatsiya lits raznykh ras v individual’nom i parnom eksperimente [Perceptual categorization of persons of different races in an individual and paired experiment] // Fundamental’nyye i prikladnyye issledovaniya sovremennoy psikhologii: rezul’taty i perspektivy razvitiya [Fundamental and applied research of modern psychology: results and development prospects] / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlov, V.A. Koltsova. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2017. P. 582—589. (In Russ.)
15. Kharitonov A.N., Ananyeva K.I., Basyul I.A. Strategii referentsii v dialogakh ob etnicheskikh litsakh: toposemanticheskiy ekspress-analiz [Reference strategies in dialogues about ethnic faces: a toposemantic express-analysis] // Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2018. V. 11. №. 4. P. 125—134. doi: 10.17759/exppsy (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
16. Kholodnaya M.A. Kognitivnyye stili: O prirode individual’nogo uma [Cognitive styles: On the nature of the individual mind] SPb.: Piter, 2004. (In Russ.)
17. Korolkova O.A., Zhegallo A.V. Effekt kategorial’nosti vospriyatiya ekspressiy litsa: mnogoobraziye proyavleniy [The effect of categorical perception of facial expressions: the diversity of manifestations] // Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2012. V. 5. № 2. P. 22—38. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
18. Kun K.S. Rasy Yevropy [Europian Races]. M.: AST, Astrel’, 2011. (In Russ.)
19. Levin D. Race as a visual future: using Visual Search and Perceptual Discrimination Tasks to Understand Face Categories ant the Cross-Race Recognition Deficit // Journal of experimental Psychology, 2000.V. 129. № 4. P. 559—574.
20. Liberman A. M., Harris K.S., Hoffman H.S., Griffith B.C. The Discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. // Journal of experimental psychology, 1957, Vol. 54, № 5, P. 358—368.
21. Lingyun Z., Tong M.H., Cottrell G.W. Information Attracts Attention: A Probabilistic Account of the Cross-Race Advantage in Visual Search / Proc. 29th Ann. Cognitive Science Conf., 2007. P. 749—754.
22. Lupenko E.A. Mezhkul’turnyye razlichiya v opisanii i opoznanii lits svoyey i chuzhoy etnicheskoy prinadlezhnosti na primere portretnykh izobrazheniy [Intercultural differences in the description and identification of persons of their own and someone else’s ethnicity on the example of portrait images] // Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology (Russia)], 2018. V. 11. №. 4. P. 116—124. doi: 10.17759/exppsy.2018110410 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
23. Malpass R.S., Kravitz J. Recognition for faces of own and other race / Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969. V. 13, No. 4. P. 330—334.
24. Meissner C.A., Brigham J.C. Thirty Years of InvestigatingThe Own-Race Bias in Memory for Faces: A Meta-Analytic Review // Psychology, Public Policy, and Law Copyright. 2001. V. 7. № 1. P. 3—35. doi: 10.1037//1076-8971.7.1.3
25. Rogers L. Sensory Panel Management: A Practical Handbook for Recruitment, Training and Performance. UK: Woodhead Publishin, 2017.
26. Shepard J. Social factors in face recognition / Perceiving and remembering faces. G. Davies, H. Ellis and J. Shepard (Eds.). London: Academic Press, 1981. P. 55—79.
27. Shvets T.A. Sub”yektivnoye vospriyatiye vozrasta mladshimi podrostkami: kross-kul’turnoye issledovaniye [Subjective perception of age by younger adolescents: a cross-cultural study] // Aktual’nyye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya [Actual problems of psychological knowledge]. 2017. V. 44. № 3. O. 74—89. (In Russ.)
28. Valentine T., Chiroro P., Dixon R. An account of the own-race bias and the contact hypothesis based on a “face space” model of face recognition // Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition: Explorations in face space / T. Valentine (Ed.). London: Routledge, 1995. P. 69—94.