Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2019. Vol. 12, no. 3, 73–91
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2019120306
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)
Individual differences in perception of similarity of facial images and characteristics of oculomotor activity
Abstract
General Information
Keywords: comparison, subjective evaluation of similarity, individual differences, eye tracker, oculomotor activity
Journal rubric: Face Science
Article type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2019120306
Funding. The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 16-06-01100 “Regularities of formation and transmission of a perceptual image in the process of communication: a cross-cultural aspect.”
For citation: Samoylenko E.S., Basiul I.A. Individual differences in perception of similarity of facial images and characteristics of oculomotor activity. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2019. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 73–91. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2019120306. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
References
- Ananyeva K.I., Basul I.A., Kharitonov A.N. Izostaticheskie phiksatsionnye pattern pri zritelnom vospriyatii lits svoej I drugoj rasy // Eksperimentalnaya psychologiya. 2017. T. 10. № 4.
- Barabanschikov V.A., Jegallo A.V. Aitreking: Metody registratsii dvijenij glaz i vzora cheloveka. Moskva: Institut psykhologii RAN, 2013.
- Bruner G. Psykhologiya poznaniya. Moskva: Progrss, 1977.
- Jegallo A.V. Spetsifika soderjaniya zritelnykh fiksatsij pri opoznanii emotsionalnykh ekspressij po vyrajeniyu litsa // Aitreking v psykhologitcheskoj nauke i praktike. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2016. S. 240—255.
- Samoylenko E.S. Protsess sravneniya v systemakh poznaniya, obscheniya I lichnosti. Dissert. Dokt. psykchol. nauk. M., 2012. 523 s.
- Samoylenko E.S., Melkumyan T.A. Individualnye razlichiya v protsessakh predmetno-orientirovannogo sravneniya // Eksperimentalnaya psykhologiya. 2014. T.7. #4. P. 83—99.
- Samoylenko E.S., Melkumyan T.A. Individualnye razlitchiya v protsessakh predmetno-orientirovannogo sravneniya // Eksperimentalnaya Psykhologiya. 2014. T. 7. № 4. S. 83—99.
- Bassok M., Medin D.L. Birds of a feather flock together: Similarity judgments with semantically rich stimuli // Journal of Memory and Language. 1997. V. 36. Р. 311—336.
- Estes Z., Hasson U. The importance of being nonalignable: A critical test of the structural alignment theory of similarity // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2004. V. 30. Р. 1082—1092.
- Golonka S., Estes Z. Thematic Relations Affect Similarity Via Commonalities // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2009. V. 35. №6. P. 1454—1464.
- Landis D., Silver C.A., Jones J.M., & Messick S. Level of proficiency and multidimensional viewpoints about problem similarity // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1967. V. 51. P. 216—222.
- O’Hare D. Individual differences in perceived similarity and preference for visual art: A multidimensional scaling analysis // Perception & Psychophysics. 1976. V. 20. № 6. P. 445—452.
- R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org/.
- Simmons S., Estes Z. Individual differences in the perception of similarity and difference // Cognition. 2008. V. 108. Р. 781—795.
- Tversky A. Features of similarity // Psychological Review. 1977. V. 84. P. 327—352.
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Views
Total: 753
Previous month: 23
Current month: 11
Downloads
Total: 273
Previous month: 7
Current month: 2