The effect of categoricality of perception: the main approaches and psychophysical models

1599

Abstract

The present work is devoted to the consideration from the point of view of the cognitive approach of the fundamental psychophysical models of categorical effect of perception, features of the experimental procedure of its research, as well as the role of contextual influences on the manifestations of categorical effects in the perception of objects of different modalities. In addition, we present a critical review of the methodology of the study of categorical effects, as well as highlight the key discussion issues related to the analysis of the regularities of the development and functioning of the categorical effect, that require further research.

General Information

Keywords: categorization, effect of categorical perception, discriminatory task ABX, task of identification

Journal rubric: Psychology of Perception

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Korolkova O.A. The effect of categoricality of perception: the main approaches and psychophysical models. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2013. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 61–75. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Барабанщиков В. А., Хозе Е. Г. Конфигуративные признаки экспрессий спокойного лица // Экспериментальная психология. 2012. Т. 5. № 1. C. 45–68.
  2. Брунер Дж. Психология познания. За пределами непосредственной информации: Пер. с англ. М.: Прогресс, 1977.
  3. Дивеев Д. А., Хозе Е. Г. Современные технологии трансформации изображений в изучении восприятия человека по выражению его лица // Экспериментальная психология. 2009. Т. 2. № 4. C. 101–110.
  4. Лакофф Дж. Женщины, огонь и опасные вещи: Что категории языка говорят нам о мышлении: Пер. с англ. И. Б. Шатуновского. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2004.
  5. Beale J. M., Keil F. C. Categorical effects in the perception of faces // Cognition. 1995. V. 57. № 3. P. 217–239.
  6. Berlin B., Kay P. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
  7. Calder A., Young A., Perrett D., Etcoff N., Rowland D. Categorical perception of morphed facial expressions // Visual Cognition. 1996. V. 3. P. 81–117.
  8. Campanella S., Chrysochoos A., Bruyer R. Categorical perception of facial gender information: Behavioural evidence and the face-space metaphor // Visual Cognition. 2001. V. 8. P. 237–262.
  9. Campanella S., Hanoteau C., Seron X., Joassin F., Bruyer R. Categorical perception of unfamiliar faces identities, the face-space metaphor and the morphing technique // Visual Cognition. 2003. V. 10. P. 129–156.
  10. Campbell R., Woll B., Benson P. J., Wallace S. B. Categorical perception of face actions: their role in sign language and in communicative facial displays // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1999. V. 52 A. № 1. P. 67–95.
  11. Cheal J. L., Rutherford M. D. Categorical perception of emotional facial expressions in preschoolers // Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2011. V. 110. № 3. P. 434–443.
  12. Cohen H., Lefebvre C. Bridging the category divide // Handbook of categorization in cognitive science / Eds. H. Cohen, C. Lefebvre. Montreal: Elsevier, 2005. P. 1–15. de
  13. Gelder B., Teunisse J. P., Benson P. J. Categorical perception of facial expressions: categories and their internal structure // Cognition and Emotion. 1997. V. 11. № 1. P. 1–23.
  14. Duffy S., Huttenlocher J., Crawford L. E. Children use categories to maximize accuracy in estimation // Developmental Science. 2006. V. 9. № 6. P. 597–603.
  15. Etcoff N. L., Magee J. J. Categorical perception of facial expressions // Cognition. 1992. V. 44. P. 281–295.
  16. Fujisaki H., Kawashima T. On the models and mechanisms of speech perception // Annual Report of the Engineering Research Institute, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, 1969. V. 28. P. 67–73.
  17. Galantucci B., Fowler C. A., Turvey M. T. The motor theory of speech perception reviewed // Psychonomics Bulletin & Review. 2006. V. 13. № 3. P. 361–377.
  18. Goldstone R. L. Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1994. V. 123. P. 178–200.
  19. Goldstone R. L. Effects of categorization on color perception // Psychological Science. 1995. V. 6. № 5. P. 298–304.
  20. Hardin C. L. Explaining basic color categories // Cross-cultural Research. 2005. V. 39. № 1. P. 72–87.
  21. Harnad S. Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categorical perception: a critical overview // Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition / Ed. S. Harnad. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1990. P. 1–28.
  22. Harnad S. To cognize is to categorize: cognition is categorization // Handbook of categorization in cognitive science / Eds. H. Cohen, C. Lefebvre. Montreal: Elsevier, 2005. P. 20–42.
  23. Herba C. M., Heining M., Young A. W., Browning M., Benson P. J., Phillips M. L., Gray J. A. Conscious and nonconscious discrimination of facial expressions // Visual Cognition. 2007. V. 15. № 1. P. 36–47.
  24. Huttenlocher J., Hedges L. V., Vevea J. L. Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2000. V. 129. № 2. P. 220–241.
  25. Kay P. Color categories are not arbitrary // Cross-cultural Research. 2005. V. 39. № 1. P. 39–55.
  26. Kay P., McDaniel Ch. K. The Linguistic Significance of the Meanings of Basic Color Terms // Language. 1978. V. 54. №. 3. P. 610–646.
  27. Kuhl P. K. Human adults and human infants show a «perceptual magnet effect» for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not // Perception and Psychophysics. 1991. V. 50. P. 93–107.
  28. Levin D. T. Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2000. V. 129. № 4. P. 559–574.  
  29. Liberman A. M., Mattingly I. G. The motor theory of speech perception revised // Cognition. 1985. V. 21. P. 1–36.
  30. Liberman A. M., Harris K. S., Hoffman, H. S., Griffith B. C. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1957. V. 54. № 5. P. 358–368.
  31. Macmillan N. A., Kaplan H. L., Creelman C. D. The psychophysics of categorical perception // Psychological Review. 1977. V. 84. № 5. P. 452–471.
  32. Macmillan N. A. Beyond the categorical/continuous distinction: A psychophysical approach to processing modes // Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition / Ed. S. Harnad. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1990. P. 53–85.
  33. Massaro D. W. Categorical partition: a fuzzy-logical model of categorization behavior // Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition / Ed. S. Harnad. N.Y: Cambridge University Press, 1990. P. 254–283.
  34. Massaro D. W. Categorical perception: Important phenomenon or lasting myth? // Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Spoken Language Processing. V. 6 / Eds. R.H. Mannell, J. Robert-Ribes. Sydney, 1998. P. 2275–2279.
  35. McCullough S., Emmorey K. Categorical perception of affective and linguistic facial expressions // Cognition. 2009. V. 110. № 2. P. 208–221.
  36. Mervis C. B., Rosch E. Categorization of natural objects // Annual Review of Psychology. 1981. V. 32. P. 89–115.
  37. Miller J. D., Wier C. C., Pastore R. E., Kelly W. J., Dooling R. J. Discrimination and labeling of noise-buzz sequences with varying noise-lead times: An example of categorical perception // Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1976. V. 60. № 2. P. 410–417.
  38. Paramei G. V. Singing the Russian blues: an argument for culturally basic color terms // Cross-cultural Research. 2005. V. 39. № 1. P. 10–38.
  39. Pastore R. E. Categorical perception: some psychophysical models // Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition / Ed. S. Harnad. N.Y: Cambridge University Press, 1990. P. 29–52.
  40. Pilling M., Wiggett A., Oezgen E., Davies I. R. L. Is color «categorical perception» really perceptual? // Memory & Cognition. 2003. V. 31. P. 538–551.
  41. Repp B. H., Liberman A. M. Phonetic categories are flexible // Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition / Ed. S. Harnad. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1990. P. 89–112.
  42. Roberson D., Davidoff J. The categorical perception of colours and facial expressions: The effect of verbal interference // Memory & Cognition. 2000. V. 28. P. 977–986.
  43. Roberson D., Davies I., Davidoff J. Colour categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a Stone-age culture // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2000. V. 129. P. 369–398.
  44. Roberson D., Davidoff J., Davies I. R. L., Shapiro L. R. Colour Categories and Category Acquisition in Himba and English // Progress in Colour Studies / Eds. N. Pitchford, C. Bingham. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006. P. 159–172.
  45. Roberson D., Damjanovic L., Pilling M. Categorical perception of facial expressions: Evidence for a 'Category adjustment' model // Memory & Cognition. 2007. V. 35. P. 1814–1829.
  46. Rosch E., Mervis C. B., Gray W., Johnson D., Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories // Cognitive Psychology. 1976. V. 8. P. 382–439.
  47. Rosch E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1975. V. 104. P. 192–233.
  48. Rosch E. Principles of Categorization // Cognition and categorization / Eds. E. Rosch, B. B. Lloyd. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978. P. 27–48.
  49. Rosen S., Howell P. Auditory, articulatory and learning explanations of categorical perception in speech // Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition / Ed. S. Harnad. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1990. P. 113–160.  
  50. Stevenage V. Which twin are you? A demonstration of induced categorical perception of identical twin faces // British Journal of Psychology. 1998. V. 89. P. 39–57.
  51. Studdert-Kennedy M., Liberman A. M., Harris K. S., Cooper F. S. Motor theory of speech perception: A reply to Lane's critical review // Psychological Review. 1970. V. 77. № 3. P. 234–249.
  52. Suzuki A., Shibui S., Shigemasu K. Temporal characteristics of categorical perception of emotional facial expressions // Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2005. P. 1303–1308.
  53. Teunisse J. P., de Gelder B. Impaired categorical perception of facial expressions in high-functioning adolescents with autism // Child Neuropsychology. 2001. V. 7. № 1. P. 1–14.
  54. Winawer J., Witthoft N., Frank M., Wu L., Wade A., Boroditsky L. Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination // PNAS. 2007. V. 104. № 19. P. 7780–7785.
  55. Young A., Rowland D., Calder A., Etcoff N., Seth A., Perrett D. I. Facial expression megamix // Cognition. 1997. V. 63. P. 271–331.
  56. Zadeh L. A. Fuzzy Sets // Information Control. 1965. V. 8. P. 338–353.

Information About the Authors

Olga A. Korolkova, PhD in Psychology, professor, Leading Research Associate, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4814-7266, e-mail: olga.kurakova@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 5558
Previous month: 42
Current month: 21

Downloads

Total: 1599
Previous month: 10
Current month: 3