Skip to Main Content

Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2008. Vol. 1, no. 1, 34–44
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)

Role of Semantics in Sound Fragments Duration Reproduction

923

V.A. Sadov, N.G. Shpagonova

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

Results of experimental research on perception features of natural, reverse, and conventional psychophysical signals are presented. A six)scale method of semantic differential was developed for describing sound fragments. It was shown that latent variables determining description of natural and artificial sound fragments are identical. Results indicate correlations between sound fragment descriptions and mistaken reproduction of their duration.

General Information

Keywords: time perception, semantic differential, sound signals

Journal rubric: Psychophysiology

For citation: Sadov V.A., Shpagonova N.G. Role of Semantics in Sound Fragments Duration Reproduction. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2008. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 34–44. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Anastazi A. Psihologicheskoe testirovanie: V 2 t. (Psychological tests. In 2 vol.) M.: Pedagogika, 1982.
  2. Gusev A.N., Mihalevskaja M.B., Izmajlov Ch.A. Izmerenie v psihologii. (Measurement in Psychology) M.: UMK «Psihologija», 2005.
  3. Epifanov E.G. Akusticheskaja sreda v sisteme sensorno-motornoj reguljacii (Acoustic environment in sensorimotor regulation system) // Problemy jekologicheskoj psihoakustiki. (Issues of ecological psychoacoustics) M.: Izd-vo IP RAN, 1991. S. 89–117.
  4. Lisenkova V. P., Shpagonova N. G. Individual'nye i vozrastnye osobennosti vosprijatija vremeni (na primere detskoj, podrostkovoj i junosheskoj vyborok) (Individual and age specific features of time perception: based on children, adolescents and youth samples) // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. (Psychological journal) 2006. T. 27. № 3. S. 49–57.
  5. Nosulenko V. N. Psihologija sluhovogo vosprijatija. (Psychology of audial perception) M.: Nauka, 1988.
  6. Sadov V.A., Shpagonova N.G. Ocenka i vosproizvedenie dlitel'nosti estestvennyh i iskazhennyh zvuchanij (Estimation and reproduction of natural and distorted sounds duration) // Ezhegodnik RPO. Materialy III Vserossijskogo s'ezda psihologov. (RPS annual. III All-Russia Psychological Congress Proceedings) SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU, 2003. T. 7.  S.19–22.
  7. Sadov V.A., Shpagonova N.G. Jekologicheskij podhod v issledovanii vosprijatija vremeni (Ecological approach to time perception research) // Trudy Vtoroj Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii po kognitivnoj nauke. (Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Cognitive Science) SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU, 2006. T. 2. S. 417–418.
  8. Sadov V.A., Shpagonova N.G. Rol' semantiki v vosprijatii dlitel'nostej estestvennyh i psihofizicheskih signalov (Role of semantics in perception of natural and psychophysical signals duration) // Psihofizika segodnja. (Psychophysics today) M.: Izd-vo IP RAN, 2007. S. 297–303.
  9. Fress P., Piazhe Zh. Vosprijatie i ocenka vremeni (Time perception and estimation) // Jeksperimental'naja psihologija. (Experimental psychology) M.: Progress, 1978.  Vyp. VI.
  10. Shiffman H.R. Vosprijatie vremeni (Time perception) // Oshushenie i vosprijatie. (Sensation and perception) 5-e izd. SPb.: Piter, 2003.
  11. Bella S.D., Pekets, Aronoff N. Time course of melody recognition: a gating paradigm study // Perception & Psychophysics. 2003. V. 65. P. 1019–1028.
  12. Fortin C.  & Breton R.  Temporal interval production and processing in working memory // Perception & Psychophysics. 1995. P. 203–215.
  13. Sadov V.A. Two Approaches to Study of the Perception of Time // Time, personality, memory. Ed. N.N. Korzh. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology. 1993. V. 31. № 5.  P. 21–33.
  14. Schaefer F. The effect of system response time on temporal predictability of work flow in human-computer // Human Performance. 1990. V. 3. P. 173–186.
  15. Tresilian J.R. Perceptual and cognitive process in time-to-contact estimation: Analisys of prediction-motion and relative judgment task // Perception & Psychophysics. 1995. V.57.  P. 231–245.

Information About the Authors

Vasiliy A. Sadov, PhD in Psychology, Associate professor, State University of Humanities, Moscow, Russia

Natalya G. Shpagonova, PhD in Psychology, Senior research associate, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IP RAS), Moscow, Russia, e-mail: shpagonova@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 4366
Previous month: 4
Current month: 6

Downloads

Total: 923
Previous month: 4
Current month: 0