Parallel Process in Supervision: the History of the Concept and Explanatory Models

The article is dedicated to the parallel process — phenomenon of structure and dy- namics reduplication of the therapist and client relationships in the relationships between supervisor and therapist. The concept of parallel process is commonly used by the psychotherapeutic community but at the same time it is not clear enough and therefore sometimes evokes skepticism. It is shown that parallel process is a descriptive but not explanatory concept. The psychodynamics as a condition for the observed paralleling can be various and requires in each case a specific analysis. The history of the concept of parallel process is related to psychoanalysis. Identification, transference/countertransference and projective identification are the main concepts on which the explanatory models of parallel process are based. The authors show that a parallel process is a result of the defensive behavior patterns typical for all participants of communication: client, therapist and supervisor. Asymmetric distribution of the power/subordination positions which is indicative for the situations of psychotherapy and supervision is a provoking condition for the expansion of parallel process chains. Article demonstrates an example of the parallel process analysis in a case study of supervision session for students practicing the Co-experiencing psychotherapy. The authors conclude that «hermeneutics of suspicion» and the model of «defended subject» specific for the psychoanalysis can be used for the studies of the communication process in psychotherapy and supervision oriented not only to psychoanalysis but to the other modalities as well.

1. Busygina N.P. Psihoanaliticheskie idei v kachestvennoj metodologii. Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa. 2013. no. 4. P. 133—145.
2. Vasiljuk F.E. Ponimajushhaja psihoterapija kak psihotehnicheskaja sistema. Doctoral Dissertation. Moscow, 2007.
3. Grinson R.R. Praktika i tehnika psihoanaliza. Novocherkassk: Publ. Agentstvo SAGUNA, 1994. 340 p. (In Russ.)
4. Zinchenko V.P. Shepot ran’she gub, ili chto predshestvuet jeksplozii detskogo jazyka.
5. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2008. no. 2. P. 2—18.
6. Kulakov S.A. Supervizija v psihoterapii: Uchebnoe posobie dlja psihoterapevtov i super- vizorov. St. Petersburg: Publ, Vita, 2004. 128 p.
7. Litaer G. Autentichnost’, kongrujentnost’ i prozrachnost’. In: Brjezier D. (ed.) Carl Rogers i ego posledovateli: psihoterapija na poroge XXI veka. Moscow: Publ. Kogi- to-Centr, 2005. P. 19—51. (In Russ.)
8. Mak-Vil’jams N. Psihoanaliticheskaja diagnostika. Ponimanie struktury lichnosti v klin- icheskom processe. Moscow: Publ. «Klass», 2001. 480 p. (In Russ.)
9. Supervizija supervizora: Praktika v poiske teorii. Viner Dzh., Majzen R., Dakhjem Dzh. (Red.). Moscow: Publ. Kogito-Centr, 2006. 352 p. (In Russ.)
10. Tekhke V. Psihika i ee lechenie. Psihoanaliticheskij podhod. Moscow: Publ. «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitacija», 2012. 464 p. (In Russ.)
11. Uil’jams Je. Vy — supervisor… Shestifokusnaja model’, roli i tehniki v supervizii. Mos- cow: Publ. Klass, 2001. 288 p. (In Russ.)
12. Hovkins P., Shohet R. Supervizija. Individual’nyj, gruppovoj i organizacionnyj podhody. St. Petersburg: Publ. Rech’, 2002. 352. (In Russ.)
13. Arlow J.A. The supervisory situation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Associa- tion. 1963. Vol. 11(3). P. 576—594.
14. Boothe B., Grimm G., Hermann M-L., Luder M. JAKOB narrative analysis: The psycho- dynamic conflict as a narrative model. Psychotherapy Research. 2010. Vol. 20(5). P. 511—525.
15. Caligor L. Parallel and reciprocal processes in psychoanalytic supervision . Contempo- rary Psychoanalysis. 1981. Vol. 17. № 4. P. 1—27.
16. Carroll M. Counselling Supervision: Theory, Skills and Practice. London: Sage Publica- tions, 2001. 208 p.
17. Doehrman M.J.G. Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy . Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic. 1976. Vol. 40(1) P. 3—104.
18. Ekstein R., Wallerstein R.S. The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. N.Y.: Interna- tional Universities Press, 1958. 334 p.
19. Gilbert M., Evans K. Psychotherapy Supervision: An Integrative Relational Approach to Psychotherapy Supervision. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000. 184 p.
20. Grey A., Fiscalini J. Parallel process as transference-countertransference interaction. Psychoanalytic Psychology. 1987. Vol. 4(2). P. 131—144.
21. Mendelsohn R. Parallel process and projective identification in psychoanalytic supervi- sion . Psychoanalytic Review. 2012. Vol. 99(3). P. 297—314.
22. Mendelsohn R. The projective identifications of everyday life. Psychoanalytic Review. 2009. Vol. 96(6). P. 871—894.
23. Rosenfeld H. Impasse and Interpretation: Therapeutic and Anti-therapeutic Factors in the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Psychotic, Borderline, and Neurotic Patients. London; New York: Routledge, 2012. 334 p.
24. Sachs D.M., Shapiro S.H. On parallel processes in therapy and teaching. Psychoanalytic Quarterly. 1976. Vol. 45(3). P. 394—415.
25. Searles H.F. The informational value of the supervisor’s emotional experience. Psychia- try. 1955. Vol. 18(2). P. 135—146.