Various Problems in the Study of Empathy in the Context of Counseling and Psychotherapy

1313

Abstract

Article discusses the problems of empathy studies in the context of counseling and psychotherapy. The role and value of empathy in the counseling / psychotherapeutic process is analyzed, as well as mechanisms of the empathic process, the conditions and prerequisites of the successful empathy of a consultant / therapist and its development. The conceptualizations of empathy by K. Rogers and H. Kohut are discussed in detail since in their psychotherapeutic systems empathy plays a key role. Particular attention is paid to the developing approaches to the study of empathy in the context of the psychotherapy effectiveness. The relation between empathy as personality trait / disposition and empathy as a process in counseling / psychotherapy is discussed. The main aspects of the discussions on these issues between representatives of various psychotherapeutic directions are presented. Addressing the problem of empathy development from the educational needs and the consultants / therapists training perspective allows concluding on the necessity to approach empathy as a higher mental function in the studies, and to consider the development of empathy in the learning process as the psycho-technical development.

General Information

Keywords: empathy, psychological counseling, psychotherapy, the effectiveness of psychotherapy, therapeutic relationship, necessary and sufficient conditions for personal change, higher mental function, psychotechnical development

Journal rubric: Psychotherapy and Psychocorrection

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Karyagina T.D. Various Problems in the Study of Empathy in the Context of Counseling and Psychotherapy. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2009. Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 115–124. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Andreeva G. M. Social'naya psihologiya. M., 1988.
  2. Bowen M. V.-B. Duhovnost' i lichnostnocentrirovannyi podhod // Voprosy psihologii. 1992. № 3—4.
  3. Bohart A. K. Empatiya v klientorientirovannoi psihoterapii: sopostavlenie s psihoanalizom i Yapsihologiei // Inostrannaya psihologiya. 1993. Т. 1 № 2.
  4. Bulyubash I. D. Rukovodstvo po geshtal'tterapii. M., 2004.
  5. Vanershot G. Empatiya kak sovokupnost' mikroprocessov // K. Rodzhers i ego posledovateli: psihoterapiya na poroge XXI veka (pod red. D. Breziera). M., 2005.
  6. Vasilyuk F. E. Urovni postroeniya perezhivaniya i metody psihologicheskoi nauki // Voprosy psihologii. 1988. №5.
  7. Vasilyuk F. E. Metodologicheskii analiz v psihologii. M., 2003.
  8. Vasilyuk F. E. Semiotika i tehnika empatii // Voprosy psihologii. 2007. № 2.
  9. Veber V. Vazhnye shagi k pomogayushemu dialogu. Programma treninga, osnovannaya na prakticheskom opyte. SPb., 1998.
  10. Gavrilova T. P. Ponyatie empatii v zarubezhnoi psihologii // Voprosy psihologii. 1975. № 2.
  11. Gavrilova T. P. Empatiya i ee osobennosti u detei mladshego i srednego shkol'nogo vozrasta: Avtoref. kand. diss. M., 1977.
  12. Gippenreiter Yu. B., Karyagina T. D., Kozlova E. N. Fenomen kongruentnoi empatii // Voprosy psihologii. 1993. № 4.
  13. Gendlin J. Fokusirovanie: Novyi psihoterapevti cheskii metod raboty s perezhivaniyami. M., 2000.
  14. Diltei V. Opisatel'naya psihologiya. SPb., 1996.
  15. Igan J. Bazisnaya empatiya kak kommunikativnyi navyk // Zhurnal prakticheskoi psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2001. № 1.
  16. Igan J. Slushanie i ponimanie verbal'nyh soobshenii: prakticheskie rekomendacii // Zhurnal prakticheskoi psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2004. № 1.
  17. C. Rogers i ego posledovateli: psihoterapiya na poroge XXI veka / Pod red. D. Breziera. M., 2005.
  18. Karyagina T. D. Nekotorye aspekty razvitiya predstavlenii ob empatii // Psihologiya obsheniya—2006: na puti k enciklopedicheskomu znaniyu: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi konferencii 19—21 oktyabrya 2006. Psihologicheskii institut RAO. M., 2006.
  19. Kohut H. Analiz samosti. M., 2003.
  20. Kohut H. Introspekciya, empatiya i psihoanaliz: issledovanie vzaimootnoshenii mezhdu sposobom nablyudeniya i teoriei // Antologiya sovremennogo psihoanaliza / Pod red. A. V. Rassohina. Т. 1. M., 2000.
  21. Kolpachnikov V. V. Chelovekоcentrirovannyi podhod v praktike psihologicheskogo konsul'tirovaniya personala organizacii // Voprosy psihologii. 2000. № 3.
  22. Kratkii slovar' psihoanaliticheskih terminov i ponyatii.
  23. McWilliams N. Psihoanaliticheskaya diagnostika. M., 2007.
  24. May R. Iskusstvo psihologicheskogo konsul'tirovaniya. M., 1994.
  25. Orlov A. B., Hazanova M. A. Fenomeny empatii i kongruentnosti // Voprosy psihologii. 1993. № 4.
  26. Pugovkina O. D., Nikitina I. V., Holmogorova A. B., Garanyan N. G. Nauchnye issledovaniya processa psihoterapii i ee effektivnosti: istoriya problemy // Moskovskii psihoterapevticheskii zhurnal. 2009. № 1.
  27. Rogers C. Klientocentrirovannyi/chelovekocentrirovannyi podhod v psihoterapii // Voprosy psihologii. 2001. № 2.
  28. Rogers C. Empatiya. // Psihologiya motivacii i emocii / Pod red. Yu. B. Gippenreiter i M. V. Falikman. M., 2002.
  29. Rogers C., Midor B. Lichnostnocentrirovannaya te rapiya // Zhurnal prakticheskoi psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2002. № 4.
  30. Sardzhveladze N. I. O balanse proekcii i introekcii v processe empaticheskogo vzaimodeistviya // Bessoznatel'noe: priroda, funkcii, metody issledovaniya: V 4 t. / Pod obsh. red. A. S. Prangishvili, A. E. Sheroziya, F. V. Bassina. T. 3. Tbilisi, 1978.
  31. Stepanov S. Proniknovennoe soperezhivanie // Gazeta «1 sentyabrya». 2002, 21 maya.
  32. Stolorou R., Brandshaft B., Atvud D. Klinicheskii psihoanaliz: intersub'ektivnyi podhod. M., 1999.
  33. Tehke V. Psihika i ee lechenie: psihoanaliticheskii podhod. M., 2001.
  34. Etchegoen G. Empatiya // Zhurnal prakticheskoi psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2003. № 1.
  35. Yagnyuk K. V. Anatomiya terapevticheskogo vmeshatel'stva: tipologiya tehnik // Zhurnal prakticheskoi psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2000. № 3.
  36. Yagnyuk K. V. Priroda empatii i ee rol' v psihoterapii // Zhurnal prakticheskoi psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2003. № 1.
  37. Yagnyuk K. V. Sessiya Karla Rodzhersa s Gloriei: analiz verbal'nyh vmeshatel'stv // Zhurnal prakticheskoi psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2001. № 1—2.
  38. Angus L., Kagan F. Empathic relational bonds and personal agency in psychotherapy: implications for psychotherapy supervision, practice i Empathy, genuiness and the dynamics of power: A feminist responds to Rogers // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2007. Vol. 44 (3).
  39. Duan Ch., Hall C. The current state of empathy research // Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1996. Vol. 43 (3).
  40. Eklund J. Hakansson. Exploring the phenomenon of empathy: Doctoral Dissertation, Stockholm University, 2003.
  41. Esser U., Pabst H., Speierer G.-W. (eds). The power of personcentered approach. Koln, 1996.
  42. Elliott R., Friere E. Classical personcentered and experiental perspectives on Rogers (1957) // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2007. Vol. 44 (3).
  43. Farber B. On the enduring and substantial influence of Carl Rogers' notquite necessary nor sufficient conditions // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2007. Vol. 44 (3).
  44. Goldfried M. What has psychotherapy inherited from Carl Rogers? // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2007. Vol. 44 (3).
  45. Goldstein A. P., Michaels G. Y. Empathy: development, training, consequences. N. J.; L, 1985.
  46. Hall J., Davis M., Connelly M. Dispositional empathy in scientists and practitioner psychologists: group differences and relationship to selfreported effectiveness // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2000. Vol. 37 (1).
  47. Hatcher Sh. & oth. An analogue study of empathic process: Working with difference // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2005. Vol. 42 (2).
  48. Hill C. & oth. Helping skills training for undergraduates: Outcomes and prediction of outcomes // Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2008. Vol. 55 (3).
  49. Hill C. My personal reactions to Rogers (1957): The facilitative but neither necessary nor sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2007. Vol. 44(3).
  50. Lazarus A. On necessity and sufficiency in counseling and psychotherapy (revisited) Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2007. Vol. 44 (3).
  51. Orange D. There is No Outside: Empathy and Authenticity in Psychoanalytic process // Psychoanalytic Psychology. 2002. Vol. 19 (4).
  52. Rachman A. Sandor Ferenci's contributions to the evolution of psychoanalysis // Psychoanalytic Psychology. 2007. Vol. 24 (1).
  53. Rogers C. Clientcentered therapy // Comprehensive Textbook on Psychiatry. 5 ed. Kaplan H. I., Sadock B. J.(eds.). Baltimore, 1988.
  54. Rogers C. Freedom to learn for the 80's. Columbus, Ohio, 1983.
  55. Rogers C. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2007. Vol. 44 (3).
  56. Samstag L. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change: Reactions to Rogers' 1957 article // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2007. Vol. 44 (3).
  57. Silbershatz G. Comments on «The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change» // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2007. Vol. 44 (3).
  58. Truax C. B., Carkuff R. R. Toward effective counseling and psychotherapy. Chicago, 1967.
  59. Vanaershot G. It takes two for tango: On empathy with fragile Processes // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2004. Vol. 41 (2).
  60. Watchel P. Carl Rogers and the larger context of therapeutic thought // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2007. Vol. 44 (3).
  61. Watson J. Reassessing Rogers' necessary and sufficient conditions of change // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2007. Vol. 44 (3).

Information About the Authors

Tatyana D. Karyagina, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor of the Department of Individual and Group Psychotherapy, Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, online-school "Psychodemia", Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-0839, e-mail: kartan18@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 7115
Previous month: 19
Current month: 20

Downloads

Total: 1313
Previous month: 10
Current month: 3