Skip to Main Content

Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2018. Vol. 11, no. 2, 34–49
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2018110203
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)

Development and Approbation of The Russian Database of Neutral and Smiling Female Faces (RuNeS Faces)

849

N.V. Moroshkina, I.I. Ivanchei, R.V. Tikhonov, A.D. Karpov, I.V. Ovchinnikova

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The article presents a database of women’s faces for research in the field of social perception. Each of 55 models was photographed full-face under four conditions: with a neutral or smiling face with hair up or down. The database includes the results of facial morphometry (relative positions of homologous points), expert ratings of appearance style, scores of perceived intelligence and attractiveness. The peculiarity of the database is that, unlike the others, we preserved the natural style featured on the models: clothes, jewelry, and makeup. The database was approbated in the study of physiognomic and appearance style predictors of perceived intelligence and attractiveness. It expands the variety of stimulus images available for researchers and can be used in different studies of social perception.

General Information

Keywords: social perception, face perception, facial morphometry, image database, attractiveness, perceived intelligence

Journal rubric: Psychology of States

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2018110203

For citation: Moroshkina N.V., Ivanchei I.I., Tikhonov R.V., Karpov A.D., Ovchinnikova I.V. Development and Approbation of The Russian Database of Neutral and Smiling Female Faces (RuNeS Faces). Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2018. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 34–49. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2018110203. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Adams D.C., Otarola-Castillo E. Geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2013, no. 4, pp. 393—399. doi:10.1111/2041- 210X.12035
  2. Ageev V.S. Vliyanie faktorov kul’tury na vospriyatie i otsenku cheloveka chelovekom [The effect of cultural factors on the perception and evaluation of one person by another]. Voprosy psikhologii [Issues of Psychology], 1985, no. 3, pp. 135—140. (In Russ.).
  3. Anan’eva K.I. Identifikatsiya i otsenka lits raznoi rasovoi prinadlezhnostiyu. Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Identification and evaluation of faces of different races. Abstract of Cand. Psych. Sci. thesis]. Moscow, 2009. 24 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Barabanshchikov V.A., Mainina I.N. Otsenka «glubinnykh» individual’no-psikhologicheskikh osobennostei cheloveka po fotoizobrazheniyu ego litsa [Evaluation of «depth» individual psychological characteristics by facial photographs]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental psychology (Russia)], 2010, no. 4, pp. 50-71. (In Russ.).
  5. Dalrymple K.A., Gomez J., Duchaine B. The Dartmouth database of children’s faces: Acquisition and validation of a new face stimulus set. PLoS ONE, 2013, vol. 8, no. 11, e79131. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0079131
  6. Diveev D.A., Khoze E.G. Sovremennye tekhnologii transformatsii izobrazhenii v izuchenii vospriyatiya cheloveka po vyrazheniyu ego litsa [Modern Technological Image Transformation in the Study of Perception of Facial Expression of a Person]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental psychology (Russia)], 2009, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 101—110. (In Russ.).
  7. Eagly A.H., Ashmore R.D., Makhijani M.G., Longo L.C. What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 1991, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 109—128. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
  8. Ebner N.C., Riediger M., Lindenberger U. FACES — A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation. Behavior research methods, 2010, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 351—362. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.351
  9. Fink B., Penton-Voak I. Evolutionary psychology of facial Attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2002, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 154—158. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00190
  10. Gershkovich V.A. Vliyanie dezinformatsii na vospominanie o sdelannom vybore [Influence of dissemination of false information on the recollection of the choices made]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo gumanitarnogo nauchnogo fonda [Bulletin of the Russian Humanitarian Scientific Fund]. 2015, no. 79, pp. 208—217. (In Russ.).
  11. Hill T., Lewicki P., Czyzewska, Schuller G. The role of learned inferential encoding rules in the perception of faces: Effects of nonconscious self-perpetuation of a bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1990, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 350—371. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(90)90044-M
  12. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M. M. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 1997, no. 17, pp. 4302-4311.
  13. Karpov A.D., Moroshkina N.V. Rol’ implitsitnogo naucheniya pri otsenke psikhologicheskikh kachestv drugogo cheloveka po ego fotoizobrazheniyu [The role of implicit learning in evaluating the psychological qualities of another person by photo image]. In Anan’eva K.I., Barabanshchikov V.A. (Eds.), Litso cheloveka v nauke, iskusstve i praktike [Human face in science, art and practice]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2014, pp. 93—106. (In Russ.).
  14. Kleisner K., Chvátalová V., Flegr J. Perceived intelligence is associated with measured intelligence in men but not women. PLoS ONE, 2014, vol. 9, no. 3, e81237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081237
  15. Klucharev V., Hytönen K., Rijpkema M., Smidts A., Fernández G. Reinforcement learning signal predicts social conformity. Neuron, 2009, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 140—151. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.027
  16. Ma D.S., Correll J., Wittenbrink B. The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior research methods, 2015, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1122—1135. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
  17. Mesko N., Bereczkei T. Hairstyle as an adaptive means of displaying phenotypic quality. Human Nature: An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 2004, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 251.
  18. Moore F.R., Filippou D., Perrett D.I. Intelligence and attractiveness in the face: beyond the attractiveness halo effect. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 2011, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 205—217. doi: 10.1556/JEP.9.2011.3.2
  19. Moroshkina N.V., Karpov A.D. Rol’ kognitivnogo stilya «impul’sivnost’-refleksivnost’» v implitsitnom nauchenii (na primere zadach sotsial’noi pertseptsii) [The role of cognitive style of impulsivity-reflexivity in implicit learning (the example of the social perception tasks)]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental psychology (Russia)], 2015, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 61—76. (In Russ.). doi:10.17759/exppsy.2015080405
  20. Peirce J. W. PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python. Journal of neuroscience methods, 2007, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 8—13. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
  21. Penton-Voak I.S., Pound N., Little A.C., Perrett D.I. Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a “kernel of truth” in social perception. Social Cognition, 2006, no. 24, pp. 607—640. doi: 10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.607
  22. Rohlf J.F. TpsRelw (version 1.46): [software]. New York: department of ecology and evolution, 2008. State University of New York at Stony Brook.
  23. Sergent J., Ohta S., MacDonald B. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing A positron emission tomography study. Brain, 1992, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 15—36. doi: 10.1093/brain/115.1.15
  24. Todorov A., Dotsch R., Porter J.M., Oosterhof N.N., Falvello V.B. Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion, 2013, no. 13, pp. 724—738.
  25. Willis J., Todorov A. First impressions making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 2006, no. 17, pp. 592-598. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
  26. Zaki J., Schirmer J., Mitchell J. P. Social influence modulates the neural computation of value. Psychological Science, 2011, no. 22, pp. 894—900. doi: 10.1177/0956797611411057

Information About the Authors

Nadezhda V. Moroshkina, PhD in Psychology, Senior Researcher, Cognitive Research Laboratory, St. Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: moroshkina.n@gmail.com

Ivan I. Ivanchei, PhD in Psychology, Researcher of the Laboratory of Cognitive Research, Department of Psychology, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Researcher of the Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University (Ghent, Belgium), Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8716-8575, e-mail: i.ivanchei@spbu.ru

Roman V. Tikhonov, PhD in Psychology, Junior Researcher, Laboratory for Cognitive Studies, Saint Petersburg State University, Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Sociology in Education and Science, HSE University — Saint Petersburg, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1884-1903, e-mail: roman.tikhonov@me.com

Anatoly D. Karpov, Junior Research Associate, Department of General Psychology, Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: anatoly1804@gmail.com

Irina V. Ovchinnikova, Junior Research Fellow, Laboratory of Translational Sciences of Human Development, Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5950-5765, e-mail: ovchinir@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 1939
Previous month: 19
Current month: 9

Downloads

Total: 849
Previous month: 5
Current month: 1