The phenomenological description and interpretation: examples of the analysis of the data in qualitative psychological researhes

Working out the regular procedures of the text data analysis became one of ways to increase scientific severity of qualitative researches. In full the problem of research procedure implementation, from the author’s point of view, is realized by phenomenological approach supporters. At the same time the author shows other ways (actually interpretive) of extent systematization of the data like practice of question statement to the text. In article examples of various types of the analysis of the qualitative data is given. The author offers discussion of specificity of interpretation within the phenomenological approach, and shows the role of question statements to the text in the process of interpretive work.

1. Bataille, Georges. 1994. Literatura i Zlo. Trans. and ed. N.V. Buntman and E.G. Do-mogackaja. Moskva: Izd-vo MGU.
2. Butler, Judith. 2002. Psihika vlasti: teorija subjekcii. Trans. Z. Bablojan. Har’kov: HCGI; St. Petersburg: Aleteja.
3. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1988. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoj germenevtiki. Trans. and ed. B.N. Bessonova. Moskva: Progress.
4. Kafka, Franz. 2005. Pis’mo otcu. Trans. E. Kacev. St. Petersburg: Hodov.
5. Kvale, Steinar. 2003. Issledovatel’skoe interv’ju. Trans. M.R. Mironova, ed. D.A. Le-ont’ev. Moskva: Smysl.
6. Lakan, Jacques. 1995. Funkcija i pole rechi i jazyka v psihoanalize. Trans. A.K. Cher-noglazov. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo «Gnozis».
7. Leont’ev, Dmitrij A. 2001. O predmete ekzistencial’noj psihologii. In 1 Vserossijskaja nauchno-prakticheskaja konferencija po jekzistencial’noj psihologii: materialy soob-wenij, ed. D.A. Leont’ev, E.S. Mazur, A.I. Sosland. Moskva: Smysl.
8. Puzyrej, Andrej A. 1997. Manipulirovanie i majevtika: dve paradigmy psihotehniki. Voprosy metodologii 3—4: 148—165.
9. Ranevskaja, Faina. 2005. Sud’ba-shljuha. Ed. D. Scheglov. Moskva: Astrel’, AST.
10. Ulanovskij, Aleksej M. 2007. Fenomenologicheskij metod v psihologii, psihiatrii i psihoterapii. Metodologija i istorija psihologii 2 (1): 130—150.
11. Ulanovskij, Aleksej M. 2005. Fenomenologicheskij podhod kak kachestvennaja issledova-tel’skaja metodologija. dis. ... kand. psihol. nauk. Moskva.
12. Denzin, Norman K. 2005. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research, ed. Norman K. Denzin and Lincoln Y.S., 1—32. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Giorgi, Amedeo. 1997. The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 28 (2): 235—260.
14. Holroyd, Carl. 2001. Phenomenological research method, design and procedure: A phenomenological investigation of the phenomenon of being-in-community as experienced by two individuals who have participated in a Community Building Workshop. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, http://www.ipjp.org/april2001/ holroyd.pdf
15. Karlsson, Gunnar. 1993. Psychological qualitative research from a phenomenological perspective. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
16. Ricoeur, Paul. 1979. The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as a text. In Interpretive social science: A reader, ed. P. Rabinow and W.M. Sullivan, 73—101. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17. Schorn, Ariane. 2000. The “theme-centered interview”. A method to decode manifest and latent aspects of subjective realities. Qualitative Social Research. Vol. 1 (2), http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00schorn-e.htm