Types of Catharsis in the Perception of Paintings

1070

Abstract

The article analyzes the functions and structure of psychological catharsis as a cultural means of meaning-making. Basing on eudemonistic understanding of catharsis, the authors show its meaning-making action. In the structure of catharsis, there are phases of excitement (pathos), concentration (‘merging’ with the main character), and transcendence (‘reaching beyond one’s limitations’) which, through personal reflection, concludes with the individual’s ‘return to oneself’, transformed through the encounter with the work of art. The authors consider catharsis as an event that encourages action and creates the space of opportunities for it; basing on the research of art historians, the authors describe two kinds of catharsis (in the perception of Caravaggio’s and Rembrandt’s works). The authors identify psychotechnical means of interrupting catharsis at the moment of emotional extremum (in the works of Caravaggio) and the conditions for completing the reflective catharsis with the ‘return to one’s transformed self’ (using the paintings of Rembrandt as an example). The paper concludes with an outline of further prospects of exploring catharsis as a cultural means of meaning-making.

General Information

Keywords: catharsis, eudemonistic interpretation, phases, psychotechnical means, paintings

Journal rubric: Interviews and Essays

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150313

For citation: Ermolaeva M.V., Lubovsky D.V. Types of Catharsis in the Perception of Paintings. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2019. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 125–132. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2019150313. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bakhtin M.M. Sobranie sochinenii: v 7 t. T. 1. [Collected Works: in 7 vol. Vol. 1]. Filosofskaya estetika 1920- kh g. [Philosophical aesthetics of the 1920s]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur; Russkie slovari Publ., 2003. 960 p.
  2. Bugarcheva E.A. Katarsis kak kategoriya i fenomen sovremennoi zhizni: Monografiya. [Catharsis as a category and phenomenon of modern life]. Kazan’: KGTU Publ., 2011. 121 p.
  3. Vasilyuk F.E. Psikhotekhnika vybora [Psychotechnics of choice]. In Leontiev D.A. (eds.), Psikhologiya s chelovecheskim litsom: gumanisticheskaya perspektiva v postsovetskoi psikhologii [ Psychology with a human face. Humanistic perspective in post-Soviet psychology]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 1997, pp. 284—314.
  4. Volkova P. Most cherez bezdnu: Kn. 1 [The bridge across the abyss. Book 1]. Moscow: Zebra E Publ., 2013. 255 p.
  5. Vygotskii L.S. Psikhologiya iskusstva [The psychology of art]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1968. 568 p.
  6. Dmitrieva N.A Kratkaya istoriya iskusstv [A brief history of art]. Issue 2. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1991. 318 p.
  7. Ermolaeva M.V. Sub”ektnyi podkhod v psikhologii razvitiya vzroslogo cheloveka [The subject-centered approach in developmental psychology of adult person]. Moscow:Publ. Moskovskogo psikhologo-sotsial’nogo instituta; Voronezh, NPO «MODEK» Publ. 2006. 200 p.
  8. Ermolaeva M.V., Lubovskii D.V. O znachenii iskusstva v kontekste razvitiya vzroslogo cheloveka [On the importance of art in the context of adult development]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [ Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2013, no. 3, pp. 38—46. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  9. Ermolaeva M.V., Lubovskii D.V. Ponyatie vstrechi v psikhoterapii i psikhologii razvitiya [The concept of encounter in psychotherapy and developmental psychology] Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2015, no. 3, pp. 105—116. doi:10.17759/cpp.2015230308
  10. Ermolaeva M.V., Lubovskii D.V. Kul’turno-psikhologicheskie modeli perezhivaniya lichnost’yu vstrechi s proizvedeniem iskusstva [Cultural and psychological models of personal experience of encounter with an artwork] Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [ Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2017, no. 2, pp. 159—174. doi:10.17759/cpp.2017250210
  11. Ermolaeva M.V., Lubovskii D.V. Psikhoterapevticheskoe znachenie katarsisa tragicheskogo [Psychotherapeutic value of tragic catharsis]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [ Counseling psychology and psychotherapy], 2018, no.1, pp. 35—52. doi:10.17759/ cpp.2018260103
  12. Zinchenko V.P. Tolerantnost’ k neopredelennosti: novost’ ili psikhologicheskaya traditsiya? [Tolerance to uncertainty: the news or a psychological tradition?]. In A.K. Bolotova (ed), Chelovek v situatsii neopredelennosti [A person in a situation of uncertainty. The Collection of materials of scientific-practical conference]. Moscow: TEIS Publ., 2007, pp. 9—33.
  13. Zinchenko V.P. Soznanie i tvorcheskii akt [Consciousness and the creative act]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur Publ., 2010. 592 p.
  14. Zinchenko V.P., Pruzhinin B.I., Shchedrina T.G. Istoki kul’turno-istoricheskoi psikhologii: filosofsko-gumanitarnyi kontekst [Origins of cultural-historical psychology: philosophical and humanitarian context]. Moscow: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN) Publ., 2010. 415 p.
  15. Zinchenko V.P. Vospriyatie i vizual’naya kul’tura [The perception and visual culture]. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: TsGI Print Publ., 2017. 599 p.
  16. Ivanov Vyacheslav. Dionis i pradionisiistvo: fragmenty knigi [Dionysus and Pre-Dionysian. Parts of the book]. Eschil. Tragedii [Aeschylus. Tragedies]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1989, pp. 351—452.
  17. Kantor M.K. Chertopolokh. Filosofiya zhivopisi [Thistle. Philosophy of painting]. Moscow: AST Publ., 2016. 480 p.
  18. Leont’ev D.A., et al. Psikhologiya vybora [Psychology of choice]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 2015. 464 p.
  19. Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoi estetiki. Tom IV. Aristotel’ i pozdnyaya klassika [The history of ancient aesthetics. Vol. 4. Aristotle and the late classics]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1975. 672 p.
  20. Martsinkovskaya T.D. Esteticheskaya paradigma v sovremennoi psikhologii: garmonizatsiya perezhivanii vremeni i prostranstva [Aesthetic paradigm in modern psychology: harmonization of experiences of time and space]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of psychology], 2015, no. 6, pp. 47—57.
  21. Pereyaslova M. O. Katarsicheskoe nachalo v russkoi proze kontsa XIX—XX vekov: na materiale proizvedenii A.P. Chekhova i G. Gazdanova: Dis. kand. filolog. nauk. [Cathartic inception in the Russian prose of the late XIX — early XX century: on the material of works by A. P. Chekhov and G. Gazdanov. Ph.D. (Philology) diss.]. Moscow, 2012. 195 p.
  22. Rubinshtein S.L. Chelovek i mir [A person and the world]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2012. 224 p.
  23. Sokolova E.T. Klinicheskaya psikhologiya utraty Ya [Clinical psychology of loss of the Self]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 2015. 895 р.
  24. Edinger E.F. Ego i arkhetip: Individuatsiya i religioznaya funktsiya psikhicheskogo [Ego and archetype: individuation and religious function of psychic]. Moscow: Penta Grafik Publ., 2000. 264 p.

Information About the Authors

Marina V. Ermolaeva, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor of the UNESCO Department “Cultural and historical psychology of childhood”, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-5136, e-mail: mar-erm@mail.ru

Dmitry V. Lubovsky, PhD in Psychology, associate professor, Professor of the UNESCO Department “Cultural and Historical Psychology of Childhood”, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-4667, e-mail: lubovsky@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 2001
Previous month: 82
Current month: 87

Downloads

Total: 1070
Previous month: 5
Current month: 2